Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP. We are in a neighborhood currently zoned to W-L that is more likely than most to be rezoned to Wakefield and when I say I am okay with it I mean it. Don't put words into my mouth.
Talk is cheap.
You are an idiot. So glad my kids don't go to school with yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think this is a very thoughtful post and I agree with it. I don't think the poster is biased toward W-L but rather pointing out some things that people who only know the schools by test scores/street rep may not already know. I went to Yorktown and now live in a neighborhood currently zoned for W-L. I would be happy with either one and frankly with Wakefield as well.
Usually when someone prefaces a comment with the word "frankly" it means they are about to dissemble. This seems like a good example. I will be convinced that Arlington residents would be happy with Wakefield when APS proposes to move Yorktown or W-L students there, and their parents say "great - when can we move." Until then, it's cheap talk. I'd try to move as close to Yorktown as possible.
I am the PP. We are in a neighborhood currently zoned to W-L that is more likely than most to be rezoned to Wakefield and when I say I am okay with it I mean it. Don't put words into my mouth.
Talk is cheap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And the articles and columns by the idiot that wants to bus all the poor kids North and all the rich kids South to achieve "diversity" in every school.
Yeah. That guy is ridiculous. Let's do away with neighborhood schools and bus everyone so that each school has demographic parity. Unreal.
Anonymous wrote:
And the articles and columns by the idiot that wants to bus all the poor kids North and all the rich kids South to achieve "diversity" in every school.
Anonymous wrote:W-L is an excellent High School. It has more varied demographics--compare kids of same socioeconomic backgrounds at W-L and Yorktown and they are indistinguishable.
Disclaimer- we chose W-L because we wanted our kids to go to a public school like we did---not all rich kids. Going to school with and making friends with truly polar backgrounds was a very positive experience for us. This is another we moved from DC and didn't go the private route over there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And speaking of boundaries, how are the HS in Arlington supposed to be redistricted? Anybody knows what it's looking like? We are currently zoned for W-L, and I would very much like to keep it that way.
Who knows what APS will come up with. But I wouldn't assume anything. Yorktown and W-L neighborhoods could go to Wakefield. We've all seen the population projections for the N Arlington high schools.
Anonymous wrote:And speaking of boundaries, how are the HS in Arlington supposed to be redistricted? Anybody knows what it's looking like? We are currently zoned for W-L, and I would very much like to keep it that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W-L is an excellent High School. It has more varied demographics--compare kids of same socioeconomic backgrounds at W-L and Yorktown and they are indistinguishable.
Disclaimer- we chose W-L because we wanted our kids to go to a public school like we did---not all rich kids. Going to school with and making friends with truly polar backgrounds was a very positive experience for us. This is another we moved from DC and didn't go the private route over there.
Let's the cut the BS. The majority of people don't chose the top rated schools because of housing costs.
uote]
You are a fucking idiot. Housing costs are expensive in good zones. People move for schools which is why Langley/McLean have rich populations and inner city DC poor.
Who's the idiot here? PP was just saying the housing costs in the areas zoned for the top schools are higher than most people can afford.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W-L is an excellent High School. It has more varied demographics--compare kids of same socioeconomic backgrounds at W-L and Yorktown and they are indistinguishable.
Disclaimer- we chose W-L because we wanted our kids to go to a public school like we did---not all rich kids. Going to school with and making friends with truly polar backgrounds was a very positive experience for us. This is another we moved from DC and didn't go the private route over there.
Let's the cut the BS. The majority of people don't chose the top rated schools because of housing costs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think this is a very thoughtful post and I agree with it. I don't think the poster is biased toward W-L but rather pointing out some things that people who only know the schools by test scores/street rep may not already know. I went to Yorktown and now live in a neighborhood currently zoned for W-L. I would be happy with either one and frankly with Wakefield as well.
Usually when someone prefaces a comment with the word "frankly" it means they are about to dissemble. This seems like a good example. I will be convinced that Arlington residents would be happy with Wakefield when APS proposes to move Yorktown or W-L students there, and their parents say "great - when can we move." Until then, it's cheap talk. I'd try to move as close to Yorktown as possible.
I am the PP. We are in a neighborhood currently zoned to W-L that is more likely than most to be rezoned to Wakefield and when I say I am okay with it I mean it. Don't put words into my mouth.
Anonymous wrote:The only people who complain about greatschools are the ones that refuse to believe the negative realites of their school. Perhaps the ranking should be a wake up call, the rankings breakdown the deficiencies by grade and then by subject. If it were only an esl issue why would math and science be low as well ? Would you propose emitting the lower performer esl students from the rankings, if so the scores would not change much because the higher rated ones would rate even higher and the scores are comparative not rated by threshold.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think this is a very thoughtful post and I agree with it. I don't think the poster is biased toward W-L but rather pointing out some things that people who only know the schools by test scores/street rep may not already know. I went to Yorktown and now live in a neighborhood currently zoned for W-L. I would be happy with either one and frankly with Wakefield as well.
Usually when someone prefaces a comment with the word "frankly" it means they are about to dissemble. This seems like a good example. I will be convinced that Arlington residents would be happy with Wakefield when APS proposes to move Yorktown or W-L students there, and their parents say "great - when can we move." Until then, it's cheap talk. I'd try to move as close to Yorktown as possible.
Anonymous wrote:W-L is an excellent High School. It has more varied demographics--compare kids of same socioeconomic backgrounds at W-L and Yorktown and they are indistinguishable.
Disclaimer- we chose W-L because we wanted our kids to go to a public school like we did---not all rich kids. Going to school with and making friends with truly polar backgrounds was a very positive experience for us. This is another we moved from DC and didn't go the private route over there.