Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.
Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Someone just got served hard!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NP here. All I can say is, you both sound like sanctimonious, condescending, immature, self-satisfied bitches. You think you sound smart, but you actually sound like childish idiots.
I don't give a rat's ass about your lack of belief or your belief. Anybody, of any persuasion, who acts like this in a public forum deserves to be taken down. You're welcome.
Let me help.
1. PP says she's going to list two things, which she does, but then she adds a "Finally." Can't she count to three?
2. No hyphen in "word salad."
3. If you have a colon, you need to separate items 1 an 2 with semicolons, not with periods.
4. Diablolimonius would be an idiotic word to use in this context unless you deliberately want to sound pompous. Oh wait, you apparently do want to sound like a pompous sh!t. Unless you're unaware of your pompous sh!t persona, which is entirely possible....
5. Sanctimonious doesn't just refer to piety these days. In fact, Dictionary.com could put your picture next to the definition.
Do you really want to represent atheists with this obnoxious, yet surprisingly pedestrian, drivel? Anyone reading this would think atheists spend all day tracking down believers to attempt (unsuccessfully, given the grammatical errors enumerated above) to screw with them. You send the clear signal that atheists are nasty bitches with no life outside trolling the internet.
"an" should be spelled "and".
Furthermore, who said I was an atheist. I just happen to dislike intolerant shit-wits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only thing more obnoxious than an evangelical religious observer is an evangelical atheist.
Sure, why not:
evangelical christian: "You must believe in Jesus, otherwise you're going to Hell."
evangelical atheist: "People should be allowed to believe what they want, but if you're going to try to make laws, you'd better have a damned rational reason."
Totally the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.
Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Someone just got served hard!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NP here. All I can say is, you both sound like sanctimonious, condescending, immature, self-satisfied bitches. You think you sound smart, but you actually sound like childish idiots.
I don't give a rat's ass about your lack of belief or your belief. Anybody, of any persuasion, who acts like this in a public forum deserves to be taken down. You're welcome.
Let me help.
1. PP says she's going to list two things, which she does, but then she adds a "Finally." Can't she count to three?
2. No hyphen in "word salad."
3. If you have a colon, you need to separate items 1 an 2 with semicolons, not with periods.
4. Diablolimonius would be an idiotic word to use in this context unless you deliberately want to sound pompous. Oh wait, you apparently do want to sound like a pompous sh!t. Unless you're unaware of your pompous sh!t persona, which is entirely possible....
5. Sanctimonious doesn't just refer to piety these days. In fact, Dictionary.com could put your picture next to the definition.
Do you really want to represent atheists with this obnoxious, yet surprisingly pedestrian, drivel? Anyone reading this would think atheists spend all day tracking down believers to attempt (unsuccessfully, given the grammatical errors enumerated above) to screw with them. You send the clear signal that atheists are nasty bitches with no life outside trolling the internet.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.
Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Someone just got served hard!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NP here. All I can say is, you both sound like sanctimonious, condescending, immature, self-satisfied bitches. You think you sound smart, but you actually sound like childish idiots.
I don't give a rat's ass about your lack of belief or your belief. Anybody, of any persuasion, who acts like this in a public forum deserves to be taken down. You're welcome.
Let me help.
1. PP says she's going to list two things, which she does, but then she adds a "Finally." Can't she count to three?
2. No hyphen in "word salad."
3. If you have a colon, you need to separate items 1 an 2 with semicolons, not with periods.
4. Diablolimonius would be an idiotic word to use in this context unless you deliberately want to sound pompous. Oh wait, you apparently do want to sound like a pompous sh!t. Unless you're unaware of your pompous sh!t persona, which is entirely possible....
5. Sanctimonious doesn't just refer to piety these days. In fact, Dictionary.com could put your picture next to the definition.
Do you really want to represent atheists with this obnoxious, yet surprisingly pedestrian, drivel? Anyone reading this would think atheists spend all day tracking down believers to attempt (unsuccessfully, given the grammatical errors enumerated above) to screw with them. You send the clear signal that atheists are nasty bitches with no life outside trolling the internet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.
Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Someone just got served hard!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NP here. All I can say is, you both sound like sanctimonious, condescending, immature, self-satisfied bitches. You think you sound smart, but you actually sound like childish idiots.
I don't give a rat's ass about your lack of belief or your belief. Anybody, of any persuasion, who acts like this in a public forum deserves to be taken down. You're welcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.
Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Someone just got served hard!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NP here. All I can say is, you both sound like sanctimonious, condescending, immature, self-satisfied bitches. You think you sound smart, but you actually sound like childish idiots.
I don't give a rat's ass about your lack of belief or your belief. Anybody, of any persuasion, who acts like this in a public forum deserves to be taken down. You're welcome.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.
Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Someone just got served hard!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only thing more obnoxious than an evangelical religious observer is an evangelical atheist.
Sure, why not:
evangelical christian: "You must believe in Jesus, otherwise you're going to Hell."
evangelical atheist: "People should be allowed to believe what they want, but if you're going to try to make laws, you'd better have a damned rational reason."
Totally the same thing.
Um, no. Not even remotely the same thing. An evangelical atheist runs around screaming, "THERE IS NO GOD" and telling people who believe there is one that they're stupid. That's just as bad, if not worse, than telling someone they'll go to hell.
What you describe is moral relativism. That's different.
Oh, and don't roll your eyes at me. What are you, 12?
Not sure what you mean by this in this context. Also, no one "runs around screaming, 'THERE IS NO GOD'"
Are you sure the atheists are calling you stupid because you're a believer, and not for some other reason?
![]()
![]()
Again with the eye roll. So puerile.
I didn't say I am a "believer." But, yeah, if you spend much time on DCUM reading the ranting atheist phrases, there are a fair number who spend an ordinate amount of time arguing that there is no God. Which is just really obnoxious and sanctimonious behavior.
Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.
Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only thing more obnoxious than an evangelical religious observer is an evangelical atheist.
Sure, why not:
evangelical christian: "You must believe in Jesus, otherwise you're going to Hell."
evangelical atheist: "People should be allowed to believe what they want, but if you're going to try to make laws, you'd better have a damned rational reason."
Totally the same thing.
Um, no. Not even remotely the same thing. An evangelical atheist runs around screaming, "THERE IS NO GOD" and telling people who believe there is one that they're stupid. That's just as bad, if not worse, than telling someone they'll go to hell.
What you describe is moral relativism. That's different.
Oh, and don't roll your eyes at me. What are you, 12?
Not sure what you mean by this in this context. Also, no one "runs around screaming, 'THERE IS NO GOD'"
Are you sure the atheists are calling you stupid because you're a believer, and not for some other reason?
![]()
![]()
Again with the eye roll. So puerile.
I didn't say I am a "believer." But, yeah, if you spend much time on DCUM reading the ranting atheist phrases, there are a fair number who spend an ordinate amount of time arguing that there is no God. Which is just really obnoxious and sanctimonious behavior.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only thing more obnoxious than an evangelical religious observer is an evangelical atheist.
Sure, why not:
evangelical christian: "You must believe in Jesus, otherwise you're going to Hell."
evangelical atheist: "People should be allowed to believe what they want, but if you're going to try to make laws, you'd better have a damned rational reason."
Totally the same thing.
Um, no. Not even remotely the same thing. An evangelical atheist runs around screaming, "THERE IS NO GOD" and telling people who believe there is one that they're stupid. That's just as bad, if not worse, than telling someone they'll go to hell.
What you describe is moral relativism. That's different.
Oh, and don't roll your eyes at me. What are you, 12?
You mean like the religious person who pops into a thread that's clearly about Atheism, and screams BUT LOOK AT MEEEEE!![]()
Religious people whining about atheists speaking up, is like a man complaining about women speaking up - they're both speaking from a place of immense privilege.
I think the point is atheists have no reason to speak up. You don't believe in God, so why even have the conversation. Because if you do, you're trying to convince or convert someone else's way of thinking and that makes you worse than the religious person who prosthelytizes because, unlike the religious person, you don't actually hold a belief. You have no call to action. And thus, you have nothing of value to say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only thing more obnoxious than an evangelical religious observer is an evangelical atheist.
Sure, why not:
evangelical christian: "You must believe in Jesus, otherwise you're going to Hell."
evangelical atheist: "People should be allowed to believe what they want, but if you're going to try to make laws, you'd better have a damned rational reason."
Totally the same thing.
Um, no. Not even remotely the same thing. An evangelical atheist runs around screaming, "THERE IS NO GOD" and telling people who believe there is one that they're stupid. That's just as bad, if not worse, than telling someone they'll go to hell.
What you describe is moral relativism. That's different.
Oh, and don't roll your eyes at me. What are you, 12?
You mean like the religious person who pops into a thread that's clearly about Atheism, and screams BUT LOOK AT MEEEEE!![]()
Religious people whining about atheists speaking up, is like a man complaining about women speaking up - they're both speaking from a place of immense privilege.
I think the point is atheists have no reason to speak up. You don't believe in God, so why even have the conversation. Because if you do, you're trying to convince or convert someone else's way of thinking and that makes you worse than the religious person who prosthelytizes because, unlike the religious person, you don't actually hold a belief. You have no call to action. And thus, you have nothing of value to say.