Anonymous wrote:OP after reading the last few of your posts, I'm wondering if you really understand the amount of time off you accrue. If you've worked at your company for about 10 months by the end of July and you have enough action leave to take the entire 22 working days of August off, that means you get more than one day of leave for every two week pay period in your first year on the job. I have never in my life heard of such generous benefits. That leads me to believe you calculated wrong and the real problem is that you will stop working and run out of leave before the baby comes, which makes you in eligible for insurance absent a COBRA election and payment.
And as to HR rescinding your vacation, yes, they can legally do it.
BTW, I am in employment lawyer with a specialty in health insurance, if that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP after reading the last few of your posts, I'm wondering if you really understand the amount of time off you accrue. If you've worked at your company for about 10 months by the end of July and you have enough action leave to take the entire 22 working days of August off, that means you get more than one day of leave for every two week pay period in your first year on the job. I have never in my life heard of such generous benefits. That leads me to believe you calculated wrong and the real problem is that you will stop working and run out of leave before the baby comes, which makes you in eligible for insurance absent a COBRA election and payment.
And as to HR rescinding your vacation, yes, they can legally do it.
BTW, I am in employment lawyer with a specialty in health insurance, if that matters.
I'm the poster above you. There are companies in DC that give something like 9-10 hours of vacation time per pay period. My wife works for one. Yes, it's insane and I cannot believe it. As for the OP, if she went to HR they did the numbers not her.
Anonymous wrote:OP after reading the last few of your posts, I'm wondering if you really understand the amount of time off you accrue. If you've worked at your company for about 10 months by the end of July and you have enough action leave to take the entire 22 working days of August off, that means you get more than one day of leave for every two week pay period in your first year on the job. I have never in my life heard of such generous benefits. That leads me to believe you calculated wrong and the real problem is that you will stop working and run out of leave before the baby comes, which makes you in eligible for insurance absent a COBRA election and payment.
And as to HR rescinding your vacation, yes, they can legally do it.
BTW, I am in employment lawyer with a specialty in health insurance, if that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I ever had a co-worker or employee want to take a month off before having the baby, I would have been flabbergasted. That's completely insensitive, thoughtless and unprofessional. That last month is making sure everything is complete, to make your co-workers burden LESS when you are gone. If you do this and then resign, I would not expect a good reference!!
Sorry you feel this way, but I have seen many expecting mothers take time off prior to giving birth. Perhaps we work in different worlds. Also, I have to resign. What do you want from me? To take off one week, give birth, and come back to work? Are you crazy?
This is my baby. It's 10x more important than co-workers. Sorry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP can you clarify what your maternity leave plans are? Do you just have tons of leave that you can use up an entire month before the baby is even here?
OP here. When my husband and I finally conceived we knew I wasn't going to make the one year mark to be eligible for FMLA. So, our plan was for me to save up all my vacation time (sick leave was for our doctor visits) and take time off prior to the baby coming. In early May I went down to HR and told them my plans: Since I wasn't going to have FMLA I was going to have to resign, so instead of not using my vacation time I wanted to use it prior to giving birth. HR told me that was fine and that I would have health insurance for both August and September. This was a specific point we talked about.
So, basically yes I have tons of vacation time saved up because HR told me I would be able to take August off. In fact even if I have my baby on the expected day I would still have 5 days of vacation and and 5 days of sick leave left (this would take me halfway into September).
From these responses it seems like I'm in the wrong, but I just don't see it. If HR told me I could take off if I saved my days and I would still have health insurance...shouldn't I have believed that? And, what is wrong with wanting to take time off prior to giving birth? I know A LOT of mothers who have done that. Also, I don't mind resigning at all. My manager and my manager's manger both want me back very badly. The issue I have is why HR is suddenly telling me now (two weeks from August) that I cannot take August off and I will not have health insurance. Why did they not tell me this in May? I have family coming in and other plans already set because HR told me in May I was allowed to take off.
They can tell you the day before your vacation that you can't take off. Welcome to a real job.
OP here. Can they also take away my health insurance because they know I have to resign to give birth?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP can you clarify what your maternity leave plans are? Do you just have tons of leave that you can use up an entire month before the baby is even here?
OP here. When my husband and I finally conceived we knew I wasn't going to make the one year mark to be eligible for FMLA. So, our plan was for me to save up all my vacation time (sick leave was for our doctor visits) and take time off prior to the baby coming. In early May I went down to HR and told them my plans: Since I wasn't going to have FMLA I was going to have to resign, so instead of not using my vacation time I wanted to use it prior to giving birth. HR told me that was fine and that I would have health insurance for both August and September. This was a specific point we talked about.
So, basically yes I have tons of vacation time saved up because HR told me I would be able to take August off. In fact even if I have my baby on the expected day I would still have 5 days of vacation and and 5 days of sick leave left (this would take me halfway into September).
From these responses it seems like I'm in the wrong, but I just don't see it. If HR told me I could take off if I saved my days and I would still have health insurance...shouldn't I have believed that? And, what is wrong with wanting to take time off prior to giving birth? I know A LOT of mothers who have done that. Also, I don't mind resigning at all. My manager and my manager's manger both want me back very badly. The issue I have is why HR is suddenly telling me now (two weeks from August) that I cannot take August off and I will not have health insurance. Why did they not tell me this in May? I have family coming in and other plans already set because HR told me in May I was allowed to take off.
They can tell you the day before your vacation that you can't take off. Welcome to a real job.
Anonymous wrote:How in the world would an employee who has been working 10 months accrue 4 wks of vacation?
OP, it sounds like you probably proposed to HR something they hasn't had to deal with before. They probably thought it maybe ok if you were going to take personal leave. But when they realized you didn't have enough vacation or qualify for FMLA they realized there was a problem and came back to discuss it with you. Or perhaps your boss wouldn't approve your leave? Just because you want to take those days doesn't mean you are approved for those days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP can you clarify what your maternity leave plans are? Do you just have tons of leave that you can use up an entire month before the baby is even here?
OP here. When my husband and I finally conceived we knew I wasn't going to make the one year mark to be eligible for FMLA. So, our plan was for me to save up all my vacation time (sick leave was for our doctor visits) and take time off prior to the baby coming. In early May I went down to HR and told them my plans: Since I wasn't going to have FMLA I was going to have to resign, so instead of not using my vacation time I wanted to use it prior to giving birth. HR told me that was fine and that I would have health insurance for both August and September. This was a specific point we talked about.
So, basically yes I have tons of vacation time saved up because HR told me I would be able to take August off. In fact even if I have my baby on the expected day I would still have 5 days of vacation and and 5 days of sick leave left (this would take me halfway into September).
From these responses it seems like I'm in the wrong, but I just don't see it. If HR told me I could take off if I saved my days and I would still have health insurance...shouldn't I have believed that? And, what is wrong with wanting to take time off prior to giving birth? I know A LOT of mothers who have done that. Also, I don't mind resigning at all. My manager and my manager's manger both want me back very badly. The issue I have is why HR is suddenly telling me now (two weeks from August) that I cannot take August off and I will not have health insurance. Why did they not tell me this in May? I have family coming in and other plans already set because HR told me in May I was allowed to take off.
Anonymous wrote:If I ever had a co-worker or employee want to take a month off before having the baby, I would have been flabbergasted. That's completely insensitive, thoughtless and unprofessional. That last month is making sure everything is complete, to make your co-workers burden LESS when you are gone. If you do this and then resign, I would not expect a good reference!!
Anonymous wrote:If you resign, you won't have insurance anyway though, right?