Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about Einstein, Wheaton or Kennedy?
Why aren't THEY on your list?
Because she wants a good education for her kids.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the PP is a pot-stirring asshole. So far the implication is that if we send our kids to Einstein, Wheaton, or Kennedy we don't care about giving our kids a good education or our kids are pregnant gang members. I think these uninformed and bigoted comments would elicit an unfavorable reaction from anyone.
NP here, and I think the Einstein booster is the problem here. Are you suggesting that unless we all agree to send our kids to the school of your choosing, we are by definition racists/elitists/anti-poor? I'll raise you an epithet: facist.
The OP states that she grew up in SS and has direct experience with the local schools. It's her prerogative, and if she really did grow up here then she has a better basis in making that judgment than most parents who are thinking about schools when they buy a house. BTW I don't have kids in either the Whitman or Churchill districts, I just think it's absurd to tell a parent who can afford those districts that buying there de facto makes them racist.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the PP is a pot-stirring asshole. So far the implication is that if we send our kids to Einstein, Wheaton, or Kennedy we don't care about giving our kids a good education or our kids are pregnant gang members. I think these uninformed and bigoted comments would elicit an unfavorable reaction from anyone.
NP here, and I think the Einstein booster is the problem here. Are you suggesting that unless we all agree to send our kids to the school of your choosing, we are by definition racists/elitists/anti-poor? I'll raise you an epithet: facist.
The OP states that she grew up in SS and has direct experience with the local schools. It's her prerogative, and if she really did grow up here then she has a better basis in making that judgment than most parents who are thinking about schools when they buy a house. BTW I don't have kids in either the Whitman or Churchill districts, I just think it's absurd to tell a parent who can afford those districts that buying there de facto makes them racist.
I don't think the PP is a pot-stirring asshole. So far the implication is that if we send our kids to Einstein, Wheaton, or Kennedy we don't care about giving our kids a good education or our kids are pregnant gang members. I think these uninformed and bigoted comments would elicit an unfavorable reaction from anyone.
Anonymous wrote:I think several of the neighborhoods that feed in to Einstein are quite lovely. Hell Einstein has a Kensington address and parts of Kensington feed to Einstein. I will admit that I don't know much about Wheaton or Kennedy but I would absolutely consider Kensington and Einstein as a place to purchase a home. I think Einstein has a great arts program and is a relatively small school for MoCo. It seems like there are lots of opportunities for the B student to find their niche at Einstein rather than going someplace where 90% of the kids take APs and a student not taking APs would feel out of place.
Anonymous wrote:NP here. My high school kid tells us there's a huge difference between AP classes (DD has taken 5 so far, will take 3-4 more next year) and honors classes (DD has taken a few of these too). The AP classes are too intense, and the honors classes are jokes, it almost seems like honors is the new "regular." It's too bad that MoCo doesn't have a happy medium!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Actually I didn't say that at all. Only that for a B student who won't take any APs the peer pressure may be a challenge and the resulting peer group may be less than ideal. Here are the US News stats:
Whitman - 82% of the kids take APs, an average of 4.6 tests per test taker
Churchill - 89% of the kids take APs, an average of 4.8 tests per test taker
Whitman's numbers are a little lower because there is a big special ed program that draws from multiple districts so those kids are not taking any APs.
Don't get me wrong, my kid attends one of these schools and it is a fabulous school. Not everyone is super bright, although some certainly are, but I am amazed how many are way above average. That extends to other activities too - so many of the kids excel at something outside of academics too.
Heaven forbid we should make special ed a priority!
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. The school can have a great special ed program but also emphasize AP's for the kids who aren't in special ed. I have no idea about the special ed program at Whitman and frankly, this is the first I've heard of it. I know Churchill has a bridge program. But since OP's kids are not in special ed, there is no reason to discuss this here. I fully appreciate that MoCo has serious problems with its special ed programs but a comment like this is not necessary every time someone mentions special ed in passing. Signed, parent of special ed dc
I am the PP who added the comment on the Whitman program. I did not say it was a bad thing, to the contrary it is a great program and the school encourages a Best Buddies program outside of school and provides school age buddies to accompany some of the kids to classes. There is also a new "unified" sports program for the kids that the county piloted last year. These are not ADHD/LD kids (I have one of those), they are kids with physical and mental challenges many of whom stay in the program until age 21. I only mention it to explain why Whitman may have a slight lower number of kids taking APs compared to Churchill as I thought that would be useful to the OP.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the PP is a pot-stirring asshole. So far the implication is that if we send our kids to Einstein, Wheaton, or Kennedy we don't care about giving our kids a good education or our kids are pregnant gang members. I think these uninformed and bigoted comments would elicit an unfavorable reaction from anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about Einstein, Wheaton or Kennedy?
Why aren't THEY on your list?
Because she wants a good education for her kids.
OP here. Because I grew up in that part of Silver Spring....and I'm NOT going back. It was nice-ish when I was there but it is no longer the part of MoCo I'd want to be in.
All 3 of those schools do not at all fit what I want for my kids. sorry, just being honest.
As for Whitman and Churchill being for AP kids- well, I gotta believe there are some average to above average kids in Bethesda, that is just a silly comment. What you're essentially saying is only people with super bright kids should buy in those areas of MoCo....that is just plain ol' dumb I tell ya!
You're afraid of blacks, Africans and Hispanics.
Admit it.
asshole! no, I'm afraid my kids will be exposed to fucking gang activity and teen pregnancy!!! stop trying to make it a race issue, it's not a race issue - it's a socio-economic issue. We work way too hard to be able to afford to live in a "nice" neighborhood so that we can shield our kids from SOME of that crap. I'm not so naive as to believe that you don't have issues in wealthier areas but I would like to decrease their exposure as much as possible. THAT'S WHY! So BOOOOO.....not afraid of blacks, africans or hispanics. jerk-off......
So, you're afraid of poor people...got it. Not a racist, just an elitist. Much better.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the PP is a pot-stirring asshole. So far the implication is that if we send our kids to Einstein, Wheaton, or Kennedy we don't care about giving our kids a good education or our kids are pregnant gang members. I think these uninformed and bigoted comments would elicit an unfavorable reaction from anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about Einstein, Wheaton or Kennedy?
Why aren't THEY on your list?
Because she wants a good education for her kids.
OP here. Because I grew up in that part of Silver Spring....and I'm NOT going back. It was nice-ish when I was there but it is no longer the part of MoCo I'd want to be in.
All 3 of those schools do not at all fit what I want for my kids. sorry, just being honest.
As for Whitman and Churchill being for AP kids- well, I gotta believe there are some average to above average kids in Bethesda, that is just a silly comment. What you're essentially saying is only people with super bright kids should buy in those areas of MoCo....that is just plain ol' dumb I tell ya!
You're afraid of blacks, Africans and Hispanics.
Admit it.