Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The benefits of Arlington are class size. Some Fairfax schools are beyond ridiculous with the size of their classes.
And yet Fairfax students consistently outperform Arlington students and garner far more academic and other awards, even when adjusted for Arlington's smaller size. Go figure.
Yes, Fairfax is waaaaaay better and Arlington sucks. Is that what you want us to say? If that somehow makes you feel better about your long commute, then we can do that for you.
You do realize that the average commute in Fairfax is less than five minutes longer than the average Arlington commute, right? A small price for better schools and academic opportunities, at least for those who don't need to live in a Lake Wobegon where people pretend each white child is above-average and each non-white child is invisible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The benefits of Arlington are class size. Some Fairfax schools are beyond ridiculous with the size of their classes.
And yet Fairfax students consistently outperform Arlington students and garner far more academic and other awards, even when adjusted for Arlington's smaller size. Go figure.
Yes, Fairfax is waaaaaay better and Arlington sucks. Is that what you want us to say? If that somehow makes you feel better about your long commute, then we can do that for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The benefits of Arlington are class size. Some Fairfax schools are beyond ridiculous with the size of their classes.
And yet Fairfax students consistently outperform Arlington students and garner far more academic and other awards, even when adjusted for Arlington's smaller size. Go figure.
Anonymous wrote:The benefits of Arlington are class size. Some Fairfax schools are beyond ridiculous with the size of their classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the Arlington parents who are so opposed to Fairfax, what do you think of AAP classes, honors classes, etc? Is differentiation only allowed at the high school level or do you just prefer that kids be taught at different levels in their own classroom? Not sure what your concern is with Fairfax.
I do think that differentiation is more appropriate at the high school level. I think differences in children's maturity levels and preparedness are much broader in the early years, and elementary school teachers are accustomed to dealing with a broad range of skills and abilities in their classrooms. Also, children change and grow--an unexceptional 6-year-old can catch up to her peers, while very precocious 8-year-olds can turn out to be just garden variety snowflakes by age 12.
But really my concern is this: in a world of scarce resources, I would rather see special education funding devoted to children who really NEED special services because they can't be adequately served in a regular classroom. This means truly gifted children and children with learning problems, not your typical smart cookie. And if we are not talking about children who need special services (which we decidedly are not when it comes to FCPS AAP), then what we are talking about is special services that can probably be great for kids at all levels, so why save them only for the smart cookies? Why not share that wealth with the kids of more average intelligence? And if the AAP special services are really just more work, more homework, moving faster, then I admit that I don't really see the benefit of that, either. But then, I have never seen a study that shows any long-term benefit of elementary school homework.
I cannot see the real, long-term benefit of separating the smart cookies from the average cookies, and I think doing so may be do the average and below-average cookies a grave disservice. I think the real, measurable benefits for the smart cookies are far smaller than the potential costs for the others.
+100000000 Very, very well said.
-1000000000. In other words, I'm worried that my snowflake won't test into the advanced program, so I'd better come up with a rationale for why gifted programs cause more harm than good. Meanwhile, FCPS, not APS, has higher average SAT and SOL scores and attracts more high-achieving families, particularly Asians.
Anonymous wrote:I think both school systems have their pros and cons. I'm in FX, but my brother is in Arlington. We are both products of FXPS (so is SIL). My kids do language immersion in FX. It isn't at all school, but they do offer it.
Also think about your commute. My brother walks/metros to work. I slug. We both spend the same amount of time commuting.
Life is different on other items. I have a garage and 3 cars, he has two driveways and 3 sheds. I have to spend an hour mowing my lawn, I think he spends 20 minutes. I can avoid 66. they get stuck in 66 traffic on a sunday afternoon.
I wouldn't pick FX for the AAP programs/center, but we turned AAP down to stay with language immersion. I also didn't have too much problem with SACC. We got in a few months into after we started, but we were at an immersion school and they have longer waitlists. SACC is also only for a few years. Most parents drop it late 5th grade/6th grade when kids can latch-key it.
Fairfax does let you go to different high schools, with reason. Due to our language immersion we are looking at multiple high schools to keep with the language (local high school dropped the language we studied). But, IBs & APs are a whole other forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I cannot see the real, long-term benefit of separating the smart cookies from the average cookies, and I think doing so may be do the average and below-average cookies a grave disservice. I think the real, measurable benefits for the smart cookies are far smaller than the potential costs for the others.
Doesn't always help the so-called "smart cookies" either.
You don't have to worry about finding smart cookies in Arlington to separate from the pack because there aren't any to separate to begin with.
nice to see that the fine ladies of FFX have a good sense of humor Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I cannot see the real, long-term benefit of separating the smart cookies from the average cookies, and I think doing so may be do the average and below-average cookies a grave disservice. I think the real, measurable benefits for the smart cookies are far smaller than the potential costs for the others.
Doesn't always help the so-called "smart cookies" either.
You don't have to worry about finding smart cookies in Arlington to separate from the pack because there aren't any to separate to begin with.

Anonymous wrote:I cannot see the real, long-term benefit of separating the smart cookies from the average cookies, and I think doing so may be do the average and below-average cookies a grave disservice. I think the real, measurable benefits for the smart cookies are far smaller than the potential costs for the others.
Doesn't always help the so-called "smart cookies" either.