Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Uh, yeah, that was immediately apparent from your snappish, superior tone.
Please don't lecture us liberal white District residents who've been living in DC since long before you were applying to Oberlin from your parents' Main Line living room. You're not trail blazing here.
OPs tone was cringeworthy and, while it is preferable than unrepentant hostility, yes, it smacks of gross noblisse oblige.
Since you know me so well, you must then already know these facts:
Yes, I'm white. My adopted child is not. My partner and I moved to Shaw more than a decade ago, thinking that'd be a good decision given our intention to adopt an AA child. It remains a good decision, and our child is happy here.
I grew up dirt poor and was lucky enough to manage a state school in the middle of nowhere. Who's stereotyping now?
If saying that people don't need to jump down OP's throat for asking a well-intentioned question makes me sound superior, so be it. If it's just that I write in complete, logical sentences, I'll try to break it down for you a bit next time.
Maybe OP wasn't completely in control of her tone, but I personally read the post completely differently than a number of respondents.
Bottom line, I'm just trying to be human, and asking bitchy people to cut OP some slack I don't see the problem with that, and I'm really not sure why you do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:for starters, never use the phrase "liberal activist gentrifiers," even anonymously and tongue-in-cheek.
+1
+2. I immediately felt sorry for the other parents when I read this.
+3 yuck
Christ, people, really? I appreciate that OP is decent enough to be thinking about this. Not everyone does when faced with the same situation. (I'm recalling efforts at F-S in the not-too-distant past. I happened to be only slightly familiar with those efforts, but was in a meeting or two with a bunch of "liberal activist gentrifiers" who wouldn't have used the phrase ironically, or maybe even known it could be ironic. Their whole style was offensive, and even if I'd liked what was going on at F-S, I couldn't have stomached having to interact with those "concerned" parents who were somehow completely unconcerned with the families who got there before them. Frankly, I bet some of you are a lot like some of them. Anonymity does crazy things, no?
And yeah, I'm a white liberal activist gentrifier, and a good bit of that is true whether I want it to be or not. (But you're all sophisticated enough to know that race is a white issue too, right?) Like OP, I'm at least interested enough in other people to know that's likely how they see me, at least at first, regardless of my own ideas of who I want to be as a member of whatever community I'm engaged with at the time. Just exactly what's wrong with not wanting to alienate people? OP never said her assumption was that all people would immediately believe that about her. Still, you're an idiot if you don't know that some will. Or have you never made an assumption or been subject to stereotyping another?
Such a bunch of mean girls with such talent for turning good intentions into another sign the Apocalypse is near. I hope DCUM is all just some bizarre experiment and none of you are actually raising children.
Anonymous wrote:
Uh, yeah, that was immediately apparent from your snappish, superior tone.
Please don't lecture us liberal white District residents who've been living in DC since long before you were applying to Oberlin from your parents' Main Line living room. You're not trail blazing here.
OPs tone was cringeworthy and, while it is preferable than unrepentant hostility, yes, it smacks of gross noblisse oblige.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:for starters, never use the phrase "liberal activist gentrifiers," even anonymously and tongue-in-cheek.
+1
+2. I immediately felt sorry for the other parents when I read this.
+3 yuck
Christ, people, really? I appreciate that OP is decent enough to be thinking about this. Not everyone does when faced with the same situation. (I'm recalling efforts at F-S in the not-too-distant past. I happened to be only slightly familiar with those efforts, but was in a meeting or two with a bunch of "liberal activist gentrifiers" who wouldn't have used the phrase ironically, or maybe even known it could be ironic. Their whole style was offensive, and even if I'd liked what was going on at F-S, I couldn't have stomached having to interact with those "concerned" parents who were somehow completely unconcerned with the families who got there before them. Frankly, I bet some of you are a lot like some of them. Anonymity does crazy things, no?
And yeah, I'm a white liberal activist gentrifier, and a good bit of that is true whether I want it to be or not. (But you're all sophisticated enough to know that race is a white issue too, right?) Like OP, I'm at least interested enough in other people to know that's likely how they see me, at least at first, regardless of my own ideas of who I want to be as a member of whatever community I'm engaged with at the time. Just exactly what's wrong with not wanting to alienate people? OP never said her assumption was that all people would immediately believe that about her. Still, you're an idiot if you don't know that some will. Or have you never made an assumption or been subject to stereotyping another?
Such a bunch of mean girls with such talent for turning good intentions into another sign the Apocalypse is near. I hope DCUM is all just some bizarre experiment and none of you are actually raising children.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I was you last year. We are staying at our EOTP school.
A few words of advice:
- Be present when you can. Observe. Help. Get to know kids and parents.
- Realize people may resent or be skeptical of you. Even teachers. Be respectful, and disregard it as best you can.
- Do the PTA thing, but don't invest too much in it. Your kid is so young and sometimes PTA's aren't the way to change things. At our school, the PTA has well meaning members but it's not really a game changer. Our school has bigger issues than bake sales, and sometimes what you really need to do is talk to the principal or volunteer your time or ideas. That said, we attended meetings, and the public forum was a nice opportunity.
- Talk to everyone. I had the nicest little group of parents and grandparents that I "hung out" with at pick-up daily. We were incredibly diverse in ways that transcend ethnicity (age, jobs, life experience, relationship to the kid we were caring for), and after talking for 2-15 minutes daily for months, we realized we had a lot in common just by having similarly aged kids in our lives. We knew about each other's days and traffic tickets and families in a way that you don't get from car pool line. It created a nice sense of community. If there was a school issue (for example, we were all upset that there was little notice given for field trips) we could discuss it together and form an alliance to approach the school. That was nice.
- Don't expect things to change too much. Our school has poor testing scores and deals with a lot of organizational and fundamentally non-academic issues and isn't going to work for us for compulsory school (K and up). We hoped it might, but I just don't think it will. But we still are invested in being part of and improving the early education experience, because that's where change often starts with these DCPS schools. If the long term doesn't work out, don't be disheartened.
- Give money if you can. It helps. $200 takes the burden off of the preschool to worry about if everyone can go on a field trip and lets them focus on something else that's more important. I only suggest this because you said you're high SES and want to help. This helps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop writing troll posts, for starters. I think you're a poser attempting to stir up race shit. You'll succeed, bc that's what we do here on dcum. In 5 more posts, a high SES AA mom will respond that she wants the same for her child.
Alternatively you're a hack contract reporter writing an post and want us to give you material. Which we will undoubtedly do.
Hi I'm OP. Call me a troll, awesome, I can take it. But my kid is starting preschool this month and I want to help out without being a jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Be aware of the little things.
Drop tissues off and hand sanitizer. Just leave it on the desk without making a big deal.
Ask the specials teachers if there is anything they need (they never get tissues so offer this to start - as well as sponges for the art teacher)
Don't be the benefactor - there are things that others can do - let them.
Talk to the school counselor - tell them you got too many hand-me downs and ask if they have a need.
Drop of the multiple packs of gloves so the teacher has them for when a child forgets them.
When bookfair comes ask if there is any child who will not have the funds to buy a book - ask if you can donate a special certificate so that they can pick one out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take issue with the stereotypes perpetuated in this thread. Just because OP believes and identifies and self-stereotypes, doesn't mean it's a good thing. In fact, it's bad precisely for those reasons.
Do you think she was being serious?
I suspect that OP was just using shorthand for a bunch of stereotypes about white urban women with which we're all well-acquainted, and which get to the heart of how she may soon be perceived. (Bless her for her brevity, which is more than I can say for myself.) The truth is that those perceptions often stand, at least for a while, when people meet unfamilar others. Now, whether or not those perceptions are realistic is a whole different matter.
Anyway, I get the whole "the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house" thing (even though OP isn't exactly in a position of oppression in this instance), but I equally believe in our right to define ourselves how we choose. (Just ask anyone who's oppressed. The negation of our self-definitions is why stereotypes are dangerous, I think.)
Ironically, in this case a bunch of posters have done exactly that...defined OP without really knowing her. Wouldn't you say?
Anonymous wrote:I take issue with the stereotypes perpetuated in this thread. Just because OP believes and identifies and self-stereotypes, doesn't mean it's a good thing. In fact, it's bad precisely for those reasons.
Anonymous wrote:You can't do anything really. You are just trying to assuage your white guilt by getting the poor people to like you, and thereby obscure the fact that they are being screwed over by the system. So just don't take any anger personally. Don't demand that poor people like you so you feel less guilty about gentrifying!
If you really want to do something, then fight for an increased minimum wage and better social supports.