Anonymous wrote:No that does not change her ability to be elected. Conspiracy is the agreement if one or more persons to committ a crime. Here, witnesses allege Gray and Thompson had a meeting with the intent to start a shawdow campsign. Further they both carried out plans to commit this crime. If Hillary was unaware then she is not guilty of conspiracy thus the crime. I take it Gray is not an attorney otherwise he would have know his knowledge ,his discussions and the fact that he did nothing to stop it would make him guilty. That is if he did this. I believe he did.Hillary is attorney. She I'm sure knows this is a crime. Start reading platforms and vote your conscience .

I don't believe any witnesses have said that. Where did you get this information. If this was true, Machen would have indicted him. Don't make up shit to try to push your agenda.

No that does not change her ability to be elected. Conspiracy is the agreement if one or more persons to committ a crime. Here, witnesses allege Gray and Thompson had a meeting with the intent to start a shawdow campsign. Further they both carried out plans to commit this crime. If Hillary was unaware then she is not guilty of conspiracy thus the crime. I take it Gray is not an attorney otherwise he would have know his knowledge ,his discussions and the fact that he did nothing to stop it would make him guilty. That is if he did this. I believe he did.Hillary is attorney. She I'm sure knows this is a crime. Start reading platforms and vote your conscience .

Thompson did a shadow campaign for Hillary as well. She didn't know about it either. Does this make her unelectable in 2016?

Anonymous wrote:Question, is Hillary unelectable because of the shadow campaign? Answer that before making a proclamation about the Mayor.

Am I missing something, or does this equate a totally public, but unofficial, campaign to get Hillary to run with a surreptitious attempt to evade DC campaign law?

Question, is Hillary unelectable because of the shadow campaign? Answer that before making a proclamation about the Mayor.

It amazes me how people are so comfortable with cheating. Oh "he hasn't been indicted yet . Innocent until proven guilty by a court of law". Ok let's suppose right now which is hard to believe that all Grays staff is lying on him , this is a witch hunt and he didn't show up and negotiate a deal to deter voters with Thompson.
Sulimon Brown is imaging this occurred.

If that's the case then vote for him if you want. However, I'm my own person and this is a case where I don't believe him. I will not vote for a cheat. In addition stop giving him credit for plans that were in the works before he became Mayor. I don't like Rhee but she scarred enough teachers that they began to get their act together. That's the improvement you're witnessing right. Seems to me that Gray kept things status quo.
I don't care what RACE or gender the mayor is just as long as they bring equal prosperity to the black area too. There's still too much inequality, crime, lack of literacy in he's own residential area for me to give him credit for anything . Black folks wake up and don't vote for someone because they're black if they're not helping the black community. Any good mayor would bring economic prosperity to the area he lives in too.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the U.S. need a white president?

Of course not. And neither does Washington need a black mayor.

I beg to differ. The US needs a white president. Racial pandering is destroying our country.

Wow, do you realize that is a totally racist statement?

It sounds to me like you are proposing pandering to whites.

However, I am not white.

Oh, then I guess it's not pandering anymore.

Y'all dumb as shit. As long as none of you are elected officials DC will be okay.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the U.S. need a white president?

Of course not. And neither does Washington need a black mayor.

I beg to differ. The US needs a white president. Racial pandering is destroying our country.

Wow, do you realize that is a totally racist statement?

It sounds to me like you are proposing pandering to whites.

However, I am not white.

I don't care if you are green. Is a racist statement to say that only pandering would lead to the election of a nonwhite as president.

You obviously think that whites pander to blacks when they elect black candidates. So obviously, a non-white like yourself could pander to whites.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the U.S. need a white president?

Of course not. And neither does Washington need a black mayor.

I beg to differ. The US needs a white president. Racial pandering is destroying our country.

Wow, do you realize that is a totally racist statement?

It sounds to me like you are proposing pandering to whites.

However, I am not white.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the U.S. need a white president?

Of course not. And neither does Washington need a black mayor.

I beg to differ. The US needs a white president. Racial pandering is destroying our country.

You just pandered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the U.S. need a white president?

Of course not. And neither does Washington need a black mayor.

I beg to differ. The US needs a white president. Racial pandering is destroying our country.

Wow, do you realize that is a totally racist statement?

It sounds to me like you are proposing pandering to whites.

Anonymous wrote:Does the U.S. need a white president?

Of course not. And neither does Washington need a black mayor.

I beg to differ. The US needs a white president. Racial pandering is destroying our country.

15:10 - thanks for posting the info about hate crime legislation. I'm appalled to find that it's applicable to speech. I have mixed feelings about hate crime legislation in general but I believe that what is typically called "hate speech" should not be outlawed - unless it is part and parcel of the kind of harassment that would be illegal.

And before anyone gets up in arms over this, the reason I oppose hate speech regulations is that it can be used against anyone who criticizes another demographic group. This kind of law can be too easily abused.

To the PP who compared Gray to Brown and Thomas, that's just nuts. I don't know what will ultimately shake out in Gray's shadow campaign, but he was not personally enriching himself. FWIW, while I dislike what Thomas did, I feel for Brown, whom I think was trying to create an upper middlle class lifestyle for his family and lacked the means to do so.