Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd like my child to attend a college where he will be challenged, meet decent people, and have a lot of opportunities to try different activities, fields, and jobs.
I think the first and third criteria are more likely to be met by a top college. I went to an Ivy League school, went to grad school at a public flagship, and then worked as a college professor at a second tier university. The kids at the Ivy were better prepared, and the public flagship kids were really hard-working. The second tier school was another matter. The kids weren't that well-prepared or hard-working, and you generally teach to the class median, so professors tended to skip the harder topics in the textbooks. Thus, the same courses were less rigorous than at the Ivy or the public flagship. Grade inflation was rampant, and teaching evaluations affected tenure decisions, so professors gave A's and assigned little debates instead of requiring papers.
That said, the second criterion isn't necessarily well-served by a top college. I met some great people at the Ivy. I also met a lot of jerks. These days, so many of the kids at top schools are headed for Wall Street that ethics may not be a top priority.
Well said, PP. I had similar experiences. Divided my undergrad years between a well regarded SLAC and a not well regarded state school for financial reasons and have two graduate degrees from an Ivy. What I would like to find for my kids is a great undergrad school that will challenge them and expand their horizons, like my SLAC did for me, but without all of the pretentious entitled kids cruising along on their parents' dime. Anybody have a recommendation?
Anonymous wrote:I'd like my child to attend a college where he will be challenged, meet decent people, and have a lot of opportunities to try different activities, fields, and jobs.
I think the first and third criteria are more likely to be met by a top college. I went to an Ivy League school, went to grad school at a public flagship, and then worked as a college professor at a second tier university. The kids at the Ivy were better prepared, and the public flagship kids were really hard-working. The second tier school was another matter. The kids weren't that well-prepared or hard-working, and you generally teach to the class median, so professors tended to skip the harder topics in the textbooks. Thus, the same courses were less rigorous than at the Ivy or the public flagship. Grade inflation was rampant, and teaching evaluations affected tenure decisions, so professors gave A's and assigned little debates instead of requiring papers.
That said, the second criterion isn't necessarily well-served by a top college. I met some great people at the Ivy. I also met a lot of jerks. These days, so many of the kids at top schools are headed for Wall Street that ethics may not be a top priority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I just worry that it's a cruel, unfair world and I want my kids to have as much of a "good start" as possible. I don't care if they get rich or famous -- i just hope they will be able to live their lives without struggling constantly to make ends meet. I believe there are smart and interesting people everywhere, but I fear that we live in a world that focuses more on brands than quality. So all things being equal I hope they can have that brand name. I won't make them crazy to get that brand: I won't push them into Kumon and Mandarin lessons and what have you-- but yeah, all things being equal, I hope they will do well in the brand-name college game.
There's no doubt that it's a cruel, unfair world. And yet, it is rarely so for the children of the 1%. Or, for that matter, for the children of the 5%. I find the hand-wringing about the future of the children of the elite to be pretty unseemly.
I guess I just worry that it's a cruel, unfair world and I want my kids to have as much of a "good start" as possible. I don't care if they get rich or famous -- i just hope they will be able to live their lives without struggling constantly to make ends meet. I believe there are smart and interesting people everywhere, but I fear that we live in a world that focuses more on brands than quality. So all things being equal I hope they can have that brand name. I won't make them crazy to get that brand: I won't push them into Kumon and Mandarin lessons and what have you-- but yeah, all things being equal, I hope they will do well in the brand-name college game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I just worry that it's a cruel, unfair world and I want my kids to have as much of a "good start" as possible. I don't care if they get rich or famous -- i just hope they will be able to live their lives without struggling constantly to make ends meet. I believe there are smart and interesting people everywhere, but I fear that we live in a world that focuses more on brands than quality. So all things being equal I hope they can have that brand name. I won't make them crazy to get that brand: I won't push them into Kumon and Mandarin lessons and what have you-- but yeah, all things being equal, I hope they will do well in the brand-name college game.
There's no doubt that it's a cruel, unfair world. And yet, it is rarely so for the children of the 1%. Or, for that matter, for the children of the 5%. I find the hand-wringing about the future of the children of the elite to be pretty unseemly.
Anonymous wrote:I guess I just worry that it's a cruel, unfair world and I want my kids to have as much of a "good start" as possible. I don't care if they get rich or famous -- i just hope they will be able to live their lives without struggling constantly to make ends meet. I believe there are smart and interesting people everywhere, but I fear that we live in a world that focuses more on brands than quality. So all things being equal I hope they can have that brand name. I won't make them crazy to get that brand: I won't push them into Kumon and Mandarin lessons and what have you-- but yeah, all things being equal, I hope they will do well in the brand-name college game.
Anonymous wrote:I guess I just worry that it's a cruel, unfair world and I want my kids to have as much of a "good start" as possible. I don't care if they get rich or famous -- i just hope they will be able to live their lives without struggling constantly to make ends meet. I believe there are smart and interesting people everywhere, but I fear that we live in a world that focuses more on brands than quality. So all things being equal I hope they can have that brand name. I won't make them crazy to get that brand: I won't push them into Kumon and Mandarin lessons and what have you-- but yeah, all things being equal, I hope they will do well in the brand-name college game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because of the differences I noted between myself (top school) and my high school friends who didn't end up a top school. Even the ones who went to the local top 10 state school seemed to stay the same as they were in high school, whereas I think I grew and changed and actually learned something new, and that's what I want for my kids. This is coming from a town in the south, so maybe the kids from DC aren't as "simple" as we were back then so the delta won't be as important.
(I am home sick today so please don't blame my school if this doesn't make sense...)
I have the opposite experience. My "top" graduate friends and family are not really doing much better than the rest, even those that opted to start a business straight out of HS.
That's a good point, but I really wasn't referring to how much money we all make. I was thinking about how I changed and grew as a person, did something with my free time besides drink beer, learned that not everyone is the same, and had to do some deep thinking that didn't always involve regurgitating memorized information.
I just hope that these state schools are now upping their game to welcome the better caliber of student that is enrolling there. For example, being able to drop a test when calculating a final grade in college is just unacceptable for an institution of "higher" learning, and that was happening at our local top 10 state university back in my day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because of the differences I noted between myself (top school) and my high school friends who didn't end up a top school. Even the ones who went to the local top 10 state school seemed to stay the same as they were in high school, whereas I think I grew and changed and actually learned something new, and that's what I want for my kids. This is coming from a town in the south, so maybe the kids from DC aren't as "simple" as we were back then so the delta won't be as important.
(I am home sick today so please don't blame my school if this doesn't make sense...)
I have the opposite experience. My "top" graduate friends and family are not really doing much better than the rest, even those that opted to start a business straight out of HS.