Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The world is changing, I know, but figuring out something for yourself and using your hard work and ingenuity to get it -- without mommy and daddy's or some paid help is still a valuable skill to have.
This is such a strange thing to say. My child takes music lessons. Sure, I could provide her with the instrument and books and have her figure it out for herself and use her hard work and ingenuity to get it, but when there are people who can guide her and help her avoid self-taught pitfalls and make sure she's actually getting it, why would I? I don't have to lock my child or myself in a blank room and require we derive all knowledge ourselves.
What areas do you see as acceptable for allowing others to teach, and what areas do you think should be learned through solely personal pursuit?
Anonymous wrote:
The world is changing, I know, but figuring out something for yourself and using your hard work and ingenuity to get it -- without mommy and daddy's or some paid help is still a valuable skill to have.
Anonymous wrote:I don't now why so many people are hating on private coaches. I don't see it as any different than private lessons/sessions for anything else. You have an interest in something and want to do it better or achieve a goal.
We've hired coaches a few times to help our kids with sports - not because we want them to compete at the upper levels (it's highly unlikely they ever will) but because sports don't come naturally to them and they desperately want to participate. Our kids also have some known motor planning/coordination issues which aren't apparent to the typical person but for which they've received OT/PT for. We could go back to PT/OT for assistance in sports but, frankly, it's a lot cheaper and more appropriate to hire a coach, the kids are far more motivated and they learn 'technique' and strategies the OT/PTs usually can't provide. Working with a private coach helps our kids learn in a safe, non-pressure, humiliation-free environment. I don't care if the kids later decide to quit. At least after some coaching, I'll know they're quitting because they're not interested rather than because of their limitations/challenges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What has the world come to? Everyone that rich?
Not sure why it's that different from private music lessons vs group lessons. My kid runs track. There are about 80-100 kids on the team depending on the season. So not a lot of personal attention. A private coach on form/strategy would be useful.
Perhaps. But coaches are typically pretty good at recognizing the ones with talent and giving them attention. Even with our hs's track team of over 150, the coaches can tell you who has potential. They may miss some kids who have a deep desire, but these kids too will typically make themselves known over time. TBH, if you feel your kid can't do it without their own running coach, they don't have it. I say this as someone who ran in college myself and knows several kids who are elite runners.
PP here - actually my DC has been recruited to run in college and has been to the state championships several times now so at least has some of it. But that doesn't mean she still couldn't use some help to continue to improve. The coach simply doesn't have the time to work with the kids individually. As you must know at this level it comes down to seconds/fractions of seconds so it's the small things that make a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What has the world come to? Everyone that rich?
Not sure why it's that different from private music lessons vs group lessons. My kid runs track. There are about 80-100 kids on the team depending on the season. So not a lot of personal attention. A private coach on form/strategy would be useful.
Perhaps. But coaches are typically pretty good at recognizing the ones with talent and giving them attention. Even with our hs's track team of over 150, the coaches can tell you who has potential. They may miss some kids who have a deep desire, but these kids too will typically make themselves known over time. TBH, if you feel your kid can't do it without their own running coach, they don't have it. I say this as someone who ran in college myself and knows several kids who are elite runners.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What has the world come to? Everyone that rich?
Not sure why it's that different from private music lessons vs group lessons. My kid runs track. There are about 80-100 kids on the team depending on the season. So not a lot of personal attention. A private coach on form/strategy would be useful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid doesn't have a sport, so no fucking personal coach needed.
why does anyone need a fucking coach? Most people figure it out on their own.
and no parent would hire a coach for THAT.
I dunno, every once in a while you hear about dads arranging prostitutes for teen boys. Does that qualify as a coach?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You mean she decided NOT to participate?
Yes, sorry. Dropped the word NOT.
She saw the commitment involved and what she'd have to give up so chose not to do it.
If I were you, I would have made her do it or told her she owed me the money I spend on the coach. Your kid sounds pretty entitled to have her parent hire her a personal coach to make a team, then make the team and decide not to participate because it would be too much effort.
I'm curious about something: Were you born an insufferable, rude twat, or did you learn that behavior later?
I hired a personal coach before tryouts so she would have some idea of what to expect and to develop some skills. She didn't "have" me hire her a personal coach -- it was something I decided to do for her to put her on equal footing with the competition.
It's her choice to not participate. Playing on the team would have meant giving up a musical instrument, a school play, and some church activities. She's far too young to specialize in a sport. I respect her thought process. She was good enough to be on the team, but didn't want to do that thing exclusively.
She can always do it later.
As for you, your remarks about her being "entitled" sound like projection. I'm sorry to learn that you completely fucking up your children's upbringing, but please don't take it out on others. Keep your failures to yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You mean she decided NOT to participate?
Yes, sorry. Dropped the word NOT.
She saw the commitment involved and what she'd have to give up so chose not to do it.
If I were you, I would have made her do it or told her she owed me the money I spend on the coach. Your kid sounds pretty entitled to have her parent hire her a personal coach to make a team, then make the team and decide not to participate because it would be too much effort.
I'm curious about something: Were you born an insufferable, rude twat, or did you learn that behavior later?
I hired a personal coach before tryouts so she would have some idea of what to expect and to develop some skills. She didn't "have" me hire her a personal coach -- it was something I decided to do for her to put her on equal footing with the competition.
Do NOT feed the trolls, PP.
It's her choice to not participate. Playing on the team would have meant giving up a musical instrument, a school play, and some church activities. She's far too young to specialize in a sport. I respect her thought process. She was good enough to be on the team, but didn't want to do that thing exclusively.
She can always do it later.
As for you, your remarks about her being "entitled" sound like projection. I'm sorry to learn that you completely fucking up your children's upbringing, but please don't take it out on others. Keep your failures to yourself.