Anonymous wrote:7:02 here: Of course it is in ones constitutional right to defend against a ticket. But, we are talking about a ticket. Use it as a learning experience. And the reason to go to court is not to beat the ticket, but to hear what happens in traffic court.
My suggestion has nothing to do with techniques from less expenses, either in ticket or insurance, but rather to make him a safer driver.
When I was a teen (and not all are like me, of course), I drove fast. It was going to court after my second ticket (first, mom was in the car, and she admitted she would have gotten it too) and I heard what was going on....everyone guilty, the severity of the sentences (usually DUI), etc. For me, I realized the potential impact, and slowed down. That was 30 years ago, and I remember it like it was yesterday.
Anonymous wrote:I think the difference is that the language of "getting a lawyer to work the ticket" sounds like trying to get out of the natural consequences of the crime.
Anonymous wrote:I have a different suggestion. He got a ticket because he was speeding. Which is a violation of the law. Make him go to court. If you can get a plea deal fine, but make him sit in the court room for the session. Here what is happening to other people. It could make him a more careful driver. (I am not saying is is not careful....but there is always room for improvement).
Use it as a lesson in driving. Speed limits seem like they are for revenue enhancement, but often there are other reasons, like enhanced pedestrian traffic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For your insurances sake you better get that fixed.
So have him take the driver improvement course and go to court? I don't know how to "fix" it as best as I can. This happened in Fairfax County.
DS has an otherwise clean record. Who knows what actually happened, but I don't think the officer was doing DS any favors (as a pp suggested) as this stretch of road is all 35mph and oddly goes to 25 for a bit. It's a known speed trap location but a new road to DS (who took a wrong turn in a fork in the road . . . ). The officer also didn't offer to show the speed on radar (is that required or a myth?) and DS called me right after the ticket was issued and said the officer said he was going 40 mph but when DS got home and I read the ticket, it said 44 (DS said no one ever said 44). All of this is not good for anything, but just background to why I think the officer wasn't doing any favors.