Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Better that they manufacture quotes than pull them from hacked cell phones. For them this is forward progress!
Fox News: They could be worse!
Anonymous wrote:Better that they manufacture quotes than pull them from hacked cell phones. For them this is forward progress!
Anonymous wrote:Fox news has by far the highest ratings. Biggest. Best. Fair and balanced. Libs hate balance.
Anonymous wrote:Fox news has by far the highest ratings. Biggest. Best. Fair and balanced. Libs hate balance.
Anonymous wrote:Fox is just a more professional product.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox news has by far the highest ratings. Biggest. Best. Fair and balanced. Libs hate balance.
Two million ignoramuses wearing Depends and speculating on gold futures can't be wrong.
The rest watch b/c they actually enjoy imbalance. Unbalanced people are fascinating.
Anonymous wrote:Fox news has by far the highest ratings. Biggest. Best. Fair and balanced. Libs hate balance.
Anonymous wrote:Fox news has by far the highest ratings. Biggest. Best. Fair and balanced. Libs hate balance.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Im not sure how the misquote changes the substance of the message?
This has been explained multiple times in this thread.
Obama was talking about the fact that he and Michelle both received assistance to obtain their educations. Romney could have been asked whether he thinks it is important to maintain and/or expand educational assistance so that people who are born without means can get the type of opportunities that the Obamas received. Instead, Romney was served a softball opportunity to attack Obama with accusations that Obama was trying to divide America.
Is it as severe as the Zimmerman editing? No. But, why has not one Fox supporter been able to say something like, "Fox made an unfortunate mistake and should issue a correction"? Plenty of liberals did something similar in the Zimmerman case. Instead, we have accusations made against MSNBC, my news-watching habits, and the threads that I start, plus countless posters unable to understand why it makes a difference.
Yes, it was wrong and a mistake of quotation, but not in the same ballpark.