Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who uses BCRs anymore?
Yes, one of the reasons that I like 2.0 is that it made BCRs go away.
BCRs will always be there one way or the other. It will be just called something else.
Regardless, in all standardized tests - along with the sections with multiple choice questions, there are writing sections as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who uses BCRs anymore?
Yes, one of the reasons that I like 2.0 is that it made BCRs go away.
BCRs will always be there one way or the other. It will be just called something else.
Regardless, in all standardized tests - along with the sections with multiple choice questions, there are writing sections as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who uses BCRs anymore?
Yes, one of the reasons that I like 2.0 is that it made BCRs go away.
Anonymous wrote:Who uses BCRs anymore?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The new grading appears to be very subjective.
The old grading was based on 100% = perfect score and on down. Was likely more objective.
100% of what, though?
Grading is subjective, period.
No, it doesn't have to be. You have an exam at the end of the semester, which determines the attainment grade, like they do in civilized countries.
Yes, grading isn't subjective if the whole grade for the semester is determined by the results of one single test that everybody in the whole country takes. Which is not how I define "civilized" -- especially at the elementary school level -- but ok.
Actually, depends on how the tests are structured and administered. Perhaps after every lesson kids take a comprehensive test - multiple choice, and BCRs included? And in the end - add these test scores up?
Since this country is having a crisis in education maybe it is worth the effort to see how other countries are doing.
Anonymous wrote:If you believe that grading can only be subjective then you have never taught or you are a bad teacher. It is a lot of work to put in place and maintain an objective grading standard. It is even MORE work to give students consistent feedback and teach them so they can earn the highest grade reflective of their potential. It is far easier to present the material, let the kids work without any guidance, and then "grade" them on a curve or cluster them all into the same grade.
There is nothing in MCPS that rewards teachers for teaching. There are several dedicated teachers who embrace the idea of getting each child to work to their potential but most don't or feel they don't have time. The central office doesn't care at all. Their focus is solely test performance and the bottom performers.
Anonymous wrote:
Actually, depends on how the tests are structured and administered. Perhaps after every lesson kids take a comprehensive test - multiple choice, and BCRs included? And in the end - add these test scores up?
Since this country is having a crisis in education maybe it is worth the effort to see how other countries are doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The new grading appears to be very subjective.
The old grading was based on 100% = perfect score and on down. Was likely more objective.
100% of what, though?
Grading is subjective, period.
No, it doesn't have to be. You have an exam at the end of the semester, which determines the attainment grade, like they do in civilized countries.
Yes, grading isn't subjective if the whole grade for the semester is determined by the results of one single test that everybody in the whole country takes. Which is not how I define "civilized" -- especially at the elementary school level -- but ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The new grading appears to be very subjective.
The old grading was based on 100% = perfect score and on down. Was likely more objective.
100% of what, though?
Grading is subjective, period.
No, it doesn't have to be. You have an exam at the end of the semester, which determines the attainment grade, like they do in civilized countries.