Anonymous wrote:If your child likes being RF, leave them. But a child who cries, yells, vomits etc.. is very distracting for the driver and increases the risk of being in an accident.
Anonymous wrote:He's 2.5, 36" and still RF. We were planning to turn him around for an upcoming trip, but sadly,our neighbor was recently in a terrible car accident and lost her older son (whom I assume was in a booster), the younger child survived. I know this type of accident is rare, but having it happen to a family we know was made me re-evaluate my plan to turn him around. Our neighbor, like us, drives smaller car, so that also influences our decision.
Anonymous wrote:
It always kills me that people assume when someone thinks their overprotectiveness is just that it somehow means we're insecure about our decision. I'm not. I think having a 3 yo facing a seat and not seeing the world in a car is silly and seals a child off from the world. The rationale is that it is so much safer. So is putting a kid in a helmet. They are safer and not that impractical. So just be consistent- that's all.
We waited until 13 months because before then, he wasn't really concerned about what we were doing in the front seat. ONce he was, we turned him around. He loved the car from that day on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13 months. Having your child wear a helmet all day is also safer, but we didn't do that either. so if you want to put him in a helmet and keep rear facing for 3 years, listen to some of the pps.
My daughter HAS to be in the car on an almost daily basis and it does not take me anymore time to get her in her seat that rear faces, than it would the other way around. I really do not understand your comparison to wearing a helmet all day long. If you are insecure with your choice to forward face, that is on you. It does not bother me either way what other families do!
It always kills me that people assume when someone thinks their overprotectiveness is just that it somehow means we're insecure about our decision. I'm not. I think having a 3 yo facing a seat and not seeing the world in a car is silly and seals a child off from the world. The rationale is that it is so much safer. So is putting a kid in a helmet. They are safer and not that impractical. So just be consistent- that's all.
We waited until 13 months because before then, he wasn't really concerned about what we were doing in the front seat. ONce he was, we turned him around. He loved the car from that day on.
Anonymous wrote:
It always kills me that people assume when someone thinks their overprotectiveness is just that it somehow means we're insecure about our decision. I'm not. I think having a 3 yo facing a seat and not seeing the world in a car is silly and seals a child off from the world. The rationale is that it is so much safer. So is putting a kid in a helmet. They are safer and not that impractical. So just be consistent- that's all.
We waited until 13 months because before then, he wasn't really concerned about what we were doing in the front seat. ONce he was, we turned him around. He loved the car from that day on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13 months. Having your child wear a helmet all day is also safer, but we didn't do that either. so if you want to put him in a helmet and keep rear facing for 3 years, listen to some of the pps.
My daughter HAS to be in the car on an almost daily basis and it does not take me anymore time to get her in her seat that rear faces, than it would the other way around. I really do not understand your comparison to wearing a helmet all day long. If you are insecure with your choice to forward face, that is on you. It does not bother me either way what other families do!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13 months. Having your child wear a helmet all day is also safer, but we didn't do that either. so if you want to put him in a helmet and keep rear facing for 3 years, listen to some of the pps.
Agreed. Having all of the adults, including "shotgun" passenger rear facing is also safer. We decided against that option.