Anonymous wrote:This is not a teacher problem, this is a county problem. The new position of the central office is to blame the teachers for implementing a system that they, not the teachers, chose.
If you dangle out a grade that can only be given in rare instances, can not be given for working above grade level, must be on work that they child did not have prior knowledge on, isn't given if the child meets he description on the rubric because someone else did more and needs to far exceed what they are doing in class but this can't be described you will frustrate and demotivate students. Young kids will feel bad or upset. Older kids will say screw this and not care anymore.
MCPS may say that they are not doing a bell curve but only a fool would not realize that this is exactly what their ES model creates. The edict that ES is rare and that teachers can not teach to ES level 's what creates the curve. Its common sense that a kid that is gifted or whose parents have the resources to give them lots of enrichment would be the ones who could spontaneously demonstrate the above description consistently. A smart kid or kid in the middle of the IQ range that works really hard will never measure up no matter what they do because these kids need to know where the goal is to reach it.
ES shouldn't be easy but it also shouldn't be unattainable. There is a big difference between the two.
The outcome is a system that is anti-achievement, demoralizing, and tells kids not to care about academics. Its also teaching young kids that achievement doesn't count. Ironically, the new system "tracks" kids to underperform rather than rewarding kids for trying to overcome challenges.
The replies on this thread are all basically saying the same thing as the teacher..its better to give up. This is sad.
Anonymous wrote:And yet, somehow, the kids in my kids' classes seem to work, pay attention, be happy, and like to do well, just like they used to do under the previous grading system. I wonder how that can be possible.
I doubt that you have any idea what the other kids your kids' class think or are doing. Are you the MCPS staffer who has outed yourself on other threads?
I originally thought that ES didn't matter and didn't really care. It does affect my DS. We moved here last year from private school. In his previous school DS would worked much harder. Now, its a struggle to get him to do more than the minimum because he learned last year that it didn't matter. He can get a "P" as long as he does what is in the box for a P. He tried many times to do what was in the box for an ES but never got one. He's figured out that it doesn't matter, its unobtainable so just get the work done and go do something else. His teacher didn't say to give up but she also pointed out that because ES is rare she can't give it even if the child meets the expectation in the ES box and goes beyond what was required for a P.
I honestly can't blame him because its got to be frustrating to do what was expected for something and then have it held back. What bothers me most is that there is no reward for trying to do better. I guess public education just sucks. You get what you pay for.
And yet, somehow, the kids in my kids' classes seem to work, pay attention, be happy, and like to do well, just like they used to do under the previous grading system. I wonder how that can be possible.
Anonymous wrote:The outcome is a system that is anti-achievement, demoralizing, and tells kids not to care about academics. Its also teaching young kids that achievement doesn't count. Ironically, the new system "tracks" kids to underperform rather than rewarding kids for trying to overcome challenges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure why it's necessary for a kid in early elementary years to even know that they're being graded. My kid is only in K, but I didn't share his evaluation with him, I just told him that I met with his teacher and she told me that she really likes having him in her class and that we're all proud of how well he listens and behaves. I think I'm going to continue to withhold grade information from him for at least a few more years.
Your kid is going to start receiving graded work directly from the teacher. I think that is what we are talking about here.
But how will he know what ES or P means? If he never gets an ES, how would he know that it's even possible? I don't mean to sound snarky at all - just wondering. I wouldn't want him to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Defining ES grade, and making it almost impossible to achieve (I don't know why), is an MCPS policy.
Absolutely!!!!
We are supposed to give ES when the student goes way beyond the obvious correct answers. However, a student with prior knowledge on the subject cannot be a candidate for ES because students are graded only on what is taught in the classroom.
Very very confusing indeed.
We were told however to give more ES's.
Anonymous wrote:It didn't make sense to me when things were graded on a bell curve in my college physics course of all high-achievers, leaving the majority of grade-obsessed students with a B for A work, and it sure as heck makes no sense in elementary school. If that is truly this teacher's policy, you need to find out where that is coming from and how to change it. If your daughter is working her butt off only to be told that there's no point because two kids in the class are smarter than you, then you need to get your daughter into a better teacher's room so she can truly receive the guidance that can help her reach her potential. Just because she might need to work harder doesn't mean she can't be on top.
That teacher needs to be taught that she shouldn't be making as much money because there are much better teachers than her. Let the top two teachers get their full salary and everyone else make less and be told that they will never earn more because two teachers are better than them and always will be. Suddenly their policy might not seem so great, especially if they are 'checking all the boxes off on the list' they were given to earn the top pay.
Anonymous wrote:Another example of MCPS urging regression to the mean under Starr. They'll be happiest when your DD stops trying as hard, in which case it will be easier to show how the low-achievers have caught up. Sorry you have to put up with this. It used to be so much better.
Anonymous wrote:
But how will he know what ES or P means? If he never gets an ES, how would he know that it's even possible? I don't mean to sound snarky at all - just wondering. I wouldn't want him to know.