Anonymous wrote:No one *must* accept homosexuality. But as an American, you *must* oppose discrimination against anyone.
I don't agree with Cathy, and I respect his right to believe whatever he wants. But when he spends millions to deny rights to others, I have a problem with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one *must* accept homosexuality. But as an American, you *must* oppose discrimination against anyone.
Even conservative Christians? I should hope so.
I meant "you must oppose discrimination" even against conservative Christians in my post above.
Because otherwise all this is "ACCEPT EVERONE!...except anyone who disagreed with me."
Yes, you must oppose discrimination against Christians, and I do. I don't think Cathy's views are in any way Christian, but that's another argument.
I am grateful when people with his views take full advantage of their right to free speech. It sets them apart, and leads to discussions like this one, which inevitably move the needle a little further toward equal rights for all. Because once you listen to someone like him, most thinking people are eager to move to the other side of the fence.
equal rights? Do they make the gay customers sit in different areas of the restaurant after checking with their gaydar machine? Do they make them wait behind the non gay customers.
If you google the history of civil rights and what AAs had to endure it's insulting to believe they are the same thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_segregation
Pretty sure Matthew Shephard's mom would challenge you on that. And I personally have been denied a hotel room with one bed when I checked in with my partner.
But even if we gays haven't suffered enough to earn the right to marry in your eyes, there is still no American reason to deny it. There is only your hate and fear and bigotry.
If you oppose equal rights for gay people, you are on the wrong side of history.
Anonymous wrote:
But even if we gays haven't suffered enough to earn the right to marry in your eyes, there is still no American reason to deny it. There is only your hate and fear and bigotry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't. Why should I care what the owner of a fast food restaurant thinks about anything? His beliefs are his. Mine may or may not be different, but who's really to say who is right? Also, I don't think people realize that boycotting Chick-fil-A because of what the Cathy family thinks is not going to matter to the Cathys. They voluntarily close every Sunday of every year, thus missing 53-54 days of profit every single year- because of their beliefs. They're fine not making money on Sundays because they think they're doing what's right. They're also going to be fine not making money from boycotters, because they still think their stance on gay marriage is right!
But it's not just their opinions -- they donate part of the profits of the restaurant to causes that actively oppose things I think are really important. So I don't want my oney to become part of that support.
+1.
They not only donate money to causes I actively oppose, they donate money to causes DEDICATED TO REMOVING PEOPLE'S BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.
It is about the MONEY. Not the opinions, the MONEY.
Anonymous wrote:So, i actually am a bit repulsed by chick fil a's stance and I won't be eating there anymore, but I don't make a big deal about it in public or even on here. I certainly wouldn't tell a friend not to eat there and I'm not above stealing a napkin from them if we're walking by in the mall. But support them by purchasing a product? No. That I will not do.
I also oppose Komen for what they did with planned parenthood and i no longer do the walk or raise any funds for them.
But it seems like people on teh chick fil a thread seem to think no one does these things - makes private consumer or charity choices based on a companies (owner's) beliefs, ethics or actions.
So my question is: do you, privately, make decisions on what to buy, eat, or where based on a companies' actions or statements?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one *must* accept homosexuality. But as an American, you *must* oppose discrimination against anyone.
Even conservative Christians? I should hope so.
I meant "you must oppose discrimination" even against conservative Christians in my post above.
Because otherwise all this is "ACCEPT EVERONE!...except anyone who disagreed with me."
Yes, you must oppose discrimination against Christians, and I do. I don't think Cathy's views are in any way Christian, but that's another argument.
I am grateful when people with his views take full advantage of their right to free speech. It sets them apart, and leads to discussions like this one, which inevitably move the needle a little further toward equal rights for all. Because once you listen to someone like him, most thinking people are eager to move to the other side of the fence.
equal rights? Do they make the gay customers sit in different areas of the restaurant after checking with their gaydar machine? Do they make them wait behind the non gay customers.
If you google the history of civil rights and what AAs had to endure it's insulting to believe they are the same thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_segregation
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one *must* accept homosexuality. But as an American, you *must* oppose discrimination against anyone.
Even conservative Christians? I should hope so.
I meant "you must oppose discrimination" even against conservative Christians in my post above.
Because otherwise all this is "ACCEPT EVERONE!...except anyone who disagreed with me."
Yes, you must oppose discrimination against Christians, and I do. I don't think Cathy's views are in any way Christian, but that's another argument.
I am grateful when people with his views take full advantage of their right to free speech. It sets them apart, and leads to discussions like this one, which inevitably move the needle a little further toward equal rights for all. Because once you listen to someone like him, most thinking people are eager to move to the other side of the fence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one *must* accept homosexuality. But as an American, you *must* oppose discrimination against anyone.
Even conservative Christians? I should hope so.
I meant "you must oppose discrimination" even against conservative Christians in my post above.
Because otherwise all this is "ACCEPT EVERONE!...except anyone who disagreed with me."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one *must* accept homosexuality. But as an American, you *must* oppose discrimination against anyone.
Even conservative Christians? I should hope so.
Anonymous wrote:No one *must* accept homosexuality. But as an American, you *must* oppose discrimination against anyone.