Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.

Well, OK, but moving Timber Lane kids out of McLean has not been flagged by FCPS to date as a possibility, and I get queasy when it kind of looks like someone who may be at McLean is lobbying to redistrict the low SES kids out of the school. I don't think that's what was at issue with Haycock, even though some Cluster 2 folks tried to turn it into class warfare at times, but I'm not sure why you think FCPS would leave McLean with only four elementary schools (Chesterbrook, KG, FS and Haycock) in the McLean pyramid. I guess they could move Lemon Road into the McLean pyramid, since it physically sits in the McLean district, but that would be contrary to the notion that part of the goal of the Haycock/Lemon Road realignment was to create an AAP center in the Marshall pyramid.

You must have missed the whole Lemon Road/Haycock thing. No one had heard of the idea before October, and the school board voted in January. There are always conversations going on that the public doesn't hear about until the school board has already jumped in with both feet.

Sounds like you're just itching to talk about how you were ambushed. No thanks. Been there, heard that.

Nice try, but we're staying at Haycock. The point was that you don't know everything. Surprise, surprise.

I'm quite certain I know more about FCPS decisions affecting that area than you do.

And I'm quite certain your being a pompous ass.

Better, perhaps, than just spouting nonsense, which is what you've been doing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The McLean part of the Timber Lane is an island. FCPS has a strong history of eliminating islands the first opportunity they get.

Ha! More likely they take the extra kids rom Haycock and redistrict them to Timberlane.

That's even less likely. If anyone is likely to get moved to Timber Lane, it would be people now at Shrevewood.

The plan has been for part of Shrevewood to go to Lemon Road. They won't fill Lemon Road with the AAP center, so there will still be space. I would imagine they will still send part of Shrevewood there. Haycock is in the same high school pyramid as part of Timberlane so it would be much less disruptive to send the Haycock kids there. Of course, their parents will object vehemently and perhaps they will succeed -- although it will be hard when they complained so loudly about how overcrowded the school is and how horrible it will be during renovation. Doesn't matter to me. My child is finished with elementary school. It will be interesting to watch, though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The McLean part of the Timber Lane is an island. FCPS has a strong history of eliminating islands the first opportunity they get.

Ha! More likely they take the extra kids rom Haycock and redistrict them to Timberlane.

That's even less likely. If anyone is likely to get moved to Timber Lane, it would be people now at Shrevewood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.

Well, OK, but moving Timber Lane kids out of McLean has not been flagged by FCPS to date as a possibility, and I get queasy when it kind of looks like someone who may be at McLean is lobbying to redistrict the low SES kids out of the school. I don't think that's what was at issue with Haycock, even though some Cluster 2 folks tried to turn it into class warfare at times, but I'm not sure why you think FCPS would leave McLean with only four elementary schools (Chesterbrook, KG, FS and Haycock) in the McLean pyramid. I guess they could move Lemon Road into the McLean pyramid, since it physically sits in the McLean district, but that would be contrary to the notion that part of the goal of the Haycock/Lemon Road realignment was to create an AAP center in the Marshall pyramid.

You must have missed the whole Lemon Road/Haycock thing. No one had heard of the idea before October, and the school board voted in January. There are always conversations going on that the public doesn't hear about until the school board has already jumped in with both feet.

Sounds like you're just itching to talk about how you were ambushed. No thanks. Been there, heard that.

Nice try, but we're staying at Haycock. The point was that you don't know everything. Surprise, surprise.

I'm quite certain I know more about FCPS decisions affecting that area than you do.

And I'm quite certain your being a pompous ass.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.

Well, OK, but moving Timber Lane kids out of McLean has not been flagged by FCPS to date as a possibility, and I get queasy when it kind of looks like someone who may be at McLean is lobbying to redistrict the low SES kids out of the school. I don't think that's what was at issue with Haycock, even though some Cluster 2 folks tried to turn it into class warfare at times, but I'm not sure why you think FCPS would leave McLean with only four elementary schools (Chesterbrook, KG, FS and Haycock) in the McLean pyramid. I guess they could move Lemon Road into the McLean pyramid, since it physically sits in the McLean district, but that would be contrary to the notion that part of the goal of the Haycock/Lemon Road realignment was to create an AAP center in the Marshall pyramid.

You must have missed the whole Lemon Road/Haycock thing. No one had heard of the idea before October, and the school board voted in January. There are always conversations going on that the public doesn't hear about until the school board has already jumped in with both feet.

Sounds like you're just itching to talk about how you were ambushed. No thanks. Been there, heard that.

Nice try, but we're staying at Haycock. The point was that you don't know everything. Surprise, surprise.

I'm quite certain I know more about FCPS decisions affecting that area than you do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The McLean part of the Timber Lane is an island. FCPS has a strong history of eliminating islands the first opportunity they get.

Ha! More likely they take the extra kids rom Haycock and redistrict them to Timberlane.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.

Well, OK, but moving Timber Lane kids out of McLean has not been flagged by FCPS to date as a possibility, and I get queasy when it kind of looks like someone who may be at McLean is lobbying to redistrict the low SES kids out of the school. I don't think that's what was at issue with Haycock, even though some Cluster 2 folks tried to turn it into class warfare at times, but I'm not sure why you think FCPS would leave McLean with only four elementary schools (Chesterbrook, KG, FS and Haycock) in the McLean pyramid. I guess they could move Lemon Road into the McLean pyramid, since it physically sits in the McLean district, but that would be contrary to the notion that part of the goal of the Haycock/Lemon Road realignment was to create an AAP center in the Marshall pyramid.

You must have missed the whole Lemon Road/Haycock thing. No one had heard of the idea before October, and the school board voted in January. There are always conversations going on that the public doesn't hear about until the school board has already jumped in with both feet.

Sounds like you're just itching to talk about how you were ambushed. No thanks. Been there, heard that.

Nice try, but we're staying at Haycock. The point was that you don't know everything. Surprise, surprise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.

Well, OK, but moving Timber Lane kids out of McLean has not been flagged by FCPS to date as a possibility, and I get queasy when it kind of looks like someone who may be at McLean is lobbying to redistrict the low SES kids out of the school. I don't think that's what was at issue with Haycock, even though some Cluster 2 folks tried to turn it into class warfare at times, but I'm not sure why you think FCPS would leave McLean with only four elementary schools (Chesterbrook, KG, FS and Haycock) in the McLean pyramid. I guess they could move Lemon Road into the McLean pyramid, since it physically sits in the McLean district, but that would be contrary to the notion that part of the goal of the Haycock/Lemon Road realignment was to create an AAP center in the Marshall pyramid.

You must have missed the whole Lemon Road/Haycock thing. No one had heard of the idea before October, and the school board voted in January. There are always conversations going on that the public doesn't hear about until the school board has already jumped in with both feet.

Sounds like you're just itching to talk about how you were ambushed. No thanks. Been there, heard that.

Anonymous wrote:The McLean part of the Timber Lane is an island. FCPS has a strong history of eliminating islands the first opportunity they get.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.

Well, OK, but moving Timber Lane kids out of McLean has not been flagged by FCPS to date as a possibility, and I get queasy when it kind of looks like someone who may be at McLean is lobbying to redistrict the low SES kids out of the school. I don't think that's what was at issue with Haycock, even though some Cluster 2 folks tried to turn it into class warfare at times, but I'm not sure why you think FCPS would leave McLean with only four elementary schools (Chesterbrook, KG, FS and Haycock) in the McLean pyramid. I guess they could move Lemon Road into the McLean pyramid, since it physically sits in the McLean district, but that would be contrary to the notion that part of the goal of the Haycock/Lemon Road realignment was to create an AAP center in the Marshall pyramid.

You must have missed the whole Lemon Road/Haycock thing. No one had heard of the idea before October, and the school board voted in January. There are always conversations going on that the public doesn't hear about until the school board has already jumped in with both feet.

Anonymous wrote:They can move more of Tysons into Langley

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.

Well, OK, but moving Timber Lane kids out of McLean has not been flagged by FCPS to date as a possibility, and I get queasy when it kind of looks like someone who may be at McLean is lobbying to redistrict the low SES kids out of the school. I don't think that's what was at issue with Haycock, even though some Cluster 2 folks tried to turn it into class warfare at times, but I'm not sure why you think FCPS would leave McLean with only four elementary schools (Chesterbrook, KG, FS and Haycock) in the McLean pyramid. I guess they could move Lemon Road into the McLean pyramid, since it physically sits in the McLean district, but that would be contrary to the notion that part of the goal of the Haycock/Lemon Road realignment was to create an AAP center in the Marshall pyramid.

Anonymous wrote:
This time last year, people were saying there was no way in hell FCPS would uproot 90 kids from Haycock because they had always grandfathered in the past. It also wasn't included in the CIP, or anywhere else for that matter. Things change, and the school board does what they want. Falls Church is underenrolled, McLean will grow rapidly with the Tyson's construction. Making assumptions is never a good idea.