Anonymous wrote:+1 That is why you shoud sign the petition. Already 1366 have signed. http://www.change.org/petitions/vincent-gray-save-school-without-walls-high-school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all so sad...I hope it can turn around -- we were counting on Walls too because Wilson is too large for my next kid and I also don't like the bullying & drug scene. My one kid is graduating this year from Wilson and is doing great in many ways but there were a lot of distractions that came over the years. He is a smart kid and challenged academically will be fine but if we didn't do major interventions there were too many opportunities to stray. I was hoping Walls would be a good option for our 2nd child. Now not sure - we may do private.
If you can do private, do private. Make room for a kid for whom Walls could be a life-changing experience.
You post this on every single thread about SWW. Who are you, exactly? I'm fascinated by your mantra.
Is making more room in excellent public schools really part of noblesse oblige in the District? Seriously?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all so sad...I hope it can turn around -- we were counting on Walls too because Wilson is too large for my next kid and I also don't like the bullying & drug scene. My one kid is graduating this year from Wilson and is doing great in many ways but there were a lot of distractions that came over the years. He is a smart kid and challenged academically will be fine but if we didn't do major interventions there were too many opportunities to stray. I was hoping Walls would be a good option for our 2nd child. Now not sure - we may do private.
If you can do private, do private. Make room for a kid for whom Walls could be a life-changing experience.
Anonymous wrote:This is all so sad...I hope it can turn around -- we were counting on Walls too because Wilson is too large for my next kid and I also don't like the bullying & drug scene. My one kid is graduating this year from Wilson and is doing great in many ways but there were a lot of distractions that came over the years. He is a smart kid and challenged academically will be fine but if we didn't do major interventions there were too many opportunities to stray. I was hoping Walls would be a good option for our 2nd child. Now not sure - we may do private.
AP Government, AP English lit are the main ones.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP on the push towards AP exams. Every year they push kids to take more APs so the school can have a higher ranking. All 10th graders are required to take AP World History and the school used to discourage taking any more but now they push 2-3 AP's sophomore year.
Besides World History, which APs do they push on sophomores?
Anonymous wrote:PP. You are misinformed about Trogisch. He was involved in the merger. He supports it 100%. He chooses to ignore his HS staff, students and parents who do not support what the merger has done to the HS. Trogish is also the or behind the crazy idea to split the junior class in 2 sections and send them to FS on alternating days. Push back at the HS has put this on hold but Trogisch has made it clear he wants this proposal to go through. Don't be fooled by his claims that he is only doing what the chancellor asks him to do. He is up to his ears in his involvement and support of the merger. He needs to go.
Anonymous wrote:Trogich is in the same boat of the high-school principals that handle McKinley, Cardozo and Bell and by all means you don't hear the "sky is falling" attitude at those schools. Trogich serves at the will of the Chancellor, thus if his boss says he must run a campus of that caliber then so be it. Stop trying to blame Trogich for something that came with the job, if he was not up to the challenge he could have regrettably declined to continue his employment with DCPS.