Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So with this reasoning if I send my kid to a school with many economically disadvantaged students with low parent involvement, my kid should be able to perform very well academically, because the competition is not strong.
But then he or she will get to college and fail.
Anonymous wrote:So with this reasoning if I send my kid to a school with many economically disadvantaged students with low parent involvement, my kid should be able to perform very well academically, because the competition is not strong.
Anonymous wrote:So with this reasoning if I send my kid to a school with many economically disadvantaged students with low parent involvement, my kid should be able to perform very well academically, because the competition is not strong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There are kids that can do well at any school at any time. But the reality is there are better schools and teachers in certain areas and people pay the premium for it. You may complain about your "overpayment" but as long as you don't get redistrict, your house will increase in value more than most school districts, including RM. Look at the Fallsgrove's initial prices and what they go for now. Ouch!
What evidence do you have that the teachers are better at the W schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Right the only direct correlation of student success is parent income and education. Yes the W schools have better scores but that in no way indicates they are providing better educations. Weaker score schools may be doing a fantastic job with great teachers and the extra resources they get to really help needy kids who would be much worse off without them. My mom taught in a very wealthy town in NE. The town lost good teachers to lower paying "poorer" towns to get away from the atmosphere of power parents and snowflakes.
Snowflakes is racist, no??
Anonymous wrote:Right the only direct correlation of student success is parent income and education. Yes the W schools have better scores but that in no way indicates they are providing better educations. Weaker score schools may be doing a fantastic job with great teachers and the extra resources they get to really help needy kids who would be much worse off without them. My mom taught in a very wealthy town in NE. The town lost good teachers to lower paying "poorer" towns to get away from the atmosphere of power parents and snowflakes.
Anonymous wrote:
There are kids that can do well at any school at any time. But the reality is there are better schools and teachers in certain areas and people pay the premium for it. You may complain about your "overpayment" but as long as you don't get redistrict, your house will increase in value more than most school districts, including RM. Look at the Fallsgrove's initial prices and what they go for now. Ouch!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You may complain about your "overpayment" but as long as you don't get redistrict, your house will increase in value more than most school districts, including RM. Look at the Fallsgrove's initial prices and what they go for now. Ouch!
I don't follow this. Fallsgrove is zoned for RM, and the current prices are substantially higher than the initial sales prices.
Anonymous wrote:i am in the Wootton cluster. I have a crappy house that I overpaid about 100,000 for to be in the Wootton cluster, we had to be in the Wotton cluster, because my husband graduated from Churchill and could not fathom that our children will go anywhere but one of the W schools. Now I have friends who graduated from RM and all had very positive experiences and went on to do very well in life. I also have friends who graduated from the low performing high schools in MC like Kennedy and magruder and also went on to do extremely well in life. I personally graduated from a rural VA high school where all AP classes were thru distance education, and the majority of my classmates came from poor families. I ended up with a free ride at UMD then professional school. My husband also ended up in UMD (also honors) but was not able to secure any scholarships. So honestly, I am not convinced that going to a W cluster school will secure my kids future.
Anonymous wrote:i am in the Wootton cluster. I have a crappy house that I overpaid about 100,000 for to be in the Wootton cluster, we had to be in the Wotton cluster, because my husband graduated from Churchill and could not fathom that our children will go anywhere but one of the W schools. Now I have friends who graduated from RM and all had very positive experiences and went on to do very well in life. I also have friends who graduated from the low performing high schools in MC like Kennedy and magruder and also went on to do extremely well in life. I personally graduated from a rural VA high school where all AP classes were thru distance education, and the majority of my classmates came from poor families. I ended up with a free ride at UMD then professional school. My husband also ended up in UMD (also honors) but was not able to secure any scholarships. So honestly, I am not convinced that going to a W cluster school will secure my kids future.