Anonymous wrote:Anyone have experience there? Especially re: the cell phone policy. And is it true they have less trouble with drinking/drugs?
Anonymous wrote:Wanted to revive this. We are looking at 9th grade for DS next year. Not 100% sold on the DC options yet. Hadn't thought of boarding but St. Andrews seems like an interesting option -- but in looking at the web site it does seem like it's lacking in diversity (at least in URMs) in both the student body and faculty. Can anyone speak to this? I liked the strong outplacement while still appearing to be a lower pressure environment. Love the no cell phone policy as well.
How is the new head? What kind of student thrives there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My spouse went there; loved it. Very good education. Still close with the h.s. friends.
Have to say though that St. A's isn't above having double standards. While my spouse was there, there was one incident where two kids were caught breaking a particular rule. One kid (the poor one) was expelled. The one (with very rich parents) was not.
Akin to what happened at St. Albans when Gore's son was caught smoking weed. Baby Gore was suspended the other students expelled. (At least Al & Tipper didn't like the double standard and sent him to Sidwell after that.)
Al the third was "counseled out" of sta. allowed to resign. I don't think the others were expelled.
Anonymous wrote:Just made the decision this weekend and accepted for next year. The cell phone policy was a big selling point and the kids looked like kids having fun. The academics seem rigorous but not too insane. I think it will be a good fit for our DC - he is a self starter and would have burned out quickly at the Big3 with DC pressure. Never thought we would consider boarding, but here we are and we are all excited for his experience ahead.
Anonymous wrote:I agree. Let's get back on topic. I have heard that while some of the top New England boarding schools are well-known feeder-schools to the Ivy League, Saint Andrew's is a top feeder school to the leading Liberal Arts universities in the US. Universities like Williams, Amherst and Wesleyan, also known as the "little Ivy's". These "little Ivy's" are in-turn feeders to the big Ivy's for those continuing on to for their masters. While Saint Andrew's students that are in the top 15 to 20 percent of their grades do head to the Ivy's directly, the majority matriculate to the top Liberal Arts schools, with many end up in the Ivy's for their masters. It's a slightly different emphasis than many other top boarding schools... and in some ways a more interesting approach.
Anonymous wrote:Bumping this 6 year old thread hoping for more recent reviews of SAS. Any current parents or students who can offer a perspective? We will be considering for a fall ‘25 start. Is it still a ‘must attend’?
Anonymous wrote:I’m a parent of a current student (and hopefully another two in the future) and St. Andrew’s is still a “must attend” school. They have a new Head of School (their 5th in almost 100 years) who is an alum and understands what makes it special, an incredibly committed and inspiring faculty who are “all-in” and a strong student body filled with mature, polite, hard working kids who are happy being kids. The community is unlike anything I’ve been a part of. A lot of that has to do with their cell phone policy (see last spring's article in The Atlantic) but it’s also one of three coed boarding schools in the country that is 100% residential. Its small size, focus on multi-sport athletes, daily family-style meals, and commitment to financial aid are also in the secret sauce. Definitely worth the ride up.