OP's problem is: 1) she need to take more responsibility for having orgasms with her husband, to include masterbating her self, seeking a sex therapist, etc.; 2) it sounds like they are going through a really stressful time right now, and that will always impact a couple's sex life.
Anonymous wrote:PP again, you know, I married a guy I had great sexual chemistry with. And he was a horrible husband. Did not help support the family, did not help parent. We are divorced.
Sex is not a good basis for marriage. It's important, but there are other things that are more important.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not interested in sex at all, but I find that with a couple glasses of wine to get me started, I can fake it in the beginning and actually usually enjoy myself. Wine is the key!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you have any studies to back up the "beta" behaviors equals bad sex? Cuz otherwise you guys sound like you're just trying to find excuses to act like a dick.
It's not that the beta causes bad sex. It's the lack of alpha. You can have both -- in fact, you need both for a solid, long term relationship.
I'm not going to go looking for studies at the moment; but take a look at the characteristics of the hero in pretty much any of the romance novels so popular among women. These guys are not loading dishes or being overly respectful. The girls are pining over the guys on the football team, not the guys on the chess team. Common experience suggests that women's sexual engine gets revved up more by dominant, aggressive, physically strong men more than by considerate, accommodating, physically unremarkable men. I'd be willing to look for studies showing that women get more aroused by nurturing, non-dominant men; but I doubt that's the case. They might like sharing a household with such men, but sexual arousal is something else again.
Anonymous wrote:Personally, I pined for the (cute) guy on the chess team, if there was one, and never on the football players yuck. I always preferred the quieter, studious, more sensitive guys. Of course you don't want to deal with someone who is completely passive all the time, but this alpha-beta thing is just crap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you have any studies to back up the "beta" behaviors equals bad sex? Cuz otherwise you guys sound like you're just trying to find excuses to act like a dick.
It's not that the beta causes bad sex. It's the lack of alpha. You can have both -- in fact, you need both for a solid, long term relationship.
I'm not going to go looking for studies at the moment; but take a look at the characteristics of the hero in pretty much any of the romance novels so popular among women. These guys are not loading dishes or being overly respectful. The girls are pining over the guys on the football team, not the guys on the chess team. Common experience suggests that women's sexual engine gets revved up more by dominant, aggressive, physically strong men more than by considerate, accommodating, physically unremarkable men. I'd be willing to look for studies showing that women get more aroused by nurturing, non-dominant men; but I doubt that's the case. They might like sharing a household with such men, but sexual arousal is something else again.
Anonymous wrote:Do you have any studies to back up the "beta" behaviors equals bad sex? Cuz otherwise you guys sound like you're just trying to find excuses to act like a dick.