Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you are making what I strongly suspect are multiple socio-demographic assumptions that are informing your choice. And you are making a severe mistake that will do a generation's worth of damage. An undergraduate degree from UA is of effectively no value, and earning it will impart no breadth, compared to a degree from a top-20. If you complete the forms and make a convincing case, you can easily receive a nearly-free ride if your son is admitted to Harvard, Yale, Chicago, Stanford, Princeton, Columbia or Penn. Your comment to the effect that you just don't believe it reveals what seem to be other priorities and assumptions on your part. Please don't damage your child.
Oh come on. I can't believe this board sometimes. This is so overly dramatic. In addition, PPs have pointed out that it is in fact not easy to get a "nearly-free" ride to an Ivy.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you are making what I strongly suspect are multiple socio-demographic assumptions that are informing your choice. And you are making a severe mistake that will do a generation's worth of damage. An undergraduate degree from UA is of effectively no value, and earning it will impart no breadth, compared to a degree from a top-20. If you complete the forms and make a convincing case, you can easily receive a nearly-free ride if your son is admitted to Harvard, Yale, Chicago, Stanford, Princeton, Columbia or Penn. Your comment to the effect that you just don't believe it reveals what seem to be other priorities and assumptions on your part. Please don't damage your child.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you are making what I strongly suspect are multiple socio-demographic assumptions that are informing your choice. And you are making a severe mistake that will do a generation's worth of damage. An undergraduate degree from UA is of effectively no value, and earning it will impart no breadth, compared to a degree from a top-20. If you complete the forms and make a convincing case, you can easily receive a nearly-free ride if your son is admitted to Harvard, Yale, Chicago, Stanford, Princeton, Columbia or Penn. Your comment to the effect that you just don't believe it reveals what seem to be other priorities and assumptions on your part. Please don't damage your child.
Anonymous wrote:Why is the point about the cable package ridiculous? Cable can a cost thousand dollars a year, easily, or more.
Anonymous wrote:You don't think it is worth an extra 12k a year to send your kid to Harvard over Tulane? In this economy?? Do you not realize how many more job opportunities your child will have for the rest of his life with Harvard on his resume?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't think it is worth an extra 12k a year to send your kid to Harvard over Tulane? In this economy?? Do you not realize how many more job opportunities your child will have for the rest of his life with Harvard on his resume?
It would take the kid years to save $50,000 difference.
He has a much better chance of getting a job that pays well coming out of Harvard. Wall Street recruits all sorts of majors from Harvard. Not so case Western or Tulane.
He also has a better chance of getting into a good graduate professional school coming from Harvard. Take law school as an example. He'll need a 4.0 from the second-tier school in order to get into the same law school that hed get into with a 3.3 from Harvard. He has a far better chance of getting a higher paying job coming from a better law school than a lower tier law school. He could make up that 50,000 in no time with an associate position that pays 170 versus a small regional firm that pays 60.
I wonder what kind of cars and what sort of cable packages and vacations the people who are saying they would not pay the extra 12,000 a year go on and have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't think it is worth an extra 12k a year to send your kid to Harvard over Tulane? In this economy?? Do you not realize how many more job opportunities your child will have for the rest of his life with Harvard on his resume?
It would take the kid years to save $50,000 difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh, pp. why are yours summing second tier will give more money? The schools that have more money are Princeton, Harvard etc.
Yes, but maybe not more money for this kid. Getting a free ride from Alabama isn't the same as getting a free ride to Princeton.
Good luck, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh, pp. why are yours summing second tier will give more money? The schools that have more money are Princeton, Harvard etc.
Anonymous wrote:You don't think it is worth an extra 12k a year to send your kid to Harvard over Tulane? In this economy?? Do you not realize how many more job opportunities your child will have for the rest of his life with Harvard on his resume?