Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:$1,325,000 in NWDC.
Did OP ask where? You DC people are such snobs.
Not the OP or either of the PPs, but I wouldn' be surprised if location partially explains the wide range of answers. We're in this income range and have a small $700K house in NWDC that feels more cramped each year as the kids get get older, so at some point we'll look into buying a bigger house in the $1 million plus range. That's a sensible choice for our family - it makes sense for us to live in the city because the shorter commute means more time with the kids, and it makes sense to spend $ 1 million to get a house we'd be more comfortable in and that's still within our means. But if we worked and lived in the outer suburbs, I think we'd probably make different choices --$700K would be plenty to get a decent-sized house and we wouldn't get much value out of living in a huge house, so there'd be no point to spending more just because we could. Another variable is family size -- if we had only one kid, I think we'd probably stay in our small $700K house, because again, we'd get more value out of putting our money into things other than extra square footage. In other words, I would guess that the posters who bought less house than they could afford had good, individualized reasons for doing so, and I would guess that the posters who bought at the top of the responsible price range also had good, individualized reasons for doing so. Everyone's cost-benefit analysis is going to be different (which is another reason OP shouldn't be relying on these posts to decide her own price point, although it's interesting to see what other financially-similarly-situated families are doing).