Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would go extinct. Which is apparently what they want, too, since they are so spectacularly bad at reproducing.
They are too incompetent and lazy to have sex, so tell me why we should be wasting scientific funding on getting a big fat loser raccoon species to bump uglies? And when it inevitably doesn't happen, why are we spending more research money to artificially knock these craptacular dopes up? It's not like we can ever release them back into the wild, because they'll just promptly go extinct due to their middle-school-nerd level prowess with the opposite sex. So it's not like we're doing anything other than preserving an expensive, shitty, perpetually-owned-by-China zoo freeloader. I'd rather spend that money and resources on one of the hundreds of animal species that go extinct every day that would actually attempt NOT to go extinct, if given the chance.
P.S. I'm a bleeding-heart liberal and I love animals. I just F*CKING HATE PANDAS.
I agree, they're nothing but welfare bears. They aren't that cute, too lazy to hunt (unless you consider bamboo prey) and I heard they smell like a combination of menthol cigarettes and potato salad.
Yes. This. All this. A thousand times this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate cats.
A good house cat can be a valuable thing to have around. We are mouse and cave cricket free year round.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would go extinct. Which is apparently what they want, too, since they are so spectacularly bad at reproducing.
They are too incompetent and lazy to have sex, so tell me why we should be wasting scientific funding on getting a big fat loser raccoon species to bump uglies? And when it inevitably doesn't happen, why are we spending more research money to artificially knock these craptacular dopes up? It's not like we can ever release them back into the wild, because they'll just promptly go extinct due to their middle-school-nerd level prowess with the opposite sex. So it's not like we're doing anything other than preserving an expensive, shitty, perpetually-owned-by-China zoo freeloader. I'd rather spend that money and resources on one of the hundreds of animal species that go extinct every day that would actually attempt NOT to go extinct, if given the chance.
P.S. I'm a bleeding-heart liberal and I love animals. I just F*CKING HATE PANDAS.
I agree, they're nothing but welfare bears. They aren't that cute, too lazy to hunt (unless you consider bamboo prey) and I heard they smell like a combination of menthol cigarettes and potato salad.
. Love FU penguin. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would go extinct. Which is apparently what they want, too, since they are so spectacularly bad at reproducing.
They are too incompetent and lazy to have sex, so tell me why we should be wasting scientific funding on getting a big fat loser raccoon species to bump uglies? And when it inevitably doesn't happen, why are we spending more research money to artificially knock these craptacular dopes up? It's not like we can ever release them back into the wild, because they'll just promptly go extinct due to their middle-school-nerd level prowess with the opposite sex. So it's not like we're doing anything other than preserving an expensive, shitty, perpetually-owned-by-China zoo freeloader. I'd rather spend that money and resources on one of the hundreds of animal species that go extinct every day that would actually attempt NOT to go extinct, if given the chance.
P.S. I'm a bleeding-heart liberal and I love animals. I just F*CKING HATE PANDAS.
+1

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate cats.
A good house cat can be a valuable thing to have around. We are mouse and cave cricket free year round.
Anonymous wrote:I hate how the white fur around their butts is always brown.
Anonymous wrote:I hate cats.