Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster, I swear. I don't actually like the russian gymnasts. I prefer the strong, solid Americans.
Gymnastics is interesting to me because it so mirrors society in terms of not really knowing how to deal with women. As a sport, gymnasts hasn't really decided if it's about athleticism, or if it's still about women being lovely. And then there's this whole sexualized aspect to it (the skimpy uniforms) that's mixed with the keeping the "girls" young - the underdeveloped female bodies, the ponytails, calling them girls.
It's less obvious in the Olympics, at the highest caliber of sport. But I've been to a few meets at the collegiate level - some of the women look so awkward trying to do the required "dance" moves.
I think they really can't decide if it's about strength or not.
All uniforms for all sports are getting skimpier
And gymnastics has probably changed the least. The differences from gymnastics leotards from Nadia's age or even the Atlanta games are better fabrics and more rhinestones/bling.
The leg cut is only very slightly higher, really an insignificant difference.
The other sports uniforms have changed drastically, but not gymnastics leotards.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please shoot whoever requires these girls to waste so much time with the hands movements?! I mean this is why I don't get in to sports at all. ABSOLUTELY STUPID!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster, I swear. I don't actually like the russian gymnasts. I prefer the strong, solid Americans.
Gymnastics is interesting to me because it so mirrors society in terms of not really knowing how to deal with women. As a sport, gymnasts hasn't really decided if it's about athleticism, or if it's still about women being lovely. And then there's this whole sexualized aspect to it (the skimpy uniforms) that's mixed with the keeping the "girls" young - the underdeveloped female bodies, the ponytails, calling them girls.
It's less obvious in the Olympics, at the highest caliber of sport. But I've been to a few meets at the collegiate level - some of the women look so awkward trying to do the required "dance" moves.
I think they really can't decide if it's about strength or not.
All uniforms for all sports are getting skimpier
And gymnastics has probably changed the least. The differences from gymnastics leotards from Nadia's age or even the Atlanta games are better fabrics and more rhinestones/bling.
The leg cut is only very slightly higher, really an insignificant difference.
The other sports uniforms have changed drastically, but not gymnastics leotards.
Anonymous wrote:Do they have a men's version of this where judging is partially based on grace/dancing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster, I swear. I don't actually like the russian gymnasts. I prefer the strong, solid Americans.
Gymnastics is interesting to me because it so mirrors society in terms of not really knowing how to deal with women. As a sport, gymnasts hasn't really decided if it's about athleticism, or if it's still about women being lovely. And then there's this whole sexualized aspect to it (the skimpy uniforms) that's mixed with the keeping the "girls" young - the underdeveloped female bodies, the ponytails, calling them girls.
It's less obvious in the Olympics, at the highest caliber of sport. But I've been to a few meets at the collegiate level - some of the women look so awkward trying to do the required "dance" moves.
I think they really can't decide if it's about strength or not.
All uniforms for all sports are getting skimpier