Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama would have to frame my mother for murder before I voted for Romney.

Literally laughing out loud at this one. Thank you.

Yet both of you would likely view any voter who made such a statement and held similarly biased views towards Romney as uninformed, poorly read, ignorant or worse.

Are you actually making fun of the Bataan Death March? That is so fucking not cool. Do you know what those men, women and children, military and civilians both, had to endure over years starving and diseased in an enemy prison camp? Can you even imagine?

And Americorps was created by Bill Clinton and found worthy enough to be expanded by George W. Bush. Try again.

Sorry, Wrong social engineering initiative.

I was thinking of the, "The Give Act" as orginally proposed by team Obama circa 2008-2009. The forced invigorating volunteerism part of it somehow all died along with Obama's proposal to cut the allowed federal deductions to charities that was proposed back then as well (which turned out to be a good thing for Romney. Damn people giving their money to charities instead of the government...).

http://www.wnd.com/2009/03/92902/
Congress appears ready to pass an Obama administration plan that could create mandatory public service requirements for all American youth, fulfilling a campaign promise.

The bill, HR 1388: The Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act, otherwise known as the “GIVE Act,” has already passed the House by a vote of 321-105.

Anonymous wrote: Romney now strikes me as a republican Bill Clinton. And I mean that in a good way. If he wins I feel he will end this partisan bickering and get some good things accomplished.

I'm literally laughing out loud about this. That's what people thought about Bush and look how that turned out!

No brainer for me. Obama all the way!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict DC will go 80%+ for Obama-- like usual.

Would you expect any less out of a parasitic town that suckles off the tit of the federal government- both rich amd poor alike?

Well, in that case, we should all vote Republican, since they're the ones who increase government spending the most.

You mean besides heading off a second Great Depression?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Romney out-debated Obama, but I disagree with the fundamentals of Romney's policies so I will still vote for Obama.

Agreed. I don't place much weight in what is said in a debate...it's all pandering. You can deliver zingers or talk articulate all you like...if your policies don't agreed with my life, I'm not voting for you.

Obama's entire presidency has been catchy zingers, slogans, hope change green main street etc. All gum flapping, no action, except Obamacare that is shutting down small health practices across the country and imposing health care taxes on the poor and middle class who remain without healthcare, and hummm - what did he do other than Obamacare? Oh those billions for the green companies that contribute to his campaign. Yeah, that's it.

Are you actually making fun of the Bataan Death March? That is so fucking not cool. Do you know what those men, women and children, military and civilians both, had to endure over years starving and diseased in an enemy prison camp? Can you even imagine?

And Americorps was created by Bill Clinton and found worthy enough to be expanded by George W. Bush. Try again.

Are you new here? This message board is about as left leaning as they come. Obama could send the 1%ers on a Bataan Death March and they'd still be shrills for him.

Yes. Very true.

This march idea sounds like a good idea. Thinking about it more, you just need to roll it up into Obama's old Ameri-corps proposal and call it the progressive march for peace, tolerance and a substainable earth. The "Fairness March" just needs to be branded properly.

Anonymous wrote: Romney now strikes me as a republican Bill Clinton. And I mean that in a good way. If he wins I feel he will end this partisan bickering and get some good things accomplished.

As a former MA resident from the Romney years, let's be clear on one thing: All Romney ever did as governor was sign the laws that the Democratic majority wrote and passed. He managed not to get in the way of education or health care reform because he has zero capacity for political leadership. This is exactly what Republicans want him to do in the White House. If he's the next Ronald Reagan, then I must be the second coming of Jesus.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Romney out-debated Obama, but I disagree with the fundamentals of Romney's policies so I will still vote for Obama.

Agreed. I don't place much weight in what is said in a debate...it's all pandering. You can deliver zingers or talk articulate all you like...if your policies don't agreed with my life, I'm not voting for you.

Which is why debates rarely actually impact an actual election but the media needs a story so they'll tell you Romney won this one in the hopes it keeps the race artificially close

Anonymous wrote:Romney out-debated Obama, but I disagree with the fundamentals of Romney's policies so I will still vote for Obama.

Agreed. I don't place much weight in what is said in a debate...it's all pandering. You can deliver zingers or talk articulate all you like...if your policies don't agreed with my life, I'm not voting for you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moved me to Romney. Obama looked like a scared child...sorry.

sock puppet?

Why? Because you can't believe there might actually be people who don't bow down to Obama at every chance?

Mitt says he loves this country.

But Mitt kills everything he says he loves.

Don't vote for Mitt.

Anonymous wrote:Romney out-debated Obama, but I disagree with the fundamentals of Romney's policies so I will still vote for Obama.

23:41 here - +1