Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would never have kids and then give them to someone else to raise when they are 3 months old unless I HAD to. And if I valued independence then a job is the last thing I would have. You know I might actually try to be independent as opposed to dependent on a job and someone else to raise my kids.
I SAH and this makes no sense. Unless you saved your own $$ pre-kids to live off of, or inherited it, or won it, how can you not work, and yet be independent? I get that you want to raise your own kids full time. But how do you propose that w/o working yourself or being supported by someone else who works?
You do not understand the previous post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would never have kids and then give them to someone else to raise when they are 3 months old unless I HAD to. And if I valued independence then a job is the last thing I would have. You know I might actually try to be independent as opposed to dependent on a job and someone else to raise my kids.
I SAH and this makes no sense. Unless you saved your own $$ pre-kids to live off of, or inherited it, or won it, how can you not work, and yet be independent? I get that you want to raise your own kids full time. But how do you propose that w/o working yourself or being supported by someone else who works?
Anonymous wrote:I would never have kids and then give them to someone else to raise when they are 3 months old unless I HAD to. And if I valued independence then a job is the last thing I would have. You know I might actually try to be independent as opposed to dependent on a job and someone else to raise my kids.
Anonymous wrote:I would never have kids and then give them to someone else to raise when they are 3 months old unless I HAD to. And if I valued independence then a job is the last thing I would have. You know I might actually try to be independent as opposed to dependent on a job and someone else to raise my kids.
Anonymous wrote:I would never have kids and then give them to someone else to raise when they are 3 months old unless I HAD to. And if I valued independence then a job is the last thing I would have. You know I might actually try to be independent as opposed to dependent on a job and someone else to raise my kids.[/quote
Three snaps in a circle, you go girl!
good point!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No amount of DH's salary would persuade me to deal with the drudgery and boredom of child care & housework.
Don't want to deal with a shift in our relationship if DH has all of the economic power. Ugh.
+1
It's not just about money - it's about independence and relationship dynamics.
DON'T. DO. IT.
love thisAnonymous wrote:I would only stay home if I had enough money in the bank to live off the rest of my life. in my name. I love my husband, but power corrupts even saints.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mine just bumped up $100k from $300k this week and I still wold NEVER give up my job. I make $150k WAH on an incredibly flexible schedule for the Federal govt. I a17 years in with tons of leave too. I work only when my kids are in elem. school. I possibly would bump down to part time--but I will always have income and benefits. I was raised to have this mindset.
Lucky you. If I were in your position and DH made $1million a year I would probably still work. But aren't you already only part time if you only work while your kids are in school?
Btw, don't pay yourself too hard on the back for your "mindset." You've got a great gig that most people would kill for, regardless of what their husbands make.
Signed,
A SAHM because my profession imploded. Not because of my "mindset."
Agreed. Many SAHMs and FT WOHMs would kill to have that setup, but don't have the option.