Anonymous
Post 08/27/2012 08:52     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

I don't mind Audrey or Christina, of those three.
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2012 08:41     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Lark has way too many negatives. It sounds like you decided to have a child on a lark. And once the child becomes old enough, endless teasing.
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2012 08:32     Subject: Re:Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

I like Christina and Audrey, but absolute no to Lark. Did you make it up - I've never heard it before?
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2012 08:26     Subject: Re:Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

The only one I like is Christina, but it's kinda over used.
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2012 02:05     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Anonymous wrote:Love: Audrey
Like: Christina
Hate: lark


+1
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2012 01:48     Subject: Re:Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

I know a girl named Larkin
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2012 00:01     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Michelle is the best female name hands down.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 23:40     Subject: Re:Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Audrey is classic and elegant, Christina is beautiful.

I don't like Lark. It's short, and harsh, and a bird. I want my daughter to have a name to aspire to, not one associated with a cute brainless creature.

Willa is OK, I don't love it, but it's legitimate and not a bird.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 23:35     Subject: Re:Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

I will disagree with the other PPs and say that I think Lark is a darling name. Willa sounds like the name of a fat girl with acne to me. Reminds me of Wilford. Wilford Brimley actually.


Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 22:24     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Anonymous wrote:They are all horrid. How about anabella, michaela, saraphine, kai, ariel,or clementine?


WTF?
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 22:24     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They are all horrid. How about anabella, michaela, saraphine, kai, ariel,or clementine?


Collectively, that is the ugliest group of names I've ever heard. Michaela? Barf. It's almost as bad as Lark.

OP - you've got a tidy little group here, and there's consensus: Lark is pretty bad. Why not Willa as PP suggests? You almost sound like the mother who wanted to name her defenseless child Journey. Both names are hugely conspicuous. Like Holden for a boy.


Yes, truly awful.

Kai is the name of the red ninja in Lego Ninjago.

Every boy in her elementary class will know that she is a master on spinjistu if you name your daughter Kai
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 22:20     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Lark....Flowers In The Attic. Soap opera character.
Christina...I think this is an ok classic religious name.
Audrey...Fine. Not great.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 22:20     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Audrey was in our short list for girls' names but had a boy. I've met a handful of babies/toddlers with that name lately.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 22:16     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Anonymous wrote:They are all horrid. How about anabella, michaela, saraphine, kai, ariel,or clementine?


Collectively, that is the ugliest group of names I've ever heard. Michaela? Barf. It's almost as bad as Lark.

OP - you've got a tidy little group here, and there's consensus: Lark is pretty bad. Why not Willa as PP suggests? You almost sound like the mother who wanted to name her defenseless child Journey. Both names are hugely conspicuous. Like Holden for a boy.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2012 22:07     Subject: Please tell me what you think of these three names for girls:

Anonymous wrote:Christina is classic, and not over used for the current generation.



actually, that's not a bad point. Names seem to cycle over about 3 generations. The names that were popular when we were kids have fallen out of favor, yet the names of our grandmothers are back in style. I was the PP who said my daughter's name is not even in the top 1000 names right now - it was pretty popular in the 80s. Boys names we like are very 80s, but are no longer popular.

Use names from our generation and you likely will not have 5 of them in your kid's preschool or in your neighborhood.