Anonymous wrote:And yet, I've had to go and argue against $2 million and $5 million cuts. 2% is a pretty large chunk of change for them.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/fairfax-county-school-board-often-has-millions-in-extra-cash-to-spend/2013/08/23/9a6a1c5e-fa06-11e2-9bde-7ddaa186b751_story_1.html
Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else annoyed that FCPS had $55 million extra this past year but we still are seeing huge class sizes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$25K? No. But I am going to send my child to private K at his current preschool to the tune of $8k. He will then move on to our neighborhood elementary FCPS.
Our plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class size has no correlation to student achievment, FYI.
This is dead wrong. Do a little bit of research before making such a claim.
http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/upload/cheri_wp136.pdf
I've done plenty of research. The empirical research shows time and time again teaching methods matter, not class size, and that teachers generally don't change their methods based on class size. So proud that you can Google, but you skipped the more relevant literature.
There are some exceptions when lower income populations are involved, but that's not relevant to FCPS.
You're the one who's dead wrong. Don't chime in when you're ignorant of the facts.
Here's one meta analysis: http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/115/4/1239.short. Right in the abstract (since I know you wouldn't understand the report itself): "The estimates indicate that class size does not have a statistically significant effect on student achievement."
Or maybe you prefer: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ431933&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ431933 Abstract: "Reduced class size may improve school tone and morale, but it is not an adequate policy alone for significantly accelerating student achievement"
Dutch study points out research from educators is different from that of economists: http://www1.fee.uva.nl/scholar/wp/wp04-99.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC is in the above average program (AAP) also. 30 in class. Still getting a good education, about same as I got in regular school 25 years ago. Alot depends on the teacher you get.
I did not have a similar curriculum in 5th and 6th grades when I was in "regular school" 33 years ago. But I am pleased with most of the curriculum in the GT center. Not science, though. The FCPS science curriculum is a joke. We teach science at home.
My dd's AAP center has a science resource teacher and the kids have science every day. My dd is in a class of 32 this year, and she has learned and retained more this year than she ever has before. It has nothing to do with the size of her class and everything to do with her amazing teacher.
What grade? We have found that the amount of time devoted to science classwork differs from year to year, depending on the SOLs that year. 3rd and 5th grade? Lots of science. 4th and 6th grade? not so much.