Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:In pure Mittens style, he artificially inflated his tax rate. He didn't take the deduction on $1.75 million in 2011 charitable donations. Otherwise, his rate would have been less than 12%.
Previously, Romney said that if he paid more taxes than were required, he wouldn't be qualified to be president. So, I guess we should take him at his word.
I found this strange as well. I also love how they are spinning the "he gave 30% of this income to charity", without mentioning that the charity is the Mormon church and that the "donation" is not exactly "voluntary".
What makes you think it is all the the Church?
Because its right there on this tax return - statement 4. He gave $1,115,484 to the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints the other $200K went to an outfit called the Tyler Foundation. So, Mitt gave $200K to charity in 2011.
Giving money to the church is not the same as giving it to "charity". The church of course can and does use donations for a variety of things. Some are charitable causes and some are not. For just one example, the LDS church used donations to fight proposition 8 in California. That has nothing at all to do with charity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:In pure Mittens style, he artificially inflated his tax rate. He didn't take the deduction on $1.75 million in 2011 charitable donations. Otherwise, his rate would have been less than 12%.
Previously, Romney said that if he paid more taxes than were required, he wouldn't be qualified to be president. So, I guess we should take him at his word.
I found this strange as well. I also love how they are spinning the "he gave 30% of this income to charity", without mentioning that the charity is the Mormon church and that the "donation" is not exactly "voluntary".
What makes you think it is all the the Church?
Because its right there on this tax return - statement 4. He gave $1,115,484 to the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints the other $200K went to an outfit called the Tyler Foundation. So, Mitt gave $200K to charity in 2011.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guess everyone here will just gloss over Romney's $4 million in charitable contributions. Maybe if he gave $5,300 like the cheap SOB Biden this would get more play.
More fun to just call him Mittens, well done.
When you have over $10million in unearned income, I don't think it's that big of a deal to give $4 million to charity. Much of that money went to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, which requires its members to give at least 10% of their income, so one might not even consider it a voluntary contribution.
The Obamas and Biden's each had significantly less than a tenth of Romney's income. Any attempt to draw comparisons between their finances and Romney's is untenable.
mmmmmmm Kool Aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guess everyone here will just gloss over Romney's $4 million in charitable contributions. Maybe if he gave $5,300 like the cheap SOB Biden this would get more play.
More fun to just call him Mittens, well done.
When you have over $10million in unearned income, I don't think it's that big of a deal to give $4 million to charity. Much of that money went to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, which requires its members to give at least 10% of their income, so one might not even consider it a voluntary contribution.
The Obamas and Biden's each had significantly less than a tenth of Romney's income. Any attempt to draw comparisons between their finances and Romney's is untenable.
Is your 401k also unearned income? Or is that a "qualified" investment. Risk v. Reward....chump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guess everyone here will just gloss over Romney's $4 million in charitable contributions. Maybe if he gave $5,300 like the cheap SOB Biden this would get more play.
More fun to just call him Mittens, well done.
When you have over $10million in unearned income, I don't think it's that big of a deal to give $4 million to charity. Much of that money went to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, which requires its members to give at least 10% of their income, so one might not even consider it a voluntary contribution.
The Obamas and Biden's each had significantly less than a tenth of Romney's income. Any attempt to draw comparisons between their finances and Romney's is untenable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guess everyone here will just gloss over Romney's $4 million in charitable contributions. Maybe if he gave $5,300 like the cheap SOB Biden this would get more play.
More fun to just call him Mittens, well done.
When you have over $10million in unearned income, I don't think it's that big of a deal to give $4 million to charity. Much of that money went to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, which requires its members to give at least 10% of their income, so one might not even consider it a voluntary contribution.
The Obamas and Biden's each had significantly less than a tenth of Romney's income. Any attempt to draw comparisons between their finances and Romney's is untenable.
Anonymous wrote:Guess everyone here will just gloss over Romney's $4 million in charitable contributions. Maybe if he gave $5,300 like the cheap SOB Biden this would get more play.
More fun to just call him Mittens, well done.
Anonymous wrote:Guess everyone here will just gloss over Romney's $4 million in charitable contributions. Maybe if he gave $5,300 like the cheap SOB Biden this would get more play.
More fun to just call him Mittens, well done.
IF you don't like mittens, how about Waffles?Anonymous wrote:For me, it's not an aversion to nicknames; it's just that I find "Mittens" rather meaningless. I would prefer something apt, say if someone could find a fitting acronym for M. Romney. Anyone for Mr. Money?
Anonymous wrote:If you file an extension the year you run for president, you should be disqualified. You can't even apply for effing financial aid until your returns are complete.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:In pure Mittens style, he artificially inflated his tax rate. He didn't take the deduction on $1.75 million in 2011 charitable donations. Otherwise, his rate would have been less than 12%.
Previously, Romney said that if he paid more taxes than were required, he wouldn't be qualified to be president. So, I guess we should take him at his word.
We like to call him "Mittens" because it makes us feel smart and clever. We live in Washington, DC you know.
jsteele wrote:In pure Mittens style, he artificially inflated his tax rate. He didn't take the deduction on $1.75 million in 2011 charitable donations. Otherwise, his rate would have been less than 12%.
Previously, Romney said that if he paid more taxes than were required, he wouldn't be qualified to be president. So, I guess we should take him at his word.
Anonymous wrote:If you file an extension the year you run for president, you should be disqualified. You can't even apply for effing financial aid until your returns are complete.