Purse snatchings are brazen crimes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would blood run down to the side like that of he wasn't on top of Trayvon. He claimed he was on the bottom, wouldn't the blood me more smeared around the wound instead of running neatly down his head. Especially since he was hit I the ground repeatedly....weird.

Are you stupid, at some point he did have to get up and stand up while taking the picture.

Having a bad day? Feeling better after calling me stupid?

I'm just saying it looks pretty neat for being slammed into the ground several times. I would think the blood would be more smudged and plattered around the wound and his head.

This. Prosecution better get top shelf blood splatter expert for this trial. Hey! Is Dexter available? He's right down there in Miami! But seriously. This wounds look self inflicted. There should be smears on them--or there better be some corresponding blood on some pavement near the scene to show thongs happened the way he said they did.

I agree. Did you notice how the rivlets of blood stream in opposite directions - like he leaned to one side, jabbed himself in the head and then leaned to the other side and sliced the other side? Or else he was lying face down when he did it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:justice will prevail and we should charge the parents with lying and raising a gangsta

1. How are the parents lying? They aren't witnesses to the crime.
2. If he's the "gangsta", why is Zimmerman the one with priors for violent actions? (a) restraining order for domestic violence, (b) hit a cop, (c) got fired as a bouncer for being too violent

You're just like the old racists. Someone is guilty because you don't like how he looks.

The problem here is the "stand your ground law." People are too quick to start throwing race around.

In fact, police in DC are saying that some people in NW who may have observed suspects in some of the recent uptick in armed robberies and muggings were reluctant to phone in suspicions because they were afraid of being labeled "racial profilers." Criminals are getting more brazen -- there was a robbery/purse snatching in broad daylight on Porter St and 37th St. last Sunday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heads bleed a lot. And if someone was following you on a dark and rainy night, with a gun no less, wouldn't you try to defend yourself?

How did he know that George had a gun? YOu dont fight someone with a gun.

Don't know about you, but I know what a gun looks like and if I could not get away from a guy following me with a gun, you can damn well bet I am going to fight him. I'm not going to stand there and get shot.

Only a true idiot would fight someone who is aiming a gun at them. Run yes, fight? That's a reicipe for getting shot. It's not like the movies.

You assume he had somewhere left to run. From what I gather the scene of the actual shooting did not have exits. He may have been cornered.