Anonymous wrote:I'll let you do all that as it sounds like you are far more passionate about it than I. Safe and legal first tri abortions are pretty widely available in the US; I've lived in places where they are not.
Anonymous wrote:I'll let you do all that as it sounds like you are far more passionate about it than I. Safe and legal first tri abortions are pretty widely available in the US; I've lived in places where they are not.
Anonymous wrote:I'll let you do all that as it sounds like you are far more passionate about it than I. Safe and legal first tri abortions are pretty widely available in the US; I've lived in places where they are not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do find it weird that technology has helped so many premature babies to be viable and thrive, of the same gestation age or younger than fetuses can be excised via partial-birth abortion. Anyone else find that overlap uncomfortable?
Not really. I have a lot of ethical questions about what "viability" and "thriving" actually are; for every 23 week preemie that is a "success" story, there are how many who end up with a quality of life that not many of us would choose. Moreover, second tri abortions aren't very common. If they make you uncomfortable, be aware that there is some evidence that barriers to first tri abortions increase the amount of second term abortions.
They make me incredibly uncomfortable. When babies are capable of yawning and cuddling and kissing (twins) in the womb, I don't see crushing their heads to pull them out without being uncomfortable. Barriers to abortion are so minimal in this country, unless you are underage I suppose. If that is what is increasing the amount of second term abortions, I respect that person less. I do think first tri abortions should be legal, the earlier the better-ie day after pill.
I do think first tri abortions should be legal, the earlier the better-ie day after pill.
Barriers to abortion are so minimal in this country, unless you are underage I suppose.
If that is what is increasing the amount of second term abortions, I respect that person less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do find it weird that technology has helped so many premature babies to be viable and thrive, of the same gestation age or younger than fetuses can be excised via partial-birth abortion. Anyone else find that overlap uncomfortable?
Not really. I have a lot of ethical questions about what "viability" and "thriving" actually are; for every 23 week preemie that is a "success" story, there are how many who end up with a quality of life that not many of us would choose. Moreover, second tri abortions aren't very common. If they make you uncomfortable, be aware that there is some evidence that barriers to first tri abortions increase the amount of second term abortions.
Anonymous wrote:So we make an exception for the life of the mother. That position is entirely consistent with pro-life beliefs. It is a monumental rarity that the life of the child/fetus/zygote actually poses a risk to the mother. But even the Pope would agree that a mother is not required to risk her life in order to give birth.
But hey...the fact that millions of babies in this country have been aborted because a pregnancy is inconvenient, that is OK with you guys. Whatever.
Here's this too, an actual majority of those babies are racial minorities. So this great champion of the underclass, Planned Parenthood, has a program in place that disparately targets for death little Afican American and minority babies. Yeah, it is the conservatives that are racists.
I'm done talking with you. This is not a productive conversation for either of us. You can assume I'm afraid to engage you and you hear the "crickets". Its actually that it is boring.
Signed,
An Anti Choicer