Anonymous wrote:My son's K class has 26 student. 1 teacher, 1 full-time IA.
Honestly, I can't believe how well organized and well run that classroom is. The reality is that this has everything to do with the teacher and really not much to do with the class size.
Would I have preferred a few less students in the class? Yes, at least initially. But having seen firsthand how great my son's K experience has been, I'm much less worried about class sizes than I was at the start of the school year, and much much more concerned about quality of teaching.
Anonymous wrote:Completely agree with PP. It all depends on the teachers and how well they can educate and manage the kids! ~28 kids in K with one teacher and 1 aide is pretty standard in our FCPS pyramid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 is not "outrageous". Good lord, what decade was it when you were in school???
Oh, wow. Your standards are so low it's frightening. 28 children in an elementary class is both outrageous and unacceptable!
Would 14 kids in a class be outrageous and unacceptable?
Because if there are two adults, the kids effectively have a 1:14 ratio.
My family was talking about this recently. I had 22 kids in my kindergarten class...but no aide. My father had 53 kids in his elementary school class in Boston. So I'm not sure posters who said that all the classes used to be smaller are universally right.
There is a huge difference between 14 kids in a class with 1 teacher and 28 in a class with 2 teachers. It is class size, not ratio, that is the important metric. On the other hand, a good teacher can overcome many problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 is not "outrageous". Good lord, what decade was it when you were in school???
Oh, wow. Your standards are so low it's frightening. 28 children in an elementary class is both outrageous and unacceptable!
Would 14 kids in a class be outrageous and unacceptable?
Because if there are two adults, the kids effectively have a 1:14 ratio.
My family was talking about this recently. I had 22 kids in my kindergarten class...but no aide. My father had 53 kids in his elementary school class in Boston. So I'm not sure posters who said that all the classes used to be smaller are universally right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 is not "outrageous". Good lord, what decade was it when you were in school???
Oh, wow. Your standards are so low it's frightening. 28 children in an elementary class is both outrageous and unacceptable!
Anonymous wrote:28 is not "outrageous". Good lord, what decade was it when you were in school???
Anonymous wrote:Folks, this is not rural Virginia in the 1960's and 1970's. Population is different now and the schools have not kept pace with that. The utopian class sizes you all remember in public schools are just not realistic unless the county invests more in the schools- BUILDING new schools. And, I don't care what Miss-We'll Squash It- Arlington has to say. Arlington is in the same boat and will be facing the same constraints in coming years.
Fairfax and other area schools are the tops in the country. The kids and teachers do fine with the class sizes as is. Is it ideal? No. But, for crying out loud, this is not a tragedy. Additionally, kids are not always going to be in situations with small, intimate attention. Better get used to it early.
Anonymous wrote:Are there ratio rules in MoCo? Our K said that they weren't sure if there was goign to be another K class added, it depended how many kids registered this summer -- sounded like they were near some threshold & i can't figure out what it was (didnt ask)
Anonymous wrote:Are there ratio rules in MoCo? Our K said that they weren't sure if there was goign to be another K class added, it depended how many kids registered this summer -- sounded like they were near some threshold & i can't figure out what it was (didnt ask)