Anonymous wrote:There is no way 1 teacher can handle additional differentiation ( especially on the upside) in a class of 25+.
The only reason they cater to those performing on the low end is that they have to meet SOL standards.
But there are no such restrictions on the high end.
I don't see a) FCPS rolling this out to each school and therefore b) this has nothing to do with AAP centers.
I think they are just trying to see if its feasible to better serve the needs of kids who can be challenged more.
But knowing how overloaded teachers already are, I dont see this taking off.
Anonymous wrote:Will this decrease farms
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing I care about most is whether they will still place the "Level IV" kids together. Great if they are going to (try to) teach the AAP curriculum to everyone, but hopefully they will continue to attempt to segregate the truly advanced learners from the rest. It's good for nobody for the Einsteins of the class to be placed with everyone else -- the Einsteins get bored, and the other kids in the class don't enjoy learning as much in the Einsteins' shadows. I hope they don't throw out the actual positives from the AAP program.
This is what I am trying to understand. I have kids at the AAP center and I have seen such a change in them since they have been there socially and academically. If they're going to be thrown in with the general population at the center school, they might as well have stayed at our base school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:pp, you mean the 20 percent Einsteins. you know, all the ones who did test prep and everything so their tiger parents can feel better about what their loins produced.
You sound very unhappy and bitter. Why not use that energy on your children and stop complaining about gifted children. You obviously don't have a gifted child or you would understand how quickly they learn and how differentiation is necessary for them. The new curriculum for gen ed will be good for them... Maybe your kids too. So whyso much anger?
Anonymous wrote:When I first knew that our base school is going to have AAP in the coming sept., I was so happy! However, I started wondering how they are going to do that, though the AA teacher always claimed that they will use the same materials the centers use. Just an example to share, my daughter was selected to be in an advanced reading class, they are supposed to meet once every week. 4 months has gone, they only met with the reading teacher not more than 5 times!!!! Sometimes my kid came back home and told me that the reading teacher was on leave for a week to visit family, sometimes she had meetings.... all sorts of reasons! It made me wonder if the base schools (maybe only my daughter's school) are really ready for the AAP. OR just claim the name but not really doing the thing?
Anonymous wrote:pp, you mean the 20 percent Einsteins. you know, all the ones who did test prep and everything so their tiger parents can feel better about what their loins produced.
Anonymous wrote:I disagree with PP who said (sorry, I don't know how to make it show up in blue):
Actually, at our FFX base school, it's already 40% AAP (no one even bothers going to the center anymore because the base is a better school). Yes, 2 full classes out of 5 are AAP. So I do see it as the beginning of the end of the AAP centers. Saves money, still segregates and everyone is happy.
It's no big deal for those who go to a base school that's 40% AAP, but for those kids whose base school only has 8 kids going to AAP in a grade, they currently often opt for the center school. If centers are eliminated, those 8 kids will suffer the most, as they'll be forced back essentially into gen ed, with something like 8 AAP kids with 16 gen ed at their base.