Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 19:11     Subject: Re:The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
These rich, selfish and entitled pre-adoptive parents need to let go...this was never their child and they duped the bio dad, along with the bio mom and their shady attorney. If they loved this child, they would not have dragged her through this long legal battle and given her to her rightful bio father when he asked for her at the age of 4 months. They just want to win at this point. They do not deserve to be parents and should be barred from ever adopting again.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 18:47     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Anonymous wrote:Wow, I did not see they ordered her return. How horrible for that child. I hope the father fights this.


I didn't as well. The 'adoptive' parents are just being fucking selfish now.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 18:19     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Anonymous wrote:how do you not know what adoption papers but still sign them? He sounds too dumb to be a parent.


Fortunately for most people, understanding legal papers that are thrust in your face is not the standard for allowing them to keep their children.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 17:26     Subject: Re:The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
As if whites didn't already steal enough from native americans.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 17:02     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
how do you not know what adoption papers but still sign them? He sounds too dumb to be a parent.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 16:24     Subject: Re:The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Anonymous wrote:
The father showed NO INTEREST/the birth/or first four months.


Wasn't he deployed?


He was and got the adoption papers on deployment. Did not realize what they were, signed them, realized it, tried to cancel it and they refused. They lied about many things in the process to get around the laws.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoptive_Couple_v._Baby_Girl

Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:56     Subject: Re:The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Anonymous wrote:
The father showed NO INTEREST/the birth/or first four months.


Wasn't he deployed?


Facts are unimportant. Only emotions!!!
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:54     Subject: Re:The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
The father showed NO INTEREST/the birth/or first four months.


Wasn't he deployed?
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:36     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
its a pointless and very outdated federal law. Indian children are not abducted etc. What stupid law. Indian kids are extra special? No, they are kids and the best interest of the child trumps everything. Im guessing most of you don't have kids or else you would know that the intitial 27 month bond with the adoptive parents is huge and to break that and hand baby off to a stranger because of some Federal law based on events 40-50 years ago is reprehensible.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:32     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Anonymous wrote:The father showed NO INTEREST/the birth/or first four months. I can only guess he was pressured by "the tribe" to get the baby back. She is not an artifact to be passed around. The courts should have looked only at whats best for her and that would have been to finalize the adoption.
Its weird to me how so many people think biology trumps all else. Some folks are just shitty parents even blood related. The courts never should have considered that Indian regulation, its outdated and we don't need two classes of kids in this country.

U are nuts..and have no idea of historical context or the details of this specific case
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:31     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Anonymous wrote:The courts never should have considered that Indian regulation, its outdated and we don't need two classes of kids in this country.


The courts should never have considered federal law?
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:29     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
The father showed NO INTEREST/the birth/or first four months. I can only guess he was pressured by "the tribe" to get the baby back. She is not an artifact to be passed around. The courts should have looked only at whats best for her and that would have been to finalize the adoption.
Its weird to me how so many people think biology trumps all else. Some folks are just shitty parents even blood related. The courts never should have considered that Indian regulation, its outdated and we don't need two classes of kids in this country.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:22     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Wow, I did not see they ordered her return. How horrible for that child. I hope the father fights this.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:21     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!
Anonymous wrote:Totally disagree about not breaking the "bond" the child now might have with her father. I think the bio mom described this situation in her op ed. if you are a parent and someone kidnapped your child and then two years later child was found, you wouldnt say "oh well, she has been gone long enough to bond with her kidnapper" hell no, you would get your child back and you would never stop fighting until you did get your child back. The parents who have been raising this baby since birth have gotten a second miracle, they get THEIR BABY back. Who knows what motivated the bio dad to try and get custody. He never gave a fuck during the pregancy. Too late now.


He is not a kidnapper. He is her FATHER. A kidnapper is a stranger, hence what the pre-adoptive family did. Parents, when possible, deserve to raise their child.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2013 15:15     Subject: The rights of a child??? Legal kidnapping!

The father should get to keep his baby.