Anonymous wrote:You all understand that "diversity" has little to do with skin tone and just about everything to do with socioeconomics?
I laugh when rich people pat themselves on the back that their schools and neighborhood are soooo diverse with the rainbow of nationalities. True diversity is interacting with people from different economic and educational backgrounds-which really does not mean much in this area, unless you sit down to talk with your housecleaner while she scrubs your floors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all understand that "diversity" has little to do with skin tone and just about everything to do with socioeconomics?
I laugh when rich people pat themselves on the back that their schools and neighborhood are soooo diverse with the rainbow of nationalities. True diversity is interacting with people from different economic and educational backgrounds-which really does not mean much in this area, unless you sit down to talk with your housecleaner while she scrubs your floors.
To the extent that you are saying that ONLY socioeconomic diversity is "true" diversity, I disagree. Black, white, Latino, Asian - they may all earn the same, but their backgrounds, including their socioeconomic backgrounds, may be vastly different. There is much to appreciate and learn from racial diversity, diversity of origin (immigrant/non-immigrant), religious diversity, etc., etc., as well as from current socioeconomic diversity. The idea that there is only the one, true Diversity is preachy and misguided.
Oh great, this is a terrific lesson for your kids. "Pay attention, kids, observe that black people are different than us." Who are you, Strom Thurmond?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when did we start calling daycare workers "teachers?" What kind of a euphemism is that?
At our old Bright Horizons, which had a predominately AA inner city staff, I also wondered this since I really didn't see any teaching going on. At our new suburban center which has a very diverse staff, including some white/European employees, the staff really does teach and they deserve the title. So glad we got out of the city and away from Bright Horizons.
What does the fact that the old BH "had a predominantly AA inner city staff" have to do with anything? Workers are either teaching or they are not. You sound as if you are attributing the lack of teaching to race/presumed "inner city"-ness. That makes you sound like a jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all understand that "diversity" has little to do with skin tone and just about everything to do with socioeconomics?
I laugh when rich people pat themselves on the back that their schools and neighborhood are soooo diverse with the rainbow of nationalities. True diversity is interacting with people from different economic and educational backgrounds-which really does not mean much in this area, unless you sit down to talk with your housecleaner while she scrubs your floors.
To the extent that you are saying that ONLY socioeconomic diversity is "true" diversity, I disagree. Black, white, Latino, Asian - they may all earn the same, but their backgrounds, including their socioeconomic backgrounds, may be vastly different. There is much to appreciate and learn from racial diversity, diversity of origin (immigrant/non-immigrant), religious diversity, etc., etc., as well as from current socioeconomic diversity. The idea that there is only the one, true Diversity is preachy and misguided.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all understand that "diversity" has little to do with skin tone and just about everything to do with socioeconomics?
I laugh when rich people pat themselves on the back that their schools and neighborhood are soooo diverse with the rainbow of nationalities. True diversity is interacting with people from different economic and educational backgrounds-which really does not mean much in this area, unless you sit down to talk with your housecleaner while she scrubs your floors.
To the extent that you are saying that ONLY socioeconomic diversity is "true" diversity, I disagree. Black, white, Latino, Asian - they may all earn the same, but their backgrounds, including their socioeconomic backgrounds, may be vastly different. There is much to appreciate and learn from racial diversity, diversity of origin (immigrant/non-immigrant), religious diversity, etc., etc., as well as from current socioeconomic diversity. The idea that there is only the one, true Diversity is preachy and misguided.
puhlease.
I attended all girls Madeira boarding school. The skin was diverse, but there was NOTHING diverse about the students other than what country they vacationed at during breaks.
Oh sure, I got to witness traditional Chinese and Indian dance and ate some "diverse" foods, but when you are in the same socioeconomic class, things are pretty much the same...same opportunities in life, same top tier colleges and universities, and same amounts of relative extravagance. Oh yea, there was some diversity in country club membership…ya know congressional, Washington, or River Bend-so yea, you’re right-it was quite diverse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when did we start calling daycare workers "teachers?" What kind of a euphemism is that?
At our old Bright Horizons, which had a predominately AA inner city staff, I also wondered this since I really didn't see any teaching going on. At our new suburban center which has a very diverse staff, including some white/European employees, the staff really does teach and they deserve the title. So glad we got out of the city and away from Bright Horizons.
Anonymous wrote:Since when did we start calling daycare workers "teachers?" What kind of a euphemism is that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all understand that "diversity" has little to do with skin tone and just about everything to do with socioeconomics?
I laugh when rich people pat themselves on the back that their schools and neighborhood are soooo diverse with the rainbow of nationalities. True diversity is interacting with people from different economic and educational backgrounds-which really does not mean much in this area, unless you sit down to talk with your housecleaner while she scrubs your floors.
To the extent that you are saying that ONLY socioeconomic diversity is "true" diversity, I disagree. Black, white, Latino, Asian - they may all earn the same, but their backgrounds, including their socioeconomic backgrounds, may be vastly different. There is much to appreciate and learn from racial diversity, diversity of origin (immigrant/non-immigrant), religious diversity, etc., etc., as well as from current socioeconomic diversity. The idea that there is only the one, true Diversity is preachy and misguided.
Anonymous wrote:Since when did we start calling daycare workers "teachers?" What kind of a euphemism is that?
Anonymous wrote:"It boils down to what socioeconomic group will work for the lower wages".
That's your answer right there.