Anonymous wrote:it is a myth
Bullshit. I am proof of that, and if you went to law school you are proof of that. I know many first generation college grads who busted their buts to move up the socio-economic ladder. A lack of generational wealth does not equate to a lack of opportunity.
Anonymous wrote:FA recipient here. The worst part is having to be around all of the insufferable big law parents. You are a boring lot and your bratty entitled kids really aren't that smart.
Look, I completely agree with you about the boring BigLaw parents whose kids are only moderately bright in many cases. Our school is full of them (and kids of real estate developers. Lots of S class Mercedes, not a one is a mental giant).
But what is rich here is that you wouldn't be in your school without these men. You owe your child's ability to attend, let's say, GDS or NCS, to the equity partners at Covington. Who pull in $1 million a year and give annual gifts of $10 - $50,000 to your school. (I am none of the above and even I can clearly see this common dynamic).
Does that uplift you or bother you, FA parent? Before you answer, think of your in-bound school.
FA recipient here. The worst part is having to be around all of the insufferable big law parents. You are a boring lot and your bratty entitled kids really aren't that smart.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is fa artificially raises the cost of tuition thus pushing out middle class families. I think that is the anger and I understand that.
Anonymous wrote:Please stop feeding the troll on this thread. You just give her more power when you respond to her garbage.
Anonymous wrote:FA recipient here. The worst part is having to be around all of the insufferable big law parents. You are a boring lot and your bratty entitled kids really aren't that smart.
Anonymous wrote:Funny, all of the PPs who say the PP responders are complaining about FA. Actually, OP is the one complaining. PPs are just responding.
it is a myth