Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding: Embryos don't share a blood supply with their moms - and the embryo doesn't become a fetus until week 9. So you are probably o.k. Now that you know that you are pregnant - abstain completely. Congratulations!
Alcohol crosses over the placenta. Drinking during the first trimester causes the most severe problems. The more you drink the more risk to the embryo/fetus/baby. Alcohol exposure for embryos is also a problem,even though it's called FAS.
The risk associated with light-to-moderate drinking has an association with how well the mother metabolizes alcohol and with genetic variations.
OP, talk to your doctor.
Of course OP should talk to her doctor. I am sure many many women have talked to their doctor in the exact same situation. I know I did. What do you think the doctor is going to say? Its obviously undetectable until birth unless major issues are present. Do you think the doctor is goignt o recommend terminating? No. They are not. They are going to tell you the limited amount they know about the actual risk -- no more information than is present here -- and tell you to be healthy for the rest of your pregnancy.
It often takes far longer than birth to detect problems that result from use of alcohol when pregnant. Often problems aren't detected until mid to late ES.
Right, but at that point, it is difficult to pin the cause down, or to even know if they are alchohol related. A huge amount of kids have learning issues and social issues without having any alcohol exposure.
Anonymous wrote:I did, too, and my baby was early for unrelated reasons, and has delays. Of course, I always freak out about FASD. I found out at about 4 weeks in. I have researched it a lot, and while it is very unlikely your child would actually have FAS -- that is pretty recognizable at birth and the diagnosis is pretty strict, requires small percentile, small head, etc. -- FASD is blurry. There are so many kids with ADHD that it is impossible to pull out the case in most cases.
One issue that does bother me is the whole "nature's way of protecting the baby" -- we are animals and its not like we evolved to drink alcohol. At the time this all evolved, there was probably no need to insulate the baby from tertrogens. So there is that.
I did find, OP, that there is a nutritional component to FAS, they think -- most women who are well nourished and hydrated do not seem to be at risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did, too, and my baby was early for unrelated reasons, and has delays. Of course, I always freak out about FASD. I found out at about 4 weeks in. I have researched it a lot, and while it is very unlikely your child would actually have FAS -- that is pretty recognizable at birth and the diagnosis is pretty strict, requires small percentile, small head, etc. -- FASD is blurry. There are so many kids with ADHD that it is impossible to pull out the case in most cases.
One issue that does bother me is the whole "nature's way of protecting the baby" -- we are animals and its not like we evolved to drink alcohol. At the time this all evolved, there was probably no need to insulate the baby from tertrogens. So there is that.
I did find, OP, that there is a nutritional component to FAS, they think -- most women who are well nourished and hydrated do not seem to be at risk.
A reproductive system that protected the baby from teratogens would always be evolutionarily advantageous, alcohol or no alcohol! There are many teratogens that are not alcohol.
like what?
Like caffeine. And arsenic. And lead. And German measles. And atropine. And... Google "teratogens".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did, too, and my baby was early for unrelated reasons, and has delays. Of course, I always freak out about FASD. I found out at about 4 weeks in. I have researched it a lot, and while it is very unlikely your child would actually have FAS -- that is pretty recognizable at birth and the diagnosis is pretty strict, requires small percentile, small head, etc. -- FASD is blurry. There are so many kids with ADHD that it is impossible to pull out the case in most cases.
One issue that does bother me is the whole "nature's way of protecting the baby" -- we are animals and its not like we evolved to drink alcohol. At the time this all evolved, there was probably no need to insulate the baby from tertrogens. So there is that.
I did find, OP, that there is a nutritional component to FAS, they think -- most women who are well nourished and hydrated do not seem to be at risk.
A reproductive system that protected the baby from teratogens would always be evolutionarily advantageous, alcohol or no alcohol! There are many teratogens that are not alcohol.
like what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding: Embryos don't share a blood supply with their moms - and the embryo doesn't become a fetus until week 9. So you are probably o.k. Now that you know that you are pregnant - abstain completely. Congratulations!
Alcohol crosses over the placenta. Drinking during the first trimester causes the most severe problems. The more you drink the more risk to the embryo/fetus/baby. Alcohol exposure for embryos is also a problem,even though it's called FAS.
The risk associated with light-to-moderate drinking has an association with how well the mother metabolizes alcohol and with genetic variations.
OP, talk to your doctor.
Of course OP should talk to her doctor. I am sure many many women have talked to their doctor in the exact same situation. I know I did. What do you think the doctor is going to say? Its obviously undetectable until birth unless major issues are present. Do you think the doctor is goignt o recommend terminating? No. They are not. They are going to tell you the limited amount they know about the actual risk -- no more information than is present here -- and tell you to be healthy for the rest of your pregnancy.
It often takes far longer than birth to detect problems that result from use of alcohol when pregnant. Often problems aren't detected until mid to late ES.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding: Embryos don't share a blood supply with their moms - and the embryo doesn't become a fetus until week 9. So you are probably o.k. Now that you know that you are pregnant - abstain completely. Congratulations!
Alcohol crosses over the placenta. Drinking during the first trimester causes the most severe problems. The more you drink the more risk to the embryo/fetus/baby. Alcohol exposure for embryos is also a problem,even though it's called FAS.
The risk associated with light-to-moderate drinking has an association with how well the mother metabolizes alcohol and with genetic variations.
OP, talk to your doctor.
Of course OP should talk to her doctor. I am sure many many women have talked to their doctor in the exact same situation. I know I did. What do you think the doctor is going to say? Its obviously undetectable until birth unless major issues are present. Do you think the doctor is goignt o recommend terminating? No. They are not. They are going to tell you the limited amount they know about the actual risk -- no more information than is present here -- and tell you to be healthy for the rest of your pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did, too, and my baby was early for unrelated reasons, and has delays. Of course, I always freak out about FASD. I found out at about 4 weeks in. I have researched it a lot, and while it is very unlikely your child would actually have FAS -- that is pretty recognizable at birth and the diagnosis is pretty strict, requires small percentile, small head, etc. -- FASD is blurry. There are so many kids with ADHD that it is impossible to pull out the case in most cases.
One issue that does bother me is the whole "nature's way of protecting the baby" -- we are animals and its not like we evolved to drink alcohol. At the time this all evolved, there was probably no need to insulate the baby from tertrogens. So there is that.
I did find, OP, that there is a nutritional component to FAS, they think -- most women who are well nourished and hydrated do not seem to be at risk.
A reproductive system that protected the baby from teratogens would always be evolutionarily advantageous, alcohol or no alcohol! There are many teratogens that are not alcohol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding: Embryos don't share a blood supply with their moms - and the embryo doesn't become a fetus until week 9. So you are probably o.k. Now that you know that you are pregnant - abstain completely. Congratulations!
Alcohol crosses over the placenta. Drinking during the first trimester causes the most severe problems. The more you drink the more risk to the embryo/fetus/baby. Alcohol exposure for embryos is also a problem,even though it's called FAS.
The risk associated with light-to-moderate drinking has an association with how well the mother metabolizes alcohol and with genetic variations.
OP, talk to your doctor.
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding: Embryos don't share a blood supply with their moms - and the embryo doesn't become a fetus until week 9. So you are probably o.k. Now that you know that you are pregnant - abstain completely. Congratulations!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did, too, and my baby was early for unrelated reasons, and has delays. Of course, I always freak out about FASD. I found out at about 4 weeks in. I have researched it a lot, and while it is very unlikely your child would actually have FAS -- that is pretty recognizable at birth and the diagnosis is pretty strict, requires small percentile, small head, etc. -- FASD is blurry. There are so many kids with ADHD that it is impossible to pull out the case in most cases.
One issue that does bother me is the whole "nature's way of protecting the baby" -- we are animals and its not like we evolved to drink alcohol. At the time this all evolved, there was probably no need to insulate the baby from tertrogens. So there is that.
I did find, OP, that there is a nutritional component to FAS, they think -- most women who are well nourished and hydrated do not seem to be at risk.
That's very interesting, thanks for sharing that info. I'm definitely well nourished, and I'm SUPER hydrated. I drink at least a gallon of water a day, and besides water, the only other thing I drink is hot tea, and vodka sometimes (obviously, not anymore though). I get kidney stones a lot, so I make sure to drink tons of water.
Anonymous wrote:I did, too, and my baby was early for unrelated reasons, and has delays. Of course, I always freak out about FASD. I found out at about 4 weeks in. I have researched it a lot, and while it is very unlikely your child would actually have FAS -- that is pretty recognizable at birth and the diagnosis is pretty strict, requires small percentile, small head, etc. -- FASD is blurry. There are so many kids with ADHD that it is impossible to pull out the case in most cases.
One issue that does bother me is the whole "nature's way of protecting the baby" -- we are animals and its not like we evolved to drink alcohol. At the time this all evolved, there was probably no need to insulate the baby from tertrogens. So there is that.
I did find, OP, that there is a nutritional component to FAS, they think -- most women who are well nourished and hydrated do not seem to be at risk.
Anonymous wrote:How old is your other child ?
Anonymous wrote:I did, too, and my baby was early for unrelated reasons, and has delays. Of course, I always freak out about FASD. I found out at about 4 weeks in. I have researched it a lot, and while it is very unlikely your child would actually have FAS -- that is pretty recognizable at birth and the diagnosis is pretty strict, requires small percentile, small head, etc. -- FASD is blurry. There are so many kids with ADHD that it is impossible to pull out the case in most cases.
One issue that does bother me is the whole "nature's way of protecting the baby" -- we are animals and its not like we evolved to drink alcohol. At the time this all evolved, there was probably no need to insulate the baby from tertrogens. So there is that.
I did find, OP, that there is a nutritional component to FAS, they think -- most women who are well nourished and hydrated do not seem to be at risk.