Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am the pp. In never said "middle school stinks and will never get better". I said that the Ward 6 middle school plan stinks and isn't really an effective vehicle to better middle schools. Totally different.
Sorry, I assumed you were also "What age? We got out (gladly) becaues it leads to no where. Most parents with kids in older classes do the lottery each year in the hopes of making the jump out -- though they won't tell you that at a Maury event."
If you're jumping ship from an elementary school you like at kindergarten simply because middle-school may not be ready, I think that's irrational. Not that you disagree with the plan, etc...
Anonymous wrote:I am the pp. In never said "middle school stinks and will never get better". I said that the Ward 6 middle school plan stinks and isn't really an effective vehicle to better middle schools. Totally different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i guess i'm not the type of parent who frets about "middle school options" while my kid is 4 years old. either things will have changed for the better on the hill, or we'll move. what's the difference between moving now or in 6 years? i'll just play the hand i have for now and feel very, very fortunate.
my girl goes to maury. she told me last night that "since i like art, maury is the school for me." that blew me away. maury's specials (PE, art, music, thinktank) are amazing!
Look, there is a difference between fretting and planning/taking action. You can sit back passively and hope things get better on the Hill or you can get involved and make them better. If you look at what has happened with schools like Brent, Maury and Tyler you will notice that happened when people stopped "hoping" and did something. Tyler requested a specialized program to attract parents, for example. Parents got involved at Brent years before their kid was old enough to enroll.
Stop calling your neighbors with little ones who are actively working for better public middle schools "irrational" and portraying us as hyper anxious and get involved.
Anonymous wrote:
Er, if there are "a lot of great middle school possibilities in DC" then why aren't you planning to use any of them? Can you even name them? Right now, there are two: Latin (requires getting lucky in the lottery) and Deal (which is bigger than a small town and packed to the gills). That doesn't fit my definition of "a lot."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WARD SIX MS ENROLLMENT/CAPACITY - (Pre-Shaw in Ward 6)
SH – 428 / 460
Also not accurate. Old numbers maybe? With the new 6-8 grade configuration, SH is OVER enrolled at 430.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And also should be said that only a small percentage of students at SH are from Ward 6.
Not true. 55% of the 430 enrolled this year at SH are Ward 6 kids.
Anonymous wrote:WARD SIX MS ENROLLMENT/CAPACITY - (Pre-Shaw in Ward 6)
SH – 428 / 460
Anonymous wrote:And also should be said that only a small percentage of students at SH are from Ward 6.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Plus E-H is really competing with S-H for modernization/revamp. Those Cluster parents are way ahead in their demands so if anything gets more investment it will be S-H first.
Actually, Eliot-Hine is revamped/modernized already, a beautiful space all around. Hopefully. Stuart-Hobson will be next.
I don't believe this is the case. EH is slated for a modernization in 2014 (Jefferson in 2013). EH got a buff and scrub in 2009 as part of receiving Hine MS, but the building is still dated and lacking in significant ways. See link:
http://www.21csf.org/csf-home/DocUploads/DataShop/DS_280.pdf
At the Stuart Hobson modernization event last week we heard a call to action for the SH community to advocate for significant increases in their modernization funding. Tommy Wells said, although it shouldn't be this way, modernization funds are a zero-sum game amongst the four middle schools in Ward Six (SH, EH, Jefferson and now Shaw). If SH wants a parking structure or an addition, then it comes out of funding for another Ward Six school. Mr. Wells even got heckled by a future SH parent for saying this. SH parent leaders made the case that funding levels are unfair (compared to other wards), but that seems like wishful thinking more then realpolitik.
Not that I fault the SH for doing everything in their power to get funds and make SH a better school, but let's not ignore the fact that whether or not funding SH is a good thing all depends on where you sit.
Anonymous wrote:i guess i'm not the type of parent who frets about "middle school options" while my kid is 4 years old. either things will have changed for the better on the hill, or we'll move. what's the difference between moving now or in 6 years? i'll just play the hand i have for now and feel very, very fortunate.
my girl goes to maury. she told me last night that "since i like art, maury is the school for me." that blew me away. maury's specials (PE, art, music, thinktank) are amazing!