Anonymous wrote:Homebirth advocates won't find anything new in what I'm about to say, but everything is fine with your uncomplicated pregnancy/homebirth...until it isn't.
I never even considered homebirth (thank god) but would have been a fabulous candidate. The issue, you see, is that when baby came out, he collapsed a lung with his first breath and was aspirating thick meconium into his lungs and chest cavity. So basically, he was choking on his own shit. Had I not been steps away from a NICU he would be dead, no question. (and I live 3 blocks from Georgetown Hospital). Midwives couldn't have saved him, and a hospital transfer wouldn't have been fast enough.
A collapsed lung happens to one out of every hundred babies, so this isn't even that rare, and I was a young, healthy mom with no induction. And yes, I am telling this story to scare you out of a home birth, because it isn't just your choice that affects no one else, it affects your baby and your entire family. Thanks to the hospital, this common but deadly complication was easily solved and now I have an amazing one year old. But man, I'd probably end it all if I'd been home and this had happened. The guilt...oy fucking vey. How stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again, I know with absolute certainty that most OBs in hospital settings would have responded to my perfectly natural and normal labor process with some interventions (Pitocin for example) that my body would not have reacted well to and the result would not have been good and would have reduced the possibility of an optimum outcome for both me and my baby.
Are you usually this "absolutely certain" when all you have to go on is wild speculation with no evidence? No wonder you're ignoring the study OP linked.
The medical high holy one has spoken.
Ricki Lake?
Damn her. She exposed your lies.
What was that documentary,
"The Business of Birth" ?
Was that it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again, I know with absolute certainty that most OBs in hospital settings would have responded to my perfectly natural and normal labor process with some interventions (Pitocin for example) that my body would not have reacted well to and the result would not have been good and would have reduced the possibility of an optimum outcome for both me and my baby.
Are you usually this "absolutely certain" when all you have to go on is wild speculation with no evidence? No wonder you're ignoring the study OP linked.
The medical high holy one has spoken.
Ricki Lake?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again, I know with absolute certainty that most OBs in hospital settings would have responded to my perfectly natural and normal labor process with some interventions (Pitocin for example) that my body would not have reacted well to and the result would not have been good and would have reduced the possibility of an optimum outcome for both me and my baby.
Are you usually this "absolutely certain" when all you have to go on is wild speculation with no evidence? No wonder you're ignoring the study OP linked.
The medical high holy one has spoken.
Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again, I know with absolute certainty that most OBs in hospital settings would have responded to my perfectly natural and normal labor process with some interventions (Pitocin for example) that my body would not have reacted well to and the result would not have been good and would have reduced the possibility of an optimum outcome for both me and my baby.
Are you usually this "absolutely certain" when all you have to go on is wild speculation with no evidence? No wonder you're ignoring the study OP linked.
I'll say it again, I know with absolute certainty that most OBs in hospital settings would have responded to my perfectly natural and normal labor process with some interventions (Pitocin for example) that my body would not have reacted well to and the result would not have been good and would have reduced the possibility of an optimum outcome for both me and my baby.
Anonymous wrote:
I think it's really creepy that we treat birth as some experience to optimize. The modifier "great" in your post makes me shudder. It's not ABOUT you. It's about the baby being delivered safely. Your need for a "great" birth is immaterial and secondary.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks OP.
I believe women who opt for home births in this day and age are ignorant and frankly, the decision to do so borders on negligence vid a vis their unborn child.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks OP.
I believe women who opt for home births in this day and age are ignorant and frankly, the decision to do so borders on negligence vid a vis their unborn child.
Anonymous wrote:
Having a home birth was the best decision I ever made. It was exactly what I needed to finally feel 100% in control of my life. Even though my child's arrival wasn't easy, it happened the way it was supposed to, surrounded by wise women and in the comfort of my own home, where I was "in charge" of myself, and no one questioned my knowing exactly what my baby and I needed.
If I had gone into a hospital and been subjected to all their regulations, I would have come out feeling invaded and less of a respected human being, and not very empowered to take on the profound task of parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Not OP, but how is this picking a fight? If I were planning a home birth (which I'm not), I would be interested in knowing this.