Anonymous wrote:
That is all relative. 600 is low if you are looking at selective colleges. My DC scored in the low 600s and the counselor recommended against sending scores to the score optional schools to which DC applied. Luckily the ACTs went better.
Anonymous wrote:A 500 on each test is "average.". 600 is high. 400 is low.
That is all relative. 600 is low if you are looking at selective colleges. My DC scored in the low 600s and the counselor recommended against sending scores to the score optional schools to which DC applied. Luckily the ACTs went better.
Anonymous wrote:Bates in Maine -- fantastic school, and test optional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a student had high scores the first time, they have a better chance of doing worse the second time. OPs scores were low for OPs GPA the first time so it's reasonable to expect improvement. Most students scores go up the second time, at least according to what our high school told us on college prep night. This can be especially true in math. Our DS said what they were covering inTrig really helped him with the math. His math score went up 100 points the second time. Also, test prep matters less the second time because students are familiar with the test from having taken it once. A good night's sleep really matters too. Students don't take that part seriously enough!
What do you mean by "high scores" the first time? High in general, or high for this particular student. The latter would seem to be some invisible benchmark that would make it hard to plan around.
A 500 on each test is "average.". 600 is high. 400 is low.
Anonymous wrote:100 years ago I got a 660 in Math and a 460 in Verbal.
It was so odd. Ends up - I found out I was dyslexic. But I did not find this out until my son was diagnosed.
I was 40 when I found out.
Op, any chance ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a student had high scores the first time, they have a better chance of doing worse the second time. OPs scores were low for OPs GPA the first time so it's reasonable to expect improvement. Most students scores go up the second time, at least according to what our high school told us on college prep night. This can be especially true in math. Our DS said what they were covering inTrig really helped him with the math. His math score went up 100 points the second time. Also, test prep matters less the second time because students are familiar with the test from having taken it once. A good night's sleep really matters too. Students don't take that part seriously enough!
What do you mean by "high scores" the first time? High in general, or high for this particular student. The latter would seem to be some invisible benchmark that would make it hard to plan around.
Anonymous wrote:DS had SAT scores almost identical to yours when he took them as a junior. He retook the test in the fall and he gained almost 200 points with no studying or test prep at all. Most kids see a decent increase on the retake. Personally, I wouldn't waste time with test prep at this point. Get involved, enjoy your senior year, you will get into a decent college! Most colleges weight grades much more than SATs anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I got great grades, went to a good private, and I had terrible SAT scores. I didn't know how to take standardized tests. I don't have a learning disability. Sometimes it's not about that.
Hey OP - My math + verbal SAT was 1030 on the old 400-1600 scale (this is going back 25 years ago), and I wound up going to one of my home state's smaller public universities. I worked really hard, had a 3.6 at the end of my 2nd year, and was accepted as a transfer into a top 25 university. I know it's tough to deal with now but just so you know a less than stellar SAT doesn't necessarily mean an academic death sentence.
Got into my college of choice after two year at another university. Anonymous wrote:OP, is that a weighted or unweighted GPA? Colleges look at the unweighted GPA, and some of them actually re-weight your unweighted grades to meet criteria of their own.
Have you tried the ACT? Some kids do a lot better on the ACT than on the SAT.
Anonymous wrote:If a student had high scores the first time, they have a better chance of doing worse the second time. OPs scores were low for OPs GPA the first time so it's reasonable to expect improvement. Most students scores go up the second time, at least according to what our high school told us on college prep night. This can be especially true in math. Our DS said what they were covering inTrig really helped him with the math. His math score went up 100 points the second time. Also, test prep matters less the second time because students are familiar with the test from having taken it once. A good night's sleep really matters too. Students don't take that part seriously enough!
Anonymous wrote:DS had SAT scores almost identical to yours when he took them as a junior. He retook the test in the fall and he gained almost 200 points with no studying or test prep at all. Most kids see a decent increase on the retake. Personally, I wouldn't waste time with test prep at this point. Get involved, enjoy your senior year, you will get into a decent college! Most colleges weight grades much more than SATs anyway.
Anonymous wrote:I got great grades, went to a good private, and I had terrible SAT scores. I didn't know how to take standardized tests. I don't have a learning disability. Sometimes it's not about that.