Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HHI=120K in DC
Offer was 4k off 23K, starting at 6th grade
Answer to school was no thank you.
I think we have too little debt, too much home equity and a SAHM. None of which we are willing to change as it would negative impact on the other members of the family.
It was difficult, but, in the end, probably the best decision for all concerned.
4K off 23K tuition sounds like a very good offer. What was your expectations of FA amount?
Anonymous wrote:Purely innocent question -- why don't people who don't like their local public schools move to a better county? Please don't hit me with alot of "how can I be so judgmental" comments. We live "outside the beltway" for jobs in DC, so we do the long commutes for work and school. I just don't understand why those that complain about their local public schools don't just pack up and look for a more modest home in a better school district? My husband and I made that choice for our kids. Just wondering why there are so many people on these boards bemoan the fact that they can't afford the DC privates, and that their local schools are terrible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:300k is solid middle class in dc so yes it makes sense
Here we go again. What dc do you live in?
For real. In what universe is HHI of 300k middle class? You do realize there are plenty of us around here raising families on HHI of 100-200k, right? And we are still able to shop, buy a home, and occasionally take vacations. Some of us even manage to send kids to private school on that, WITHOUT financial aid.
Anonymous wrote:Does not every child deserve the best education?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why?Anonymous wrote:Complaining about not being able to afford private school tuition is like complaining about not being able to afford first class airfare on a plane.
Schooling is a necessity
But private school is NOT a necessity. In this country we consider universal public education to be a social good and we provide it. Is it the best education available? Maybe not. But it is supposed to meet basic criteria. Like a bottom of the barrel car meets basic safety criteria.
Private school is a luxury. One that I wish to give to my child for a variety of reasons. The price is one reason why we decided to have only one child. With just one child, the tuition and aftercare are more than our mortgage. If you can't afford it on $200k+ income, rearrange your priorities and either don't send your kid to private, or make other sacrifices to make it work for you.
My view is that the private school is there for all the kids that have succeeded in getting admitted. For those it is not a luxury.
Public school is not the best place for every child. Some of them do not offer even a decent education
Country club is a luxury
Anonymous wrote:ppAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like the tone of PP who is saying private school is a luxury, and I think GOOD schools shouldn't be a luxury, they should be a right, and every child should go to a really good school. But till that day comes...people who have crappy local schools will do their damndest to send their kids to a better schools.
How do you define good? I don't know you so I don't mean to put words in your mouth, but unfortunately lot of people around here only consider a school "good" if most of the children who attend it do not receive free lunch. Frankly, for some people, a good school that every child could go to would no longer be exclusive enough for them to consider it a good school. I'm not sure what city or county you are referring to but my county (Mongtomery) has excellent schools, and when people refer to some of them as "crappy," they are referring to their opinion of the particular group of children who attend them. Which is very unseemly to me.
I think you are clueless
Obviously we are not talking about kids receiving free lunches.
ppAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like the tone of PP who is saying private school is a luxury, and I think GOOD schools shouldn't be a luxury, they should be a right, and every child should go to a really good school. But till that day comes...people who have crappy local schools will do their damndest to send their kids to a better schools.
How do you define good? I don't know you so I don't mean to put words in your mouth, but unfortunately lot of people around here only consider a school "good" if most of the children who attend it do not receive free lunch. Frankly, for some people, a good school that every child could go to would no longer be exclusive enough for them to consider it a good school. I'm not sure what city or county you are referring to but my county (Mongtomery) has excellent schools, and when people refer to some of them as "crappy," they are referring to their opinion of the particular group of children who attend them. Which is very unseemly to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I mean...what if you had to sell the giant house you can't afford in order to send your kid to the fancy school you can't afford. It's like Sophie's Choice all over again. :roll:
Are you serious ? Sophie's choice was over which child would go to the gas chamber and which might live and not choosing meant both would be murdered.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like the tone of PP who is saying private school is a luxury, and I think GOOD schools shouldn't be a luxury, they should be a right, and every child should go to a really good school. But till that day comes...people who have crappy local schools will do their damndest to send their kids to a better schools.