I wish Sidwell actually posted exmissions, like all the other independent schools in the area.
Anonymous wrote:
I can see the reason for the confusion R/T my post. DS does not go to Sidwell, but another NW DC Independant school, where I said the average kid is an "A" student. There is no grade inflation at my DS's school. What I am saying is that, if you took 70% of the kids at DS's school and put them at any other school they would be in the top 10% of the class in terms of academic achievement. As an adult who went to public school where there was a broad range, its kind of obvious that DS's class is not an "average" group of kids. All you have to do is host a play date, its obvious . In short, its a fast crowd. Its like if you took the top kids from every local school around and sent them all to one school, then re-adjusted the curriculum so that you teach to that top 10% because that is the new "middle". Everyone is an A student. Its like giving the teachers all honors kids to work with and nothing else.
There are also kids there who are above average, but maybe not the CTY type. I imagine an average or just above average kid would have to work their ass off just to keep up ( this is based on my perpective as an adult who is asked to sign graded tests, essays, and , field "mom did you learn this in school " type questions. The answer is, no, not in 4th grade.
Maybe the "bottom half" of class still get s an A or two, but they work their ass off to get. Think Med school, think law school kind of working ass off, only they are 10, 11 years old. My point is, kids who get B's in such an environment are not unmotivated or as PP said, they are just in with a fast crowd and working as had as they can, and probably getting B's , once and a while an A, and the occasional C.
After a decade of that kind of applied study, any university would be lucky to have them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was a bottom half. Although there is no class rank so there is no way to know for sure. I went to a top 10 SLAC and an even better grad school. Obviously things have changed since then but my sense is the 50-75% group is going to Michigan, Kenyon, Dickinson, Trinity, UMD, etc. Not sure about the bottom quartile - probably a tier below. That's based on a totally unscientific study of where some of the recent grads we know have gone. Big state schools can be a challenge for places like Sidwell where Bs are not uncommon. GPAs/scores will be important and the Sidwell name won't mean much when they are processing 20-30,000 applications. A 3.0 will look like a 3.0.
This is correct. As a 15-20%-er at Sidwell I went to a non-HYP Ivy.
Interesting -- as the parent of 2 recent grads, I'd say this sounds like a reasonably good summary of current admissions trends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:11What make syou think " bottom half student" indicates C's. My DS attends another school , and just about his entire class gets all A's''
I'm a Sidwell parent. A very, very small group of kids have all As. Kids in the bottom half of the class usually still have very strong SAT scores. I think I read somewhere on this site that Sidwell averages 700 on SAT scores. That seems relatively accurate from what I have seen.
Another Sidwell parent here -- can I ask what you're basing this on? I know the kids claim to know what everyone else scored, but do you really think those reports are credible beyond your child's circle of very close friends? I sure don't.
Anonymous wrote:There is quite a lot of variability from year to year, but Sidwell in a recent graduating class sent I believe 8 to Yale, 2 to Harvard, 1 to Princeton, 1 to Stanford, 1 to MIT, 4-5 to Cornell, 2-3 to Brown, 3 to Columbia, 2-3 each to Penn and Duke, 6 to Michigan, another 8-10 to the very top SLACs (Pomona, Midd, Bowdoin, Amherst), a few to U Va, U Chicago, Rice, Northwestern, quite a few to NYU including honors program. There were a few legacies in there but by no means all, only 1 athletic recruit. I completely believe that the median composite SAT score is around 2100. The lower half or third of the class is going to have mostly Bs, with a few As and Cs thrown in, the lowest 10% might have all low Bs and Cs, there is virtually no one even at the very top of the class that graduates with straight As, the grading is not inflated, but even kids with scattered Bs particularly freshman and sophmore year can get into HYPS, without any other specific hooks such as athletics or legacy. The college advising in our experience was very good and personalized and absolutely did not spend more time/focus on the top 20% academically, really everyone at the school just about takes themselves seriously as a student and works hard by particularly the second half of high school, and is taken seriously by the school regarding college placement. I have no idea exactly which kids in the classes were lower quarter or so in terms of grades/testing, but my guess would be they were perhaps the ones going to places such as George Washington, Tufts, Wellesley, Barnard, Colgate, Occidental, Wake Forest, U Rochester, but really it seemed like just about everyone was going to a very strong college/university. I think it is the kids that are somewhat below the median at Sidwell that probably got the most out of the individualized college counseling process and the strong relationships the school has with admissions departments at a wide variety of great schools. And as a PP said, kids from Sidwell or similar schools are going to have a very easy time in college based on their strong writing and analysis skills.
Anonymous wrote:regardless of where these kids end up, i suspect that the academic tools they develop and the people they become serve them very well in college and beyond. that is what you are paying for, not which bumper sticker you get to put on your car.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was a bottom half. Although there is no class rank so there is no way to know for sure. I went to a top 10 SLAC and an even better grad school. Obviously things have changed since then but my sense is the 50-75% group is going to Michigan, Kenyon, Dickinson, Trinity, UMD, etc. Not sure about the bottom quartile - probably a tier below. That's based on a totally unscientific study of where some of the recent grads we know have gone. Big state schools can be a challenge for places like Sidwell where Bs are not uncommon. GPAs/scores will be important and the Sidwell name won't mean much when they are processing 20-30,000 applications. A 3.0 will look like a 3.0.
Although not much is certain in life, I'm pretty sure the UMD admissions folks are familiar with the Sidwell name. I think we need to factor in that, while it's true that Big 3 schools have punishing workloads, kids in area publics who are taking 8-12 APs also have punishing workloads (I happen to have seen both sides). So faced with 30,000 applicants, of whom maybe 10,000 (wild guess here, but for argument's sake) can demonstrate punishing workloads, I'm guessing UMD made the same calculation any Ivy with 30,000 applicants would make, which is to draw mainly from the large pool of valedictorians and 10 percenters and NMSSFs that are in the applicant pool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was a bottom half. Although there is no class rank so there is no way to know for sure. I went to a top 10 SLAC and an even better grad school. Obviously things have changed since then but my sense is the 50-75% group is going to Michigan, Kenyon, Dickinson, Trinity, UMD, etc. Not sure about the bottom quartile - probably a tier below. That's based on a totally unscientific study of where some of the recent grads we know have gone. Big state schools can be a challenge for places like Sidwell where Bs are not uncommon. GPAs/scores will be important and the Sidwell name won't mean much when they are processing 20-30,000 applications. A 3.0 will look like a 3.0.
This is correct. As a 15-20%-er at Sidwell I went to a non-HYP Ivy.
Anonymous wrote:11What make syou think " bottom half student" indicates C's. My DS attends another school , and just about his entire class gets all A's''
I'm a Sidwell parent. A very, very small group of kids have all As. Kids in the bottom half of the class usually still have very strong SAT scores. I think I read somewhere on this site that Sidwell averages 700 on SAT scores. That seems relatively accurate from what I have seen.