Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the replies on here, it seems that having different schools for Elem., MS and HS seems alright, but anything more would be disruptive?
Parents of teens, please correct me if I am wrong..
I can only speak from personal experience but I moved schools quite a bit. Some because we moved in this area and some because we moved out of the country. I did k-1, 2-3, 4, 5-8 and 9-12 at different schools (and not feeder schools, totally different schools). It was fine. When I lived overseas many of the kids were military brats who moved every 2 years. It was seen to be the norm. 2 years is a lifetime for kids.
My kids both moved for HS and it worked out really well. I would not discount the ability to reinvent oneself after the awkward middle school years. They made great friends in new high schools.
I appreciate your perspective, but mine is different. I am a counselor and work with young adults, many of whom were military brats and moved a lot as kids and teens. Many tell me that the constant moving was emotionally and socially difficult for them, and feel they are still dealing with the consequences of that. I'm sure there are plenty of exceptions, but I thought I'd mention this.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.. Just curious - in general, are high school magnets/test-in schools (like TJ) better than high school privates? Or should I compare them on a 1 on 1 basis?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the replies on here, it seems that having different schools for Elem., MS and HS seems alright, but anything more would be disruptive?
Parents of teens, please correct me if I am wrong..
I can only speak from personal experience but I moved schools quite a bit. Some because we moved in this area and some because we moved out of the country. I did k-1, 2-3, 4, 5-8 and 9-12 at different schools (and not feeder schools, totally different schools). It was fine. When I lived overseas many of the kids were military brats who moved every 2 years. It was seen to be the norm. 2 years is a lifetime for kids.
My kids both moved for HS and it worked out really well. I would not discount the ability to reinvent oneself after the awkward middle school years. They made great friends in new high schools.
Anonymous wrote:From the replies on here, it seems that having different schools for Elem., MS and HS seems alright, but anything more would be disruptive?
Parents of teens, please correct me if I am wrong..
Anonymous wrote:Friends are so important at that age, and if I could avoid disruptions in grades 7-12 I probably would do so.
Agree passionately!! I'm always startled to see this near-universal developmental reality get such short shrift on the Schools fora.
ie, "oh, we'll just move to this private, and if that's Not Working Academically, we'll move in 2 years to that private, then it's always a good idea to keep reassessing every year to see if (academics) Are Working, so if not, we can keep moving, la la la." Or "we'll live in a cheaper 'hood and do charter for K-x and then move to a new home miles away to Arlington/MoCo for a strong high school ...."
seriously, please tell me you've seen that on here about 1,000 times. With few exceptions, these are always parents of 4 year olds promising to move the kids every 36 months. And the parents who have actually pre-teens and teens always point out that any move was a teen-driven decision, usually for sports or social reasons. But never because "it's better to go private for 10th - 12th grade since they have better [something academic] and I decided to unilaterally pull my 14 year old out of his school and send him to a different high school."
sorry, whew. But I wish more posters in these theoretical conversations kept this reality in mind.
Friends are so important at that age, and if I could avoid disruptions in grades 7-12 I probably would do so.