Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is there suck a lack of safe haven promotion? No commercials, billboards, etc...
Agreed. They should provide the information to local area high schools are require them to post it as well as posting in any other public building.
Maybe its so poorly advertised bc people hate the idea of abandoned baby .
Or we could start at the other end by supporting comprehensive sex ed and securing reproductive rights, rather than waiting for someone to abandon a baby.
This is a tragedy, though.
Both are done and are more highly marketed then a safe haven sites.
So it would have been commendable for the mother to have aborted the baby?
Yes!
1st best would have been using protection so this didn't happen in the first place. But certainly I would have thought we could agree that abortion is preferable to infanticide.
In both cases, the mother chooses to end her child's life. So as long as she ends the life privately, and pays someone else to do it for her, she is making a good choice, but if she does it publicly, she is a terrible person?
What if she had gone to Dr. Brigham, the abortionist in MD who apparently kept his freezer full of full-term aborted fetuses? Are those abortions still preferable to post-birth infanticide? Why? Because they are more surgical, medical?
Simply put, the PPs who bemoaned the fact that this poor baby was not aborted earlier in her short life share the mindset of the mother who abandoned her child. Either way, they've decided her life was not worth living.
I disagree. It is not just a tragedy that the sweet thing suffered horribly before she died. It is a tragedy that she did not get to live. Someone would have loved her, and she had love to give.