Anonymous wrote:This policy refers to the disclosing of personally identifiable information to OUTSIDE agencies/people. This does NOT refer to what PCSB gathers and shares within its network.
Look - I'm really not trying to get anyone's dander up. I had conceptualized this as each charter school being a separate school system, with the PCSB being some kind of umbrella, not really over each of the schools to bind them together as a unit authorizing sharing between its different parts.
I'm not going to go chasing HIPAA stuff. Just noticed the one thing there about FERPA. You feel comfortable that all public charter schools are one entity within its terms, I'm happy to go with that. I just didn't come to this question thinking that was the case.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the one who posed the question about privacy, and I'm not trying to say people should be entitled to double-enroll their kids or anything goofy. Just wondering HOW they're doing this without breaking the law unless - as some of you have noted - by getting written consent, individually. And the reason why I thought of this was remembering what was in LAMB's application form, viz.,
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), a Federal law, requires that LAMB PCS, with certain exceptions, obtain your
written consent prior to the disclosure of personally identifiable information from your child’s education records. However, LAMB PCS
may disclose appropriately designated “directory information” without written consent, unless you have advised the LEA to the
contrary in accordance with LEA’s procedures. The primary purpose of directory information is to allow the LAMB PCS to include this
type of information from your child’s education records in certain school publications.
Anonymous wrote:I think "sibling is still on the waitlist" is a valid reason to hold multiple spots. And this situation isn't limited to families that win multiple lottery spots. It also comes into play when a family is already at one school but then plays the lottery and has to decide if they'll leave the old school for the new school. This is a tough decision for most families and they need a little time (but hopefully not all summer) to figure it all out. But in the meantime, most families don't want the new school calling the soon to be old school and blowing the whistle that the family is bailing. I'm not in this situation, but I'd hate to have my child attend a school for the last few months of the year with that school knowing we'll be leaving by choice. Sort of like staying on a job too long after you've given your notice.
Anonymous wrote:This policy refers to the disclosing of personally identifiable information to OUTSIDE agencies/people. This does NOT refer to what PCSB gathers and shares within its network.
Look - I'm really not trying to get anyone's dander up. I had conceptualized this as each charter school being a separate school system, with the PCSB being some kind of umbrella, not really over each of the schools to bind them together as a unit authorizing sharing between its different parts.
I'm not going to go chasing HIPAA stuff. Just noticed the one thing there about FERPA. You feel comfortable that all public charter schools are one entity within its terms, I'm happy to go with that. I just didn't come to this question thinking that was the case.
Anonymous wrote:Is this really a big issue? I mean, yes, some people are lucky enough to get spots at multiple charters, but is it really enough to make a significant difference?
This policy refers to the disclosing of personally identifiable information to OUTSIDE agencies/people. This does NOT refer to what PCSB gathers and shares within its network.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps this is a stupid question but what advantage does one have for sitting on multiple spots at the same time? They have to make a decision eventually. Is it just that they want to take as long as possible to decide?
Not a stupid question, but all kinds of answers. Some people just want to leave their options open to have time to think, and don't care about being jerks. Others are waiting to find out if before or after care will work. Some might also be waiting to see if a sibling gets off a waitlist at their preferred choice, so the kids can go to the same school.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the one who posed the question about privacy, and I'm not trying to say people should be entitled to double-enroll their kids or anything goofy. Just wondering HOW they're doing this without breaking the law unless - as some of you have noted - by getting written consent, individually. And the reason why I thought of this was remembering what was in LAMB's application form, viz.,
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), a Federal law, requires that LAMB PCS, with certain exceptions, obtain your
written consent prior to the disclosure of personally identifiable information from your child’s education records. However, LAMB PCS
may disclose appropriately designated “directory information” without written consent, unless you have advised the LEA to the
contrary in accordance with LEA’s procedures. The primary purpose of directory information is to allow the LAMB PCS to include this
type of information from your child’s education records in certain school publications.
Anonymous wrote:Perhaps this is a stupid question but what advantage does one have for sitting on multiple spots at the same time? They have to make a decision eventually. Is it just that they want to take as long as possible to decide?
Anonymous wrote:http://www.latinpcs.org/apply-enroll/newly-admitted-students.html
This form on the Washington Latin website seems to be a part of the duplicate enrollment prevention process.