Anonymous wrote:
Sure, it's a preference. But your need to live with more space might anger some people because it uses large quantities of finite resources and contributes more than a smaller house would to climate change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3000 SQRFT is still a bit small i would say 3500-4000
Who ARE you people? And the 5,000 sf poster? Seriously!
? Why are you angry? Some of us prefer to live with more space. I would say 10,000 would be ridiculous, 3000-5000 isnt that big.
Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a 2400 sf house with one sibling, and it never seemed cramped (and we didn't even have a finished basement). The house was well designed, with plenty of closet and cabinet space. I think storage and a smart floor plan are key--way more important than having a media room or 5000 sf.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have family abroad that comes to stay so we need room for them too- basement?
Only if it's walk-out. It's illegal to use basements without proper windows as a bedroom.
Anonymous wrote:We have family abroad that comes to stay so we need room for them too- basement?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3000 SQRFT is still a bit small i would say 3500-4000
Who ARE you people? And the 5,000 sf poster? Seriously!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3000 SQRFT is still a bit small i would say 3500-4000
Who ARE you people? And the 5,000 sf poster? Seriously!
Do you mean 5000 above grade or including a finished basement? If above grade, that would be 7000+ total living space and that seems excessive for a family of 5.
Including a finished basement with media and exercise rooms and a guest bedroom. Maybe we'll downsize later; maybe not.

Anonymous wrote:I think, for close-in DC, 2000 sq ft plus a finished basement is reasonable for an upper-middle class family with 3 boys. Agree with PP that a lot has to do with well-designed spaces and flow. (Those who need 2500 sq ft + need to expose themselves to better architectural design and get acquainted with urban residential reality.)
3000 sq ft+ is really for people who either have a lot of $$$ and can afford large homes close-in, or who are willing to spend more time on commute. On the latter, I would take into consideration--as your boys get older--the fact that they will have to DRIVE if you want more space vs urban location. Do you really want your high school boys spending that much time on the road just to see friends and get to school/activities? There's a good reason why car insurance rates are highest for teenage boys--they are the most likely to get into fatal car crashes. And, when you add another teenage passenger to the car, statistics show that the rates for car accidents for teen drives increases dramatically. No, thank you.