Anonymous wrote:I am going to say this as an older woman who got married late and only has one child but I really think that Sanberg is full of shit. This is because if you do this "Lean-in" crap and focus on getting yourself ahead despite your "family obstacles", your children and society are going to pay the price for not having a mother around. They will grow up to be sociopaths either mildly or full-on.
You can never spend enough time with your kids if you are working. I am not saying don't work and get ahead but please put your foot down to working 50+ hours at the office just because there is a carrot in front you. Companies are bleeding employees dry and there will always be more indians than chiefs. I think it is a ploy to get more people to work 50 hour weeks.
At 25-40 hours a week you can do both career and family. But, anything more the kids will truly suffer. Don't get me wrong, it sucks that it has to be that way. But, kids need nurturing from their mothers and it isn't the same from dads or grandparents. I don't know why, it just is. And I for one hate to have to admit that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"At 25-40 hours a week you can do both career and family. But, anything more the kids will truly suffer. Don't get me wrong, it sucks that it has to be that way. But, kids need nurturing from their mothers and it isn't the same from dads or grandparents. I don't know why, it just is. And I for one hate to have to admit that. "
Stats, please. Otherwise, you are full of shit. It just is.
NP here. i think it is sad that you need stats to reflect that kids need face time with their parents, and working 45+ hours a week out of the home inhibits that time.
Anonymous wrote:I wish the the profits from Lean In went to a charitable organization, rather than to more middle-upper class women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that some people are commenting who have not read or heard what Lean In is about. First, no one says you have to work 80 hours/week to be successful or to join a circle with Lean In. In fact that is the exact opposite.
As a full time working mother I have a career which I love and a spouse and child I adore. The spouse steps up - big time- and it helps me to do what I do... and vice versa. What I want to see is more confidence... and I need stories and support from other professional working women to give me some boosts, tips, and the confidence to step up.
Tearing other women down for working hard AND being mothers is the exact opposite of the intent.
I agree completely. So many of my friends left the workforce when they had kids and I've found I just don't know many other working moms--even in the DC area. I'd love to find a group of people to talk about what works to excel in your career while having a family.
Anonymous wrote:We cannot have it all. I wish we could, but we can't.
Anonymous wrote:
And why the fuck should only women with "helpful" husbands and "money" for housekeepers and nannies get the high level jobs?
Agreed! I wish we were talking about policy changes as a part of this discussion. Let's hear it for high quality, subsidized child care.
Anonymous wrote:I am going to say this as an older woman who got married late and only has one child but I really think that Sanberg is full of shit. This is because if you do this "Lean-in" crap and focus on getting yourself ahead despite your "family obstacles", your children and society are going to pay the price for not having a mother around. They will grow up to be sociopaths either mildly or full-on.
You can never spend enough time with your kids if you are working. I am not saying don't work and get ahead but please put your foot down to working 50+ hours at the office just because there is a carrot in front you. Companies are bleeding employees dry and there will always be more indians than chiefs. I think it is a ploy to get more people to work 50 hour weeks.
At 25-40 hours a week you can do both career and family. But, anything more the kids will truly suffer. Don't get me wrong, it sucks that it has to be that way. But, kids need nurturing from their mothers and it isn't the same from dads or grandparents. I don't know why, it just is. And I for one hate to have to admit that.
Anonymous wrote:To the skeptics, how is Sandberg profiting from the circles? Book sales, ok, but to set up a circle all you have to do is say you did. Why the hate?
Anonymous wrote:"At 25-40 hours a week you can do both career and family. But, anything more the kids will truly suffer. Don't get me wrong, it sucks that it has to be that way. But, kids need nurturing from their mothers and it isn't the same from dads or grandparents. I don't know why, it just is. And I for one hate to have to admit that. "
Stats, please. Otherwise, you are full of shit. It just is.
Anonymous wrote:We ALL need better and more affordable child care and not to be penalized for working a flex schedule that accomodates kids and parenting.