Anonymous wrote:The question is, though, how does the school determine who is a "bad fit"? Even if you assume the school's motives are benevolent, I still wonder why some kids were counselled out and other kids who were in the same boat academically were allowed to stay? In some cases, yes, the kids who were counselled out also had some social/behavioral issues, but not always. In some cases, yes, the kids who were counselled out had PITA parents, but not always. Sidwell faculty members can be very judgmental about kids at times, and gossipy, and I have always wondered whether that was really what was involved in some of the counselling out decisions, more than concern for a child's well-being.
In our experience (diff private) the school counseled out a classmate who was struggling academically but who was clearly bright. The administration and teachers felt that the student simply wasn't doing as well as she could be because of the learning style of the student and the school's teaching style. (No learning disabilities.) Once the student changed schools to an equally rigorous program, she excelled and was one of the top students in her class. Sometimes it really IS about "fit" and teachers and administrators see it happen more often in the upper grades.