Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was totally waiting for the "mutilation" poster to get on this thread! Love the stupidity of the word mutilation in context of ear piercing (and I'm anti-piercing for young children). Here is the definition of the word mutilation:
mu·ti·late
[myoot-l-eyt] Show IPA
verb (used with object), mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing.
1.
to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: Vandals mutilated the painting.
2.
to deprive (a person or animal) of a limb or other essential part.
A tiny, pin dot hole is not disfigurment or removal of an appendage (this also applies to circumcision).
You just disproved your own point by posting that definition. Are you really that dense? You actually do sound like someone who would pierce their kid's ears.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to equate piercing ears with abuse and neglect is a serious reach, lady. get out of your little western world. yes, i wrote that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs, get off your western high horses, please. piercing ears is considered a custom in many cultures.
- mom of two girls who comes from such a culture, yet chose not to pierce my daughters' ears.
Just because some consider it a custom doesn't make it okay to put holes in your baby's flesh. Some cultures systematically abuse and neglect female children as well. Is that ok just because some backwards folks value boys more? "western high horses" - sheesh.
It is mutilation to the body of a child who is too young to consent - period.
I was totally waiting for the "mutilation" poster to get on this thread! Love the stupidity of the word mutilation in context of ear piercing (and I'm anti-piercing for young children). Here is the definition of the word mutilation:
mu·ti·late
[myoot-l-eyt] Show IPA
verb (used with object), mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing.
1.
to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: Vandals mutilated the painting.
2.
to deprive (a person or animal) of a limb or other essential part.
A tiny, pin dot hole is not disfigurment or removal of an appendage (this also applies to circumcision).
That is exactly what it is. Are you not an English speaker, PP? Or are you just an idiot?
No it's not you idiotSo when you see all the women out there with their ears pierced you think they have all been mutilated? I myself don't believe in piercing a babies ears. Hell I wouldn't even pierce an elementary school aged kid's ears. But to call it mutilation is so stupid and dramatic. And because someone is calling you on your hysteria they can't possibly be an English speaker? I was raised by an English professor btw.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I love the "but it's part of my culture" arguments.
If's it's that big a part of your "culture", you would already know a good time to get your baby's ears pierced because you would have noticed when your baby sisters, cousins, neighbors, friends, nieces, etc. got theirs done. If you still couldn't figure it out, you'd ask your mom, aunts, sisters, grandma, etc.--other people who share your culture. Not a message board full of people from a very diverse area, that mostly likely do not share your culture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to equate piercing ears with abuse and neglect is a serious reach, lady. get out of your little western world. yes, i wrote that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs, get off your western high horses, please. piercing ears is considered a custom in many cultures.
- mom of two girls who comes from such a culture, yet chose not to pierce my daughters' ears.
Just because some consider it a custom doesn't make it okay to put holes in your baby's flesh. Some cultures systematically abuse and neglect female children as well. Is that ok just because some backwards folks value boys more? "western high horses" - sheesh.
It is mutilation to the body of a child who is too young to consent - period.
I was totally waiting for the "mutilation" poster to get on this thread! Love the stupidity of the word mutilation in context of ear piercing (and I'm anti-piercing for young children). Here is the definition of the word mutilation:
mu·ti·late
[myoot-l-eyt] Show IPA
verb (used with object), mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing.
1.
to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: Vandals mutilated the painting.
2.
to deprive (a person or animal) of a limb or other essential part.
A tiny, pin dot hole is not disfigurment or removal of an appendage (this also applies to circumcision).
That is exactly what it is. Are you not an English speaker, PP? Or are you just an idiot?
So when you see all the women out there with their ears pierced you think they have all been mutilated? I myself don't believe in piercing a babies ears. Hell I wouldn't even pierce an elementary school aged kid's ears. But to call it mutilation is so stupid and dramatic. And because someone is calling you on your hysteria they can't possibly be an English speaker? I was raised by an English professor btw. Anonymous wrote:I was totally waiting for the "mutilation" poster to get on this thread! Love the stupidity of the word mutilation in context of ear piercing (and I'm anti-piercing for young children). Here is the definition of the word mutilation:
mu·ti·late
[myoot-l-eyt] Show IPA
verb (used with object), mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing.
1.
to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: Vandals mutilated the painting.
2.
to deprive (a person or animal) of a limb or other essential part.
A tiny, pin dot hole is not disfigurment or removal of an appendage (this also applies to circumcision).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs, get off your western high horses, please. piercing ears is considered a custom in many cultures.
- mom of two girls who comes from such a culture, yet chose not to pierce my daughters' ears.
Just because some consider it a custom doesn't make it okay to put holes in your baby's flesh. Some cultures systematically abuse and neglect female children as well. Is that ok just because some backwards folks value boys more? "western high horses" - sheesh.
OMG! Are you seriously comparing ear piercing to systmatic abuse of women?! Really???
Not at all. Just pointing out the flaw in PP's argument that because some backwards culture does something a certain way means it is acceptable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to equate piercing ears with abuse and neglect is a serious reach, lady. get out of your little western world. yes, i wrote that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs, get off your western high horses, please. piercing ears is considered a custom in many cultures.
- mom of two girls who comes from such a culture, yet chose not to pierce my daughters' ears.
Just because some consider it a custom doesn't make it okay to put holes in your baby's flesh. Some cultures systematically abuse and neglect female children as well. Is that ok just because some backwards folks value boys more? "western high horses" - sheesh.
It is mutilation to the body of a child who is too young to consent - period.
I was totally waiting for the "mutilation" poster to get on this thread! Love the stupidity of the word mutilation in context of ear piercing (and I'm anti-piercing for young children). Here is the definition of the word mutilation:
mu·ti·late
[myoot-l-eyt] Show IPA
verb (used with object), mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing.
1.
to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: Vandals mutilated the painting.
2.
to deprive (a person or animal) of a limb or other essential part.
A tiny, pin dot hole is not disfigurment or removal of an appendage (this also applies to circumcision).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs, get off your western high horses, please. piercing ears is considered a custom in many cultures.
- mom of two girls who comes from such a culture, yet chose not to pierce my daughters' ears.
Just because some consider it a custom doesn't make it okay to put holes in your baby's flesh. Some cultures systematically abuse and neglect female children as well. Is that ok just because some backwards folks value boys more? "western high horses" - sheesh.
OMG! Are you seriously comparing ear piercing to systmatic abuse of women?! Really???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to equate piercing ears with abuse and neglect is a serious reach, lady. get out of your little western world. yes, i wrote that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs, get off your western high horses, please. piercing ears is considered a custom in many cultures.
- mom of two girls who comes from such a culture, yet chose not to pierce my daughters' ears.
Just because some consider it a custom doesn't make it okay to put holes in your baby's flesh. Some cultures systematically abuse and neglect female children as well. Is that ok just because some backwards folks value boys more? "western high horses" - sheesh.
It is mutilation to the body of a child who is too young to consent - period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs, get off your western high horses, please. piercing ears is considered a custom in many cultures.
- mom of two girls who comes from such a culture, yet chose not to pierce my daughters' ears.
Just because some consider it a custom doesn't make it okay to put holes in your baby's flesh. Some cultures systematically abuse and neglect female children as well. Is that ok just because some backwards folks value boys more? "western high horses" - sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ear are pierced after the Sun-in and before the spray tan. Only rule you need to follow.
And after you put one of those bands around your baby's head with a bow.