Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you are more refreshed, can you explain why many in the orthodox community want the state to step in and legislate on granting a get? If it is part of your religion and you choose to practice your religion, why get the state involved to "fix" what is a religious problem? I'm not even talking about the separation of church and state, but more about the fact that it's a religious principle of your faith and it should be accepted or changed by the religion if it isn't working properly. If changing it isn't allowed then you are still stuck with a religious problem. For the record, I think the principle of a get is oppressive to women, but I don't understand why it should be the government's problem to solve aside from the fact that it's an obvious separation of church and state.
I agree that the principle of a get is oppressive to women. Rabbis are increasingly requiring couples to sign a legally (in the civil courts) prenup to help alleviate the problem in the rare cases where an ex-husband refuses to give his wife a get. In those cases, the wife, and the community, turns to any and all avenues to compel the husband to give the get. Sometimes that means trying to use the courts. I dont know where anyone has asked the state legislature to step in, but I am not familiar with every case. I dont really see how it can be legislated and dont think its a good idea to ask the state to step in. If its been done, its generally out of desperation.
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that some rabbis use their mouths to clean a baby boy after his bris? And I know that it is true, there was a case several years ago in NY where a rabbi spread herpes to several baby boys after performing this disgusting ritual. I read about it in the WaPo. I don't feel like linking the source now, but I'm sure you will know what I am talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that some rabbis use their mouths to clean a baby boy after his bris? And I know that it is true, there was a case several years ago in NY where a rabbi spread herpes to several baby boys after performing this disgusting ritual. I read about it in the WaPo. I don't feel like linking the source now, but I'm sure you will know what I am talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Aa a man, that seems pretty invasive to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what if that person't mother was converted by a reform rabbi, not an orthodox rabbi - before that person was born.
This happened to one of my good friends and she converted bc she wanted to make sure there were no doubts. She also wanted to ensure it wasnt an issue when she got married and for her own kids.
Generally, I still believe the person would need to convert again, even as just a formality, but it would depend on who converted the mom and how that process went.
Ok, but you realize for a man that "formality" includes a ritual circumcision. Even if he had a bris performed by a reform or conservative rabbi.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what if that person't mother was converted by a reform rabbi, not an orthodox rabbi - before that person was born.
This happened to one of my good friends and she converted bc she wanted to make sure there were no doubts. She also wanted to ensure it wasnt an issue when she got married and for her own kids.
Generally, I still believe the person would need to convert again, even as just a formality, but it would depend on who converted the mom and how that process went.
Anonymous wrote:Do you vote republican or democrat?
Anonymous wrote:what if that person't mother was converted by a reform rabbi, not an orthodox rabbi - before that person was born.